Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: New York Times alters Clinton email story [View all]Kingofalldems
(40,305 posts)35. Geek tragedy responded to Beauregard and you responded
as if he were posting to you. Geek tragedy did not refer to you as far as I can tell.
Speaking of smears though, this whole Hillary email thing has just fallen flat for the republicans. Don't you think?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
made up bullshit .... Hillary's emails, Behghazi, Swift Boats for Truth, and on and on
Botany
Jul 2015
#3
1st they say potato, then they say potahto, but they won't call the whole thing off.
Divernan
Jul 2015
#18
The point is not to put anything to rest...there is nothing to put to rest.
Evergreen Emerald
Jul 2015
#6
Many updates debunking it. Even the NYT retracted their story. This is a 'Sorry, no cigar' thing. nt
freshwest
Jul 2015
#46
Words, huh? Partial retraction with a 64-page correction vs. the thrust of the article. Bye. n/t
freshwest
Jul 2015
#53
No one is safe. The Republicans managed to bring the Popes poll numbers down to about 47%. THE POPE!!!
Laser102
Jul 2015
#10
Yes, the Clinton campaign pushed back against a false and borderline libelous story
geek tragedy
Jul 2015
#19
And, they're accusing the person call them on it as "..fitting right in with the Stasi"..
Cha
Jul 2015
#52
You're not the only one who has noticed. "Why?" is a good question that will probably
Cha
Jul 2015
#51
Here is another link, but I have no doubt you will continue to believe the NY Times
still_one
Jul 2015
#57