Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: MSNBC: Nebraska's Ben Nelson will not seek reelection. [View all]lsewpershad
(2,620 posts)81. Good riddance
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That 'same sex stuff' is a fake out. He Voted YES on a Constitutional ban on marriage
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#23
Forgot to add "Deciding vote on Bush Tax Cuts" and "Voted against raising debt ceiling".
bullwinkle428
Dec 2011
#37
He was with us on Medicare and Soc Sec and those votes are coming and he'll be gone!
SugarShack
Dec 2011
#82
If the Party does not know who to run, that is a huge failure on their part.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#25
You already have said you lived your whole life in a blue state. You clearly dont understand what
stevenleser
Dec 2011
#42
Let's see how all the folks who claim it's easy to replace Blue Dogs with "real" Dems now.
dmallind
Dec 2011
#17
but why waste resources that can go to winnable races, such as Warren's, Berkley's, Heitkamp's etc.
liskddksil
Dec 2011
#20
Because of the 79%. Who gets to lead the Senate and committees depends on numbers too. nt
dmallind
Dec 2011
#29
which is why we need use our limited resources to help the candidates that can win, so we can hold
liskddksil
Dec 2011
#34
And his far right GOP replacement? How do you think they will vote on those committees? nt
stevenleser
Dec 2011
#43
You miss the point. The Senate numbers determine who leads and forms committees
dmallind
Dec 2011
#49
Sometimes things need to get worse before they can get better. Nelson is a sell-out to the 1% if
harun
Dec 2011
#48
How long until he passes through the revolving door and reappears as a healthco lobbyist?
Bozita
Dec 2011
#2
Dunno about loopholes, but I'm pretty sure the waiting period for lobbyist is 5 years now.
TheWraith
Dec 2011
#38
Why don't you wait and see who's running on our side before you CHICKEN OUT!!!
bigdarryl
Dec 2011
#11
And that fact, if it is a fact, is a failure on the part of the Party leadership, national
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2011
#26
Explain how you get a "deep bench" when you cannot even elect a Democratic janitor.
joeglow3
Dec 2011
#51
Yes. They have a different concept of what it means to be a Democrat. Best evidence of this
stevenleser
Dec 2011
#40
Which now makes 7 Democrats and 2 Republicans retiring from The Sentate - LIST on link below
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#44
"I know all there is to know about the holograms"...sung to the Crying Game
Safetykitten
Dec 2011
#59
A republican will replace his seat and outside the letter we won't be able to tell the difference
LynneSin
Dec 2011
#64
I knew Bruning was the guy when they ran a massive ad camaign for his unopposed run for AG
OmahaBlueDog
Dec 2011
#77