Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Kentucky Clerk Once Again Denies Gay Marriage License, Despite Federal Order [View all]Botany
(77,904 posts)2. Time to fire her ass

A panel of federal appeals judges refused to overrule a judge's injunction against Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis, who continues to refuse marriage licenses for same-sex couples more than a month after the U.S. Supreme Court found a constitutional right to marry.
Three judges with the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied Davis' request for a stay on Wednesday, writing that her official duties include issuing the forms and that the Supreme Court has already said states cannot bar same-sex couples from marriage.
"It cannot be defensibly argued that the holder of the Rowan County Clerks office, apart from who personally occupies that office, may decline to act in conformity with the United States Constitution as interpreted by a dispositive holding of the United States Supreme Court," the judges wrote. "There is thus little or no likelihood that the clerk in her official capacity will prevail on appeal."
http://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/2015/08/26/appeals-court-denies-stay-rowan-co-clerk/32426123/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kentucky Clerk Once Again Denies Gay Marriage License, Despite Federal Order [View all]
DonViejo
Aug 2015
OP
There is no right to "not be offended". She holds that over peoples REAL rights.
Elmer S. E. Dump
Aug 2015
#5
Well, now that she has intentionally not followed a federal order couldn't she be arrested for
4lbs
Aug 2015
#6
Yes indeed. The only way to stop these children in adult bodies from acting out is to
randys1
Aug 2015
#26
Thank you. So Monday she can be arrested for contempt of court? Or fined. Good.
uppityperson
Aug 2015
#18
So if she hasn't been fired yet, her boss isn't compliant and the feds need to do something to both.
ancianita
Aug 2015
#20
When she breaks federal court orders, there should be recourse for immediate dismissal.
ancianita
Aug 2015
#22
Thanks, but I'd need to be a lawyer to pick the relevant clauses that any court order can override.
ancianita
Aug 2015
#32
Doesn't this fall under 'Seperation of church and state'?? at the very least
Angry Dragon
Aug 2015
#27
Fire her or charge her with contempt of court and slam her ass in jail...
awoke_in_2003
Aug 2015
#34
I am sure she is the one that has been. Designated to bring this to the Supreme Court
world wide wally
Aug 2015
#41