Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

high density

(13,397 posts)
14. So it's now time for another trillion dollar round of tax cuts for the rich!
Mon May 7, 2012, 09:10 PM
May 2012

After all, we'll have even higher tax collection when the rich pay even less in... Because that's how it works in the opposite world that the GOP lives in.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hubba Hubba! Populist_Prole May 2012 #1
Like this: Orrex May 2012 #2
or this: DCBob May 2012 #7
Some variant of that might show up on DU, too. DavidDvorkin May 2012 #25
They'll do like "Dumbya" and proclaim that it's "your money," so give it back in massive tax cuts. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2012 #16
Why is it that the GOP always runs up the credit card, and the Dems have to be the responsible ones MADem May 2012 #22
And...as someone cogently put.... Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2012 #24
George Bush panopeagenerosa May 2012 #19
Think what we could do if the House wasn't working against us. Scuba May 2012 #3
The economic downturn would probably be functionally over by now. TheWraith May 2012 #5
And all over the country the GOPT Smilo May 2012 #4
That's what i'm talking about skeewee08 May 2012 #6
Goppers are already saying Iliyah May 2012 #8
"and he made it worse" - Mittfield Rmoney annabanana May 2012 #9
Second that motion...Let'em eat it up.....nt. Stuart G May 2012 #11
wow. We must have a Democratic administration BootinUp May 2012 #10
Way to go! n/t bitchkitty May 2012 #12
both good and bad... ejbr May 2012 #13
So it's now time for another trillion dollar round of tax cuts for the rich! high density May 2012 #14
So they still aren't counting war spending then? progressoid May 2012 #15
Wow. ProudToBeBlueInRhody May 2012 #17
Is their timeline wrong? cstanleytech May 2012 #18
No. It's correct... Drunken Irishman May 2012 #20
Wey-ell, isn't THAY-AT SPESH-ull??? MADem May 2012 #21
It's due to shifting the timing of some payments and outlays; without that, there's no surplus. Psephos May 2012 #23
Mitt Romney will be taking credit for this any second!! JoePhilly May 2012 #26
K&R jpak May 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. to run first (monthl...»Reply #14