Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

SCantiGOP

(14,760 posts)

7. EPA rules amended early in the Bush/Vader administration

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Fri May 4, 2012, 02:03 PM

May 2012

said that anything which could potentially get into the ground water, meaning anything that is put on or in the ground, has to have a full chemical analysis submitted to the EPA
EXCEPT
those chemicals used by the oil and gas extraction industry. Give 'em credit, those industries got their money's worth when they helped buy the 2000 election.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US wants drillers to disclose 'fracking' chemicals used on federal lands [View all] Eugene May 2012 OP

But that will hurt business' ability to make money at the expense of everyone else! AllyCat May 2012 #1

They don't need the message. ALEC and the Koches are framing that and the GOP has said it forever. freshwest May 2012 #6

I agree freshwest, but I guess I should have put the little sarcasm smily after my post AllyCat May 2012 #12

We are cool, didn't mean to sound like that was directed at you. freshwest May 2012 #13

With all the talk about too much regulation you'd think think May 2012 #2

How about forgetting Fracking Politicalboi May 2012 #3

But not in people's back yards? crazylikafox May 2012 #4

Could this be the reason for the so-called "Sagebush Rebellion?" KansDem May 2012 #5

EPA rules amended early in the Bush/Vader administration SCantiGOP May 2012 #7

And Halliburton is supplying those chemicals. mwdem May 2012 #8

"However, the rule lacks a handful of basic public right-to-know measures." Wilms May 2012 #9

How about EVERYWHERE...?! Earth_First May 2012 #10

If not for exceptions for the gas industry, the disclosure would be SOP PufPuf23 May 2012 #11

Vermont is prohibiting it arikara May 2012 #14

Vermont is right! burrowowl May 2012 #15

NJ Rep. Rush Holt: "Do Coloradans react differently to water pollution?" proverbialwisdom May 2012 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom May 2012 #17