Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Now, why would you do that unless you had something to hide. CanonRay Aug 2015 #1
No Authentic Elections In US Since 1996 billhicks76 Aug 2015 #24
+1000000000000000000000 2naSalit Aug 2015 #29
BIG, BIG Problem! tech3149 Aug 2015 #33
I Bet Some Big Name Democrats Threatened To Expose billhicks76 Aug 2015 #53
I firmly believe they did work out some deal. I think Howard Dean and Ted Lamont both appeared GoneFishin Aug 2015 #63
The Silence Is Weird billhicks76 Aug 2015 #68
False identities and subterfuge actually are a thing. They do exist. Enthusiast Aug 2015 #71
No stretch at all. Spying and sabotage have been around forever. And right wingers are not limited GoneFishin Aug 2015 #77
One year I worked with another election judge who admitted she was really a repub, not a dem. CrispyQ Aug 2015 #78
+ a gazillion!!! valerief Aug 2015 #58
Ding! Winnah! Raster Aug 2015 #69
Imagine the media outrage if this was a Democratic SoS?! Roland99 Aug 2015 #2
The 'report' would be in heavy rotation on every 'news' channel…..if it was a Dem SoS. blm Aug 2015 #5
That is behavior typical of sociopaths. Lying and cheating are as natural to them as breathing. Cal33 Aug 2015 #44
Weasels. nt bemildred Aug 2015 #3
Unless you’re hiding something, what possible reason could you give for blocking the release? dorkzilla Aug 2015 #4
Costs money to do that. He's exhibiting fiscal conservatism! Roland99 Aug 2015 #8
They are hiding something.... usaf-vet Aug 2015 #6
Next stop-they've been accidentally deleted. jalan48 Aug 2015 #7
Or partial release: where "sensitive information" has been filtered out. n/t Betty Karlson Aug 2015 #60
You could be right. It looks more cooperative to give them bad data than none at all. GoneFishin Aug 2015 #64
"supplying the voting logs is “unnecessarily burdensome” because they’re hard to copy." think Aug 2015 #9
"Logs are heavy." GoneFishin Aug 2015 #65
Okay, that made me lol. CrispyQ Aug 2015 #79
DUZY! (nt) apnu Aug 2015 #82
"My dog ate them." GoneFishin Aug 2015 #66
It would behoove Kobach and the Kansas GOP to release the voting machine logs. KansDem Aug 2015 #10
hey it takes a lot of time and effort to fake those logs! 0rganism Aug 2015 #28
Dear Kansas children and parents. If you are sitting in a math class, either there is something to jtuck004 Aug 2015 #11
someone may be registering people who never vote and mailing in groups of votes. Sunlei Aug 2015 #12
Seems legit. AzDar Aug 2015 #13
The Koch Brothers ANOIS Aug 2015 #14
I'm located about 2 minutes away from Koch Central, the US headquarters Stevepol Aug 2015 #20
From what I have heard and read even the republicans in Kansas don't like Brownback Botany Aug 2015 #39
Precisely. Enthusiast Aug 2015 #80
Our instant gratification society doesn't help. And the media? CrispyQ Aug 2015 #81
Problem with increased Republican votes in larger precincts Hannahcares Aug 2015 #15
"This is a huge potential problem for the 2016 elections." <--THIS nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #35
I believe some of Clarkson's work also showed an unusual vote pattern for Wisconsin too Botany Aug 2015 #16
I think the Kochs have an office there also. glinda Aug 2015 #50
Yeah they do. We call it "The Capitol." Scuba Aug 2015 #67
Don't forget Waukesha County Bettie Aug 2015 #73
Poisoned water and now they want the Lake's water..... glinda Aug 2015 #90
I'd say the Kochs et al... Jerry442 Aug 2015 #17
Looks like Kansas needs to do what Wisconsin has already done. staggerleem Aug 2015 #18
Saw that in the Wichita Eagle this morning- KrazyinKS Aug 2015 #19
Glad to see someone is digging. Ms. Clarkson has maybe noticed something a little iffy? Tatiana Aug 2015 #21
Shades of Ohio in 2004 chapdrum Aug 2015 #22
+1! snot Aug 2015 #42
Prediction . . . markpkessinger Aug 2015 #23
Unfortunately, I expect you're right tech3149 Aug 2015 #34
The Kansas SC still has some decent judges left over from Democratic administrations. That tblue37 Aug 2015 #40
I would really much prefer to be wrong . . . markpkessinger Aug 2015 #55
Sound prediction. Enthusiast Aug 2015 #72
Really.... blackspade Aug 2015 #25
Seems awfully strange not only is this kacekwl Aug 2015 #26
Wasserman's already working overtime 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #37
Her top priority is to keep progressives out. Republicans come in third. nm rhett o rick Aug 2015 #45
the woman is usless dorkzilla Aug 2015 #54
OK you posters down Wichita way MuseRider Aug 2015 #27
Hmmm...... maybe...... Turbineguy Aug 2015 #30
Kobach is only interested in voter fraud, not election fraud. Two completely different things. LonePirate Aug 2015 #31
This is the tiny tip a very ugly iceberg 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #32
To protect corporatist Democratic incumbents from awkward primary challenges from the left. tblue37 Aug 2015 #38
... in Kansas. apnu Aug 2015 #83
No--this nonsense goes on all over the country. The woman who spotted the hinky discrepancy tblue37 Aug 2015 #91
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Aug 2015 #36
What are Rebl Aug 2015 #41
K&R'D!!! snot Aug 2015 #43
This is a great article but may meet the definition of a Conspiracy Theory. rhett o rick Aug 2015 #46
I wish they'd check Texas Voting Machine records. Unknown Beatle Aug 2015 #47
FL as well. /sigh. nashville_brook Aug 2015 #88
Thanks to everyone for your posts sketchy Aug 2015 #48
kick n/t sketchy Aug 2015 #49
PLEASE let this get the attention it deserves. nt SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #51
I wish the professor all of the luck in the world but the lawsuit has little chance Gothmog Aug 2015 #52
K&R (N/T) Old Crow Aug 2015 #56
Kicking! n/t veness Aug 2015 #57
I think polls are also being manipulated Lodestar Aug 2015 #59
Of course they are. SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #93
Going to take some people who never registered to vote, to check and find out..'someone' registered Sunlei Aug 2015 #61
what percent of the USA population never votes? 30%? or is it even higher? Sunlei Aug 2015 #62
This story is HUGE, and needs to go NATIONAL ASAP! TrollBuster9090 Aug 2015 #70
Rat bastard. lonestarnot Aug 2015 #75
Thanks for posting this. This shit is important. beerandjesus Aug 2015 #74
K & R, sketchy! But of course, the larger the precinct the higher the republican steal...it's the mother earth Aug 2015 #76
That's right They_Live Aug 2015 #87
Where theres smoke... workinclasszero Aug 2015 #84
Now why would someone object the the release of this boring, boring data? Vinca Aug 2015 #85
Crooking it big time! d_legendary1 Aug 2015 #86
holycrap. just not going to give up the voting records...the most fundamental proof of democracy nashville_brook Aug 2015 #89
What counts the votes? RobertEarl Aug 2015 #92
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Kobach and Sedgwick Count...»Reply #86