Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(53,661 posts)

13. We are cool, didn't mean to sound like that was directed at you.

Sat May 5, 2012, 05:44 PM

May 2012

Was trying to agree, but it may not have sounded that way.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US wants drillers to disclose 'fracking' chemicals used on federal lands [View all] Eugene May 2012 OP

We are cool, didn't mean to sound like that was directed at you. freshwest May 2012 #13

With all the talk about too much regulation you'd think think May 2012 #2

How about forgetting Fracking Politicalboi May 2012 #3

But not in people's back yards? crazylikafox May 2012 #4

Could this be the reason for the so-called "Sagebush Rebellion?" KansDem May 2012 #5

EPA rules amended early in the Bush/Vader administration SCantiGOP May 2012 #7

And Halliburton is supplying those chemicals. mwdem May 2012 #8

How about EVERYWHERE...?! Earth_First May 2012 #10

Vermont is prohibiting it arikara May 2012 #14

Vermont is right! burrowowl May 2012 #15

NJ Rep. Rush Holt: "Do Coloradans react differently to water pollution?" proverbialwisdom May 2012 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom May 2012 #17