Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
43. Your post is downright offensive and accusing HRC of corruption
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 03:03 PM
Jul 2015

Clintons have been investigated by one body or another for 23 years and they haven't found anything criminal.

Your post is insulting to all of us who have known the Clintons all these years to be honest, hard-working and albeit ambitious people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Way to put yourself out there, Clinton. We'll get your answer on the issue after we elect you? Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #1
like Nixon's secret plan to end the Vietnam War? yurbud Jul 2015 #27
Hillary haters will still find a way to hate in 3...2...1 n/t cosmicone Jul 2015 #2
Do you seriously think that "I'll tell you my opinion on that after I'm President" Chakab Jul 2015 #9
It depends on how much a candidate wants to pander to the base Freddie Stubbs Jul 2015 #12
How is it pandering to take a position on something? blackspade Jul 2015 #38
Explaining your policy positions during an election is "pandering"? Chakab Jul 2015 #47
Only when republicans do it n/t arcane1 Jul 2015 #17
She is a former cabinet member to PBO cosmicone Jul 2015 #41
I hate to break this to you, but most people who fervently support the Keystone XL pipeline are Chakab Jul 2015 #46
Hillary is not a Marine. beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #57
She is not a veteran. tazkcmo Jul 2015 #66
It's an acceptable answer in "Hillary World." Ask Bernie a question, he gives you an answer - no pollsters, no political consultants, no triangulation, just a straight answer. InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #68
Because the desire to see a candidate with the courage to give an opinion is "hating"? fbc Jul 2015 #10
See post No. 41 n/t cosmicone Jul 2015 #42
I don't Flatpicker Jul 2015 #79
yes good for her - the sanders people are gonna be mad cause they want something to thump her with quizzle Jul 2015 #3
Nope. Bad analysis. We want her to oppose. We don't need more material for campaigns, we need Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #15
A candidate that won't speak directly and honestly to an issue of extreme importance Maedhros Jul 2015 #32
especially a segment looking for gotcha moments quizzle Jul 2015 #53
Like BLM? [n/t] Maedhros Jul 2015 #58
link? quizzle Jul 2015 #63
You seem to be of the opinion that Hillary is being unfairly criticized Maedhros Jul 2015 #65
im not arguing or debating and if bernie refused to answer any questions about kxl quizzle Jul 2015 #67
Hillary is being dishonest with us. Maedhros Jul 2015 #69
so youll vote for scott walker? you realize the next president could pick 3 supremes? quizzle Jul 2015 #73
That's why I won't vote for her. Autumn Jul 2015 #4
Remember Nixons secret plan to end the Vietnam war? tularetom Jul 2015 #5
McCain had a plan to get Bin Laden, but we had to elect him to hear about it. arcane1 Jul 2015 #8
Hah! Great minds. RufusTFirefly Jul 2015 #16
What a coward fbc Jul 2015 #6
Shhhh! Be vewy, vewy quiet. She has a secret Keystone plan RufusTFirefly Jul 2015 #7
The secret Keystone plan is... Maedhros Jul 2015 #34
If you aren't careful, you may forfeit your reservation for the Lincoln Bedroom! n/t RufusTFirefly Jul 2015 #37
Your post is downright offensive and accusing HRC of corruption cosmicone Jul 2015 #43
LMFAO L0oniX Jul 2015 #76
Who told you that? Rush? Hannity? O'Liellly?? riversedge Jul 2015 #49
No one "told me." Maedhros Jul 2015 #50
And that is PRECISELY what it is...."conjecture", totally lacking in facts. George II Jul 2015 #60
Are you accusing her of being corrupt? George II Jul 2015 #59
I will accuse her of corruption portlander23 Jul 2015 #81
Just sign it. We'll fill it in for you. That's called leadership. n/t jtuck004 Jul 2015 #11
Saying what you actually believe is "pandering"? n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2015 #13
People forget bluestateguy Jul 2015 #14
Obama didn't veto building KXL at all RufusTFirefly Jul 2015 #20
This really isn't LBN. That has been her position for some time, undecided still_one Jul 2015 #18
Shame on you! SoapBox Jul 2015 #19
Bill Clinton pulled the same shit with NAFTA. Fuddnik Jul 2015 #40
"If it is undecided when I become president, I will answer your question." geek tragedy Jul 2015 #21
I can only interpret that as an approval of KXL. arcane1 Jul 2015 #22
She can neither confirm a denial, nor deny a confirmation, but she recognizes geek tragedy Jul 2015 #24
Perfect response! peacebird Jul 2015 #33
nah, its about her corporate connections. Amishman Jul 2015 #39
Pretty arrogant presumption ... GeorgeGist Jul 2015 #25
that part is standard for people running. They get introduced as "the next President of the geek tragedy Jul 2015 #26
i noticed that too. nt restorefreedom Jul 2015 #61
Measuring drapes? GeorgeGist Jul 2015 #23
Pretty arrogant if you ask me. Bernie demonstrates, once again, how to answer a simple question. InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #70
This is a very straight forward question and deserves a straight answer randr Jul 2015 #28
"I want to wait and see what he and Secretary Kerry decide." MADem Jul 2015 #29
Thank you LoveMyCali Jul 2015 #75
Isn't not pandering to the base, any base or party, a good thing? Well and fully explained, Madame Clinton. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #30
I agree. She shouldn't answer any question on any matter that might be resolved before the election Android3.14 Jul 2015 #31
Where's the leadership in that?! InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #71
Exactly Android3.14 Jul 2015 #77
I got your "double" sarcasm (I think) Android and, actually, was agreeing with you. hahaha InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #80
That was a dodge. blackspade Jul 2015 #35
Not having a stance on this issue is as bad as a negative stance. n/t RoccoR5955 Jul 2015 #36
She answered. yallerdawg Jul 2015 #44
It doesn'tmake sense to fight Keystone pipeline unless those opposing is happier with the Thinkingabout Jul 2015 #54
It Will Be bucolic_frolic Jul 2015 #45
And the Donald will tell us sadoldgirl Jul 2015 #48
no dodging restorefreedom Jul 2015 #51
OK Hillary tell us how much you stand to gain financially should it be built? Vincardog Jul 2015 #52
Because discussing something that could destroy the global ecosystem is "pandering", right? NickB79 Jul 2015 #55
Sorry. I'm not a faith based voter. beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #56
+100 nt restorefreedom Jul 2015 #62
this was her bill buckner moment restorefreedom Jul 2015 #64
But she can't answer this question that would reveal if she puts corporations or people first!!!! fbc Jul 2015 #72
It revealed she puts Hillary Clinton first. n/t hughee99 Jul 2015 #74
Do I really have to say it for her? Corporations are people too. L0oniX Jul 2015 #78
We know the answer. Enthusiast Jul 2015 #82
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton won't ans...»Reply #43