Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mathematic

(1,618 posts)
12. Another unsupported interpretation
Fri May 4, 2012, 10:02 AM
May 2012

You know they ask people if they want a job. People that never had a job or never looked for a job or stopped looking for a job or are completely unavailable to work at a job are all included in the figures I quoted. The only people that are not included are the people that said they don't want to work. And now you're telling me that they really DO want to work they're just lying. Could you tell me which BLS table I can look up the "Really do want work even though they say they don't (trust us)" category?

When the spin has lost all basis in fact it's time to stop spinning. You're not promulgating an alternate interpretation, you're straight-up inventing a new reality. This month's numbers were good and undesirable joblessness is decreasing.

And yes, as I've said before, I consider a lower employment population ratio a SUCCESS as long as it comes from people with the means to not work deciding they want to live their lives without the soul-crushing drudgery of a job.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

du rec. nt xchrom May 2012 #1
whats up brother, and thanks for the report jschurchin May 2012 #2
Every month you misinterpret this data mathematic May 2012 #6
They "don't want" them. sendero May 2012 #8
Another unsupported interpretation mathematic May 2012 #12
You are quite.. sendero May 2012 #16
It's not that they don't "want" to work. Beacool May 2012 #20
Woohoo - Fewer people want jobs that don't exist - we're on a roll jtuck004 May 2012 #22
I'm glad we're moving past the "more and more people are jobless and want to work" fiction mathematic May 2012 #23
Not we. There are over 50 million people who would move back into the workforce tomorrow jtuck004 May 2012 #27
+1 Psephos May 2012 #11
When your bubble population generation is now hitting their mid 60s dmallind May 2012 #13
That only accounts for about 33 million of the 86 million invisible unemployed jtuck004 May 2012 #21
Obama 2012.1 jpak May 2012 #17
The last two months numbers were revised upwards. 'Morning Joe' did not mention that, of course. flpoljunkie May 2012 #3
Thanks for that stat! BumRushDaShow May 2012 #4
No! Hiring figures are ALWAYS revised down. I read it on DU.... dmallind May 2012 #10
I guess it's better than going the other direction. nt Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2012 #5
Easy to identify DU's fatalists. JNelson6563 May 2012 #7
The only joke about the Gallup report is people who misinterpreted it dmallind May 2012 #9
GOPers have worked hard josey12 May 2012 #14
Our returning Iraq & Afghanistan veterans josey12 May 2012 #15
Not That Good DallasNE May 2012 #18
Discouraging news. Beacool May 2012 #19
It's clear that some people in this thread are rooting for failure. So transparent and sad! Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2012 #24
Is it really rooting for failure. Or is it merely telling the truth? totodeinhere May 2012 #25
You made a good point. My post was not about EVERYONE! Just the attitudes of some who we all know Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2012 #26
Of Course... dennis4868 May 2012 #29
March saw one of the most massive tornado/storm/hail outbreaks in history. progressivebydesign May 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Payroll employment rises ...»Reply #12