Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Black Lives Matter protesters try to disrupt Hillary Clinton event Read more: http://www.politico.c [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)56. Yes. I can name three: Patrisse Cullors. Opal Tometi. Alicia Garza.
They are the founders of the movement.
As to your questions, the movement is not entirely decentralized--they have a unified web page, a facebook page (where a lot of angry Sanders supporters are making fools of themselves), a twitter account, and they've been at this for three years, now. You can find the answers to many of your questions HERE: http://blacklivesmatter.com/ and they even have a contact page.
Symone Sanders self-identifies as a SUPPORTER, not an activist for the movement. She had a paying job at Public Citizen.
Her current job is incompatible with being an activist for the organization:
http://blacklivesmatter.com/blacklivesmatter-statement-on-political-affiliations/
#BlackLivesMatter Statement on Political Affiliations
by BlackLivesMatter | Aug 10, 2015 | Press Releases, Uncategorized | 0 comments
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 9, 2015
At this time, #BlackLivesMatter does not endorse any presidential candidate. Moreover, we are not affiliated with a political party. Our work is not funded or driven by any political party nor is it influenced by local or national candidates.
As stated in our mission, #BlackLivesMatter is an ideological and political intervention; we are not controlled by the same political machine we are attempting to hold accountable. In the year leading up to the elections, we are committed to holding all candidates for Office accountable to the needs and dreams of Black people. We embrace a diversity of tactics. We are a decentralized network aiming to build the leadership and power of black people. We do not endorse any political party and we are not supported by any political party. Our political aims weve stated clearly.
Historically, all political parties have participated in the systematic disenfranchisement of Black people. Anti-black racism, especially that sanctioned by the state, has resulted in the loss of healthy and thriving Black life and well-being. Given that, we will continue to hold politicians and political parties accountable for their policies and platforms. We will also continue to demand the intentional dismantling of structural racism.
For more information about #BlackLivesMatter nationally, please visit the official website at www.blacklivesmatter.com, follow @BlkLivesMatter on Twitter, or visit the Facebook page here.
#BlackLivesMatter Statement on Political Affiliations
by BlackLivesMatter | Aug 10, 2015 | Press Releases, Uncategorized | 0 comments
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 9, 2015
At this time, #BlackLivesMatter does not endorse any presidential candidate. Moreover, we are not affiliated with a political party. Our work is not funded or driven by any political party nor is it influenced by local or national candidates.
As stated in our mission, #BlackLivesMatter is an ideological and political intervention; we are not controlled by the same political machine we are attempting to hold accountable. In the year leading up to the elections, we are committed to holding all candidates for Office accountable to the needs and dreams of Black people. We embrace a diversity of tactics. We are a decentralized network aiming to build the leadership and power of black people. We do not endorse any political party and we are not supported by any political party. Our political aims weve stated clearly.
Historically, all political parties have participated in the systematic disenfranchisement of Black people. Anti-black racism, especially that sanctioned by the state, has resulted in the loss of healthy and thriving Black life and well-being. Given that, we will continue to hold politicians and political parties accountable for their policies and platforms. We will also continue to demand the intentional dismantling of structural racism.
For more information about #BlackLivesMatter nationally, please visit the official website at www.blacklivesmatter.com, follow @BlkLivesMatter on Twitter, or visit the Facebook page here.
They didn't just spring up out of nowhere. It's just that white America hasn't bothered to pay attention to them up to now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Black Lives Matter protesters try to disrupt Hillary Clinton event Read more: http://www.politico.c [View all]
OneCrazyDiamond
Aug 2015
OP
If they are serious about getting action quickly, they need to address the President and the White
JDPriestly
Aug 2015
#10
+1. The candidates, whoever they are won't be in power for 2 yrs. as you say.
appalachiablue
Aug 2015
#25
It is an emergency, and if this were a priority in the Obama administration, it would not have
JDPriestly
Aug 2015
#44
"They" want to interrupt her speech? Those women don't represent "Black Americans."
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#28
Of course. Try reading my post again. Those women only speak for themselves. n/t
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#71
It's a great question. Pressure on existing government officials would seem logical.
jalan48
Aug 2015
#40
Trust me, some people will still believe that she did and that they showed up late on purpose
cstanleytech
Aug 2015
#16
They'll probably be early next time, especially if the meeting didn't go the way they
MADem
Aug 2015
#27
I think the Hillary behind this idea is rather crazy. I'm glad she met with the potential
JDPriestly
Aug 2015
#46
Some venues can afford an awful lot of security with the Secret Service...
MrMickeysMom
Aug 2015
#80
Gee, I wonder if these BLM folks were aware that they're actually tools of Hillary's campaign nt
MrScorpio
Aug 2015
#2
The Democratic Party OWES black voters BIG TIME. The party must do better. n/t
freshwest
Aug 2015
#41
The ENTIRE Democratic Party still OWES for decades of black support. Period. n/t
freshwest
Aug 2015
#76
Wha' ? A candidate for the Democratic nomination met with BLM protesters? Oh the horror!
George II
Aug 2015
#4
They have a national committee and chapters. They have hired staff. They have a funding stream.
MADem
Aug 2015
#91
Here is one link. I think Bernie also met with them earlier, but I'm not sure.
JDPriestly
Aug 2015
#81
"Black Lives Matter Activists Open Massive Bernie Sanders Rally in Los Angeles"
Comrade Grumpy
Aug 2015
#9
At least Bernie is out there at large public venues and O'Malley is trying.
appalachiablue
Aug 2015
#31
I provided you with a contact page--you can ask the question directly. No need for a middleman.
MADem
Aug 2015
#65
You are the one who dismissed Bernie's press secretary as a supporter and not a member
Bjorn Against
Aug 2015
#69
You have the power. You refuse to use it. Thanks for being so blatant. Makes it easy to
MADem
Aug 2015
#78
Sans the snark, that would have been an excellent post I wanted to applaud. n/t
freshwest
Aug 2015
#58
which candidate would that be? Because Sanders did meet w/BLM representatives and hired
magical thyme
Aug 2015
#50
I won't take this group seriously until they disrupt a Rethuglican candidate's event.
Crowman1979
Aug 2015
#12
Thats why BLM will fail then because this country has 2 major political parties and not one
cstanleytech
Aug 2015
#18
Really? Wouldn't It Make It Perfectly Clear To The American People In General That....
global1
Aug 2015
#19
Exactly. It probably wont affect their base but any major negative action by the GOP that
cstanleytech
Aug 2015
#23
That's why they need to be forced to address it. Otherwise it looks like a game of "Yes, but..."
arcane1
Aug 2015
#37