Latest Breaking News

Cha

(297,190 posts)

52. And, they're accusing the person call them on it as "..fitting right in with the Stasi"..

Reply to geek tragedy (Reply #43)

Fri Jul 24, 2015, 07:21 PM

Jul 2015

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141154772#post2

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New York Times alters Clinton email story [View all] Freddie Stubbs Jul 2015 OP

CYA language. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #1

Passive voice in a headline and the lede? Android3.14 Jul 2015 #2

LOL. Beauregard Jul 2015 #12

Mistakes were made tularetom Jul 2015 #28

made up bullshit .... Hillary's emails, Behghazi, Swift Boats for Truth, and on and on Botany Jul 2015 #3

"Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account" is still on the table awake Jul 2015 #4

1st they say potato, then they say potahto, but they won't call the whole thing off. Divernan Jul 2015 #18

I think they should do a inquiry and put this to rest. DCBob Jul 2015 #5

The point is not to put anything to rest...there is nothing to put to rest. Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #6

^^This^^ Lisa D Jul 2015 #7

It's not just the republicans .. some on DU as well... just saying.... n/t cosmicone Jul 2015 #23

you know this how? uhnope Jul 2015 #24

Many updates debunking it. Even the NYT retracted their story. This is a 'Sorry, no cigar' thing. nt freshwest Jul 2015 #46

No, there was no retraction. Let's stick to the meaning of words. uhnope Jul 2015 #49

Words, huh? Partial retraction with a 64-page correction vs. the thrust of the article. Bye. n/t freshwest Jul 2015 #53

Intent doesn't particularly matter here. jeff47 Jul 2015 #13

There is no evidence that she mishandled classified information. Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #48

At the time that comment was written, the NYT report had not been debunked. jeff47 Jul 2015 #54

The basic information has been out there for months. Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #55

Basic information like a referral to the DoJ? jeff47 Jul 2015 #56

I am so sick of this crap. Do they really think HRC is dumb enough to asjr Jul 2015 #8

It's really easy to do. jeff47 Jul 2015 #14

I certainly agree with you. I just am so sick of asjr Jul 2015 #16

Dirty politics-that's today's game. jalan48 Jul 2015 #9

No one is safe. The Republicans managed to bring the Popes poll numbers down to about 47%. THE POPE!!! Laser102 Jul 2015 #10

This leaves room to blame it on Huma. Beauregard Jul 2015 #11

This would make a super episode on next season's VEEP. Divernan Jul 2015 #20

The Times altered the story "at Hillary's request." Beauregard Jul 2015 #15

Yes, the Clinton campaign pushed back against a false and borderline libelous story geek tragedy Jul 2015 #19

That is a real knee slapper! :) Beauregard Jul 2015 #21

All you do is spread rightwing talking points and engage in factually geek tragedy Jul 2015 #22

Post removed Post removed Jul 2015 #29

Are you beauregard? Kingofalldems Jul 2015 #32

Who is that? candelista Jul 2015 #33

Geek tragedy responded to Beauregard and you responded Kingofalldems Jul 2015 #35

I defended the poster against Geek's unfounded attacks. candelista Jul 2015 #39

Along with yourself I presume. Kingofalldems Jul 2015 #40

You can presume anything you want. candelista Jul 2015 #41

"So you can call me "rightwing" (sic) if you want to." geek tragedy Jul 2015 #43

hmmmmm BooScout Jul 2015 #45

And, they're accusing the person call them on it as "..fitting right in with the Stasi".. Cha Jul 2015 #52

Totally fallen Flat for the gop and anyone else who has a sad about it. Cha Jul 2015 #50

You're not the only one who has noticed. "Why?" is a good question that will probably Cha Jul 2015 #51

Story just fell apart. Too bad. Shucks. Kingofalldems Jul 2015 #30

Yeah, this is a real 'knee slapper.' NYT retracted it. LOL! n/t freshwest Jul 2015 #47

Not because the justice department said the story was garbage? still_one Jul 2015 #27

The justice department certainly did not say this. candelista Jul 2015 #31

Bullshit still_one Jul 2015 #34

Your link doesn't justify your epithet. candelista Jul 2015 #36

It won't matter you have convicted and executed still_one Jul 2015 #38

Here is another link, but I have no doubt you will continue to believe the NY Times still_one Jul 2015 #57

Good catch. Kingofalldems Jul 2015 #58

It is a scathing article about the competence of the NY Times still_one Jul 2015 #59

Boom! Kingofalldems Jul 2015 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author still_one Jul 2015 #42

Back at it I see. Kingofalldems Jul 2015 #17

Ouch! Ouch! False. Kingofalldems Jul 2015 #25

Maybe an apology for getting it wrong, since the justice department still_one Jul 2015 #26

Hahahaha! Looky here OP: Kingofalldems Jul 2015 #44