Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
Fri May 4, 2012, 09:03 PM May 2012

U.S. must heal native peoples' wounds, return lands: U.N. [View all]

Source: Reuters


(Reuters) - The United States must do more to heal the wounds of indigenous peoples caused by more than a century of oppression, including restoring control over lands Native Americans consider to be sacred, a U.N. human rights investigator said on Friday.

James Anaya, the U.N. special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, just completed a 12-day visit to the United States where he met with representatives of indigenous peoples in the District of Columbia, Arizona, Alaska, Oregon, Washington State, South Dakota, and Oklahoma. He also met with U.S. government officials.

"I have heard stories that make evident the profound hurt that indigenous peoples continue to feel because of the history of oppression they have faced," Anaya said in a statement issued by the U.N. human rights office in Geneva.

That oppression, he said, has included the seizure of lands and resources, the removal of children from their families and communities, the loss of languages, violation of treaties, and brutality, all grounded in racial discrimination.

Anaya welcomed the U.S. decision to endorse the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2010 and other steps the government has taken, but said more was needed. His findings will be included in a final report submitted to the U.N. Human Rights Council. While not binding, the recommendations carry moral weight that can influence governments.


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/04/us-usa-indigenous-un-idUSBRE8431Q220120504

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That we were meant to exist as part of nature annabanana May 2012 #1
Yet those "noble savages" still killed off the Megafauna. Odin2005 May 2012 #4
Yep. That said, what was done to them was - at least - in the same league. Posteritatis May 2012 #6
Oh, I agree completely. Odin2005 May 2012 #10
Yet, the concurrent megafauna die-off in Europe is attributed to climate Mabus May 2012 #16
+1 4th law of robotics May 2012 #17
5 paras. Baitball Blogger May 2012 #2
More needs to be done, for sure. Vattel May 2012 #3
K&R. Odin2005 May 2012 #5
A biased result castnet55 May 2012 #7
Uh, Yeah....... alittlelark May 2012 #9
+1 yellerpup May 2012 #12
"Do we as a society continue to pour in millions of dollars as we have in the war on poverty?" bemildred May 2012 #13
Biased, or informed? sofa king May 2012 #19
Cobell vs Salazar Settlement - a "win" for the Obama Administration PufPuf23 May 2012 #41
so we should only pay attention to studies by white people? Enrique May 2012 #32
+1000 n/t ProfessionalLeftist May 2012 #33
K&R DeSwiss May 2012 #8
My favorite. yellerpup May 2012 #11
K&R! countryjake May 2012 #14
Let's give them something big like gigantic valuable tracts of land. limpyhobbler May 2012 #15
Farcical nonsense Ron Obvious May 2012 #18
Gee, are the Nomans in power now? lunatica May 2012 #20
The Normans stayed Ron Obvious May 2012 #21
LOL! lunatica May 2012 #22
Thanks Ron Obvious May 2012 #23
Did the King of England treat with the Normans? sofa king May 2012 #24
What difference does it make? Ron Obvious May 2012 #25
I've heard of Kennewick man, have you heard of the Ainu? azurnoir May 2012 #27
I've heard of them... Ron Obvious May 2012 #31
Yes, but few of them promised to pay for it. sofa king May 2012 #34
Did the Norman King treat with the English? ieoeja May 2012 #42
here is the difference -assimilation in fact the very form of English you now speak and write in is azurnoir May 2012 #29
Of course Ron Obvious May 2012 #30
Assimilation is not a legal defense for the U.S. sofa king May 2012 #35
OK Ron Obvious May 2012 #36
Yep, even the term "Indian" is contentious. sofa king May 2012 #38
Very informative Ron Obvious May 2012 #39
Is Ghadaffy still listed on the board of human rights commission ? may3rd May 2012 #26
Resistance is futile? AnOhioan May 2012 #37
The Firesign Theatre used this as one of the core themes in one of their best albums slackmaster May 2012 #28
i can sort of see where..... rppper May 2012 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. must heal native peo...