Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,956 posts)
18. I never thought that likely
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:54 PM
May 2012

It was pretty common knowledge that Edwards was pretty uncooperative in 2004. In a NYT article in 2006, Edwards even prided himself on not giving up his principles - and explained he refused to use Kerry's slogan of "help is on the way" preferring his own "hope is on the way". Ignoring that Kerry's slogan actually makes more sense - because "hope" always can come before something is there - so hope is on the way is very wishy washy - "hope" is good, but only when it is present! - this is NOT standing up for principles. It is being a primma donna and not accepting that he was in a supporting position.

Kerry was very good about not ever saying anything negative about Edwards, there is no way that he would not have given Obama an honest assessment if asked - and it is very hard to believe if Obama ever seriously considered Edwards that he wouldn't ask.

In addition, a couple of areas where Obama could use support was in foreign policy - not an Edwards' strength and in having someone with a lot of experience. Edwards had less time in elected office than Obama.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Whew. Arugula Latte May 2012 #1
Maybe, but I'm not sure they would have tried someone that was chosen four years earlier. n/t Dawgs May 2012 #2
I never thought that likely karynnj May 2012 #18
That headline almost makes it sound like the President is somehow complicit groundloop May 2012 #3
Don't count anything out. JDPriestly May 2012 #4
are you STILL shifting the blame. what a fuckin hoot.... nt seabeyond May 2012 #6
Read the article. JDPriestly May 2012 #7
i dont care. i dont care he fuck on his wife. i care he knew it was there, would come out and ran seabeyond May 2012 #8
I have explained this many times. JDPriestly May 2012 #9
wht you would like, and what is reality are two different things. doesnt matter a man fuckin on his seabeyond May 2012 #10
wow. you're not dealing with reality. cali May 2012 #12
I see you've managed to work Obama, negatively, into your narrative while trying to polish the turd Tarheel_Dem May 2012 #24
I tend to agree DearAbby May 2012 #13
Thanks, DearAbby. JDPriestly May 2012 #16
John Edwards wooed and used Mellon because she had money, and would give crunch60 May 2012 #11
"He couldn't control his penis". he could control. he didnt care. he was more important seabeyond May 2012 #14
Edwards received money from Bunny Mellon because she liked him. JDPriestly May 2012 #17
Spin it whatever way you want, Edwards used a lonely old lady crunch60 May 2012 #19
Why should we believe what Hoffman says Edwards said any more than we JDPriestly May 2012 #20
Bullshit! And you don't have to tell me about rich peoples friendships, I have know more than crunch60 May 2012 #22
she was 97 at the time and she did not know that money was going to his mistress cali May 2012 #21
Her lawyer's testimony says she wanted to give the money to him. JDPriestly May 2012 #23
that is what pissed all of us off. a critical time, edwards ego ruled over us. he ran seabeyond May 2012 #5
even without the affair i don't think he would have seriously been considered for anything JI7 May 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Edwards donor says he tol...»Reply #18