Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
50. Reposting this for your benefit
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 05:27 PM
Sep 2015

The intelligence community’s inspector general had previously identified four e-mails out of a sample of 40 that had been sent on her server and contained classified information, including two that involved top-secret information. In those cases, however, people who have reviewed the e-mails said that Clinton did not write them.


...

In several exchanges, Verveer forwarded Clinton accounts of confidential reports from Foreign Service officers giving updates from their posts. She shared long notes from the U.S. ambassador to Bangladesh describing what he learned in a private dinner with senior officials in that country amid a major embezzlement scandal.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-wrote-classified-e-mails-sent-using-private-server/2015/09/01/5d456616-50bd-11e5-8c19-0b6825aa4a3a_story.html

Its worth noting that it doesn't matter who wrote the e-mails. All that matters is how the sensitive content was handled.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She was allowed to hold classified material on her private server? TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #1
Investigation has found NO classified material on her private server. Hortensis Sep 2015 #14
the server was wiped clean. are there any further facts regarding Karma13612 Sep 2015 #20
Like, with a cloth? philosslayer Sep 2015 #40
Yeah, Kelvin Mace Sep 2015 #44
Are we really taking ourselves that seriously? philosslayer Sep 2015 #60
It was damn sure a smart ass remark!! pocoloco Sep 2015 #86
The FBI concluded its investigation? TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #22
That's news to me...didn't know Hillary was cleared of all wrongdoing. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2015 #77
You better let the DNI IG know, since he found otherwise. (nt) jeff47 Sep 2015 #34
That doesn't seem to be the case. At least not according to this article: Bubzer Sep 2015 #46
That's not true. The emails did contain classified material. Yo_Mama Sep 2015 #85
Give it up...Get with the program. FarPoint Sep 2015 #25
Like Joe Lieberman, Kelvin Mace Sep 2015 #45
Keep repeating those lies liberal N proud Sep 2015 #76
another example of tone deaf politics. she's hopeless roguevalley Sep 2015 #95
another example of tone deaf politics. she's hopeless roguevalley Sep 2015 #96
Vote for Hillary: What She Did Was Allowed! tularetom Sep 2015 #2
she apologized for the supposed confusion over her emails. not for the private, unsecure magical thyme Sep 2015 #7
yup, my thoughts exactly. Karma13612 Sep 2015 #21
Bypassing the official route was not just allowed, but commonly done by many. Hortensis Sep 2015 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalArkie Sep 2015 #29
Are you saying Hillary has done wrong and has been immoral cosmicone Sep 2015 #39
I think this more saying that her actions are worth scrutiny because she is a lawyer. Bubzer Sep 2015 #47
I am sorry, you are probably correct. They have never done anything just for the sake of the money. LiberalArkie Sep 2015 #51
Now THAT'S a Bumper Sticker I'd proudly stick on my rear end! HappyPlace Sep 2015 #55
Flip flop apologize apologized apolocalypse? L0oniX Sep 2015 #58
Maybe Hillary's sorry she apologized? InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2015 #78
Ya know, if she'd said 'I screwed up, I'm sorry'... this would have been old dead news after about Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #3
You really think the right-wing political-media-ideological machine cheapdate Sep 2015 #10
or the left wing political idiological machine running in full hound mode lol nt msongs Sep 2015 #13
She didn't screw up, but I happen to have a bridge for sale if anyone is interested. Hortensis Sep 2015 #16
IMO, they'd rather stay on the email issue rather than have the focus switch to other Skwmom Sep 2015 #27
Interesting hypothesis. Gonna have to think on that one. Bubzer Sep 2015 #48
You are right. Americans 840high Sep 2015 #32
The only way it would have been "allowed" would be if the President gave her an EO or PPD to do it. leveymg Sep 2015 #4
That's the right answer... TipTok Sep 2015 #89
Yeah, I think it was - OhZone Sep 2015 #5
Those activities predated the '09 Executive Order that made these communications presumed classified leveymg Sep 2015 #8
Parse her words carefully. She said "allowed". nt antigop Sep 2015 #9
Allowed as opposed to permitted. Good point. But, only to a point leveymg Sep 2015 #12
Good luck with that.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #19
The polls wouldn't seem to support your conclusion. It's not just GOP and leveymg Sep 2015 #61
au contraire VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #63
That must be why she's crumbling in the NH & IA polls. leveymg Sep 2015 #75
Crumbling? Among states that are Predominantly white? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #80
Yet there wasno breach of law cavalier or otherwise.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #83
It's a non-issue ... it only exists in the minds of HRC haters cosmicone Sep 2015 #42
Don't have to hate Hillary to be concerned about it. Bubzer Sep 2015 #49
apparently you do actually.....Republicans and Sanders supporters... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #64
Thats an interesting claim. Could you share the link supporting that? Bubzer Sep 2015 #65
Sure I can...hold on... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #66
Very interesting. A more recent article seems to refute this. Bubzer Sep 2015 #67
the retroactive classified emails....didn't generate FROM her... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #68
The article I linked to doesn't mention retroactive classified documents. Bubzer Sep 2015 #69
You must have missed it....because that is exactly what happened... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #70
It would be fantastic if you could post the relevant passage. Thanks in advance. Bubzer Sep 2015 #71
No I am not doing YOUR homework.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #72
The article I posted is more recent than yours. Your articles might not be relevent anymore Bubzer Sep 2015 #73
What do you want something from yesterday? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #82
I think you missread your sources. One is March 4th, 2015... the other is August 12, 2015. Bubzer Sep 2015 #91
No need to be sorry - OhZone Sep 2015 #6
Agree. cheapdate Sep 2015 #11
No need for an apology! Moving on. Too much time has been spent on mfcorey1 Sep 2015 #17
And what? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #18
This fake issue is all republicans have on a person who has spent decades working in our Government Sunlei Sep 2015 #23
You serious? Puzzledtraveller Sep 2015 #81
Bill allowed her to install it in their home? Geronimoe Sep 2015 #24
When I asked a friend if they were allowed to send classified information over an unsecured system Skwmom Sep 2015 #26
Who is this "they?" murielm99 Sep 2015 #31
You do realize that there are rules for handling classified information that apply to EVERYONE Skwmom Sep 2015 #38
There was nothing classified on her server contempraneously. End of story. cosmicone Sep 2015 #43
Reposting this for your benefit Bubzer Sep 2015 #50
If she can't handle the simple stuff... TipTok Sep 2015 #90
We should expect the same competence and intelligence murielm99 Sep 2015 #92
isn't that exactly what Romney said in '12? MisterP Sep 2015 #28
It's Howdy Gowdy Time! for certain Sanders supporters above. Metric System Sep 2015 #30
It might be 'bye-bye time for Hillary. 840high Sep 2015 #33
Keep the hope alive! Metric System Sep 2015 #35
Like Bush supporters, HRC supporters have no problem with avoiding oversight. OnyxCollie Sep 2015 #62
My son was allowed to use the family car Geronimoe Sep 2015 #36
Ownership of actions is laudable... though is often a career ender in politics. Bubzer Sep 2015 #52
"It's a PARTISAN distraction -- like Benghazi -- and it wasn't illegal. rocktivity Sep 2015 #37
Good for her! BadGimp Sep 2015 #41
" What I did was allowed?" SusanaMontana41 Sep 2015 #53
This big story from the link: antiquie Sep 2015 #54
There's a huge difference between what's "allowed" and what's "right." nichomachus Sep 2015 #56
"repost in the Hillary Group" = instant block. L0oniX Sep 2015 #57
I agree with Hillary on this, but that doesn't mean she can beat Trump. fbc Sep 2015 #59
Establishment Democrats would rather have a Republican than Bernie Sanders I suspect Fumesucker Sep 2015 #93
She's in Iowa, again? Major Hogwash Sep 2015 #74
I find her limited... Mike Nelson Sep 2015 #79
Checkers Speech BaronChocula Sep 2015 #84
It's too bad she didn't play this better. n/t Gore1FL Sep 2015 #87
These BS attacks against Hillary on DU remind me of a certain sitting President flamingdem Sep 2015 #88
No, the threat is the collapse of the democratic party fbc Sep 2015 #94
Obama is not very different from Hillary in that respect flamingdem Sep 2015 #97
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton says no email apo...»Reply #50