Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

villager

(26,001 posts)

1. The Earth-molesters are gonna hate that!

Reply to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Fri Sep 4, 2015, 05:53 PM

Sep 2015

Good!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge: Injunction against water rule limited to 13 states [View all] Judi Lynn Sep 2015 OP

The Earth-molesters are gonna hate that! villager Sep 2015 #1

Other states can seek to intervene in the current case branford Sep 2015 #2

EPA "overreach" as in "protecting the environment?" villager Sep 2015 #3

"Overreach" means acting without authority, nothing more, nothing less. branford Sep 2015 #4

Essentially, you don't want no gubmint telling you what you can do with a stream. villager Sep 2015 #6

I think you need to complain to the Supreme Court about EPA authority, not me. branford Sep 2015 #7

And what are these bad "ends" the EPA is after, that have caused liberal ol' you... villager Sep 2015 #10

It sounded more like they explaining why the EPA does not have the legal authority under the law to cstanleytech Sep 2015 #8

It sounds like they were explaining the ruling only pertains to the states which brought the suit villager Sep 2015 #9

Yes, and I explained in my earlier posts that this limitation may soon end branford Sep 2015 #11

It may, it may not. villager Sep 2015 #12

Sounds like he's on the side of Igel Sep 2015 #13

Exactly. branford Sep 2015 #14

Sounds like you and your fellow conservatives trump-et "rule of law" when its conservative, villager Sep 2015 #15

Potential EPA regulatory overreach often targets small landowners and branford Sep 2015 #16

I guess the question is -- what do *you* personally have against this aspect of the Clean Water act? villager Sep 2015 #17

Who's gutting the Clean Water Act or the EPA? Not me. branford Sep 2015 #18

The more you obfuscate, the longer your posts get, the more you're running. villager Sep 2015 #19

I have no intention of getting into a long and detailed examination branford Sep 2015 #20

"I have no intention of revealing my conservative views on environmental regulation" villager Sep 2015 #21

Ah, that's for confirming that you have absolutely nothing to offfer branford Sep 2015 #23

"Ah, that's for confirming that you have absolutely nothing to offfer" villager Sep 2015 #24

Ignoring the law ShrimpPoboy Sep 2015 #22

I don't know the details here, but we're just beginning the scrabble for diminishing fresh water. Hortensis Sep 2015 #5

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge: Injunction against...»Reply #1