Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ford_Prefect

(8,039 posts)
13. If you read each question and the listed respondents for each the numbers get much smaller.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:23 AM
Sep 2015

1012 did not respond to all of the questions or even to the majority of questions.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/09/10/demsclinton.pdf

for example:


BASED ON 259 REGISTERED VOTERS WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS DEMOCRATS AND 136 REGISTERED VOTERS WHO DESCRIBED THEMSELVES AS INDEPENDENTS WHO LEAN DEMOCRATIC, FOR A TOTAL OF 395 REGISTERED DEMOCRATS-- (SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 5% PTS.)

4. How enthusiastic would you say you are about voting for president in next year’s election--
extremely enthusiastic, very enthusiastic, somewhat enthusiastic, not too enthusiastic, or not at all enthusiastic?


Please note that I do not dispute the results of the poll. I question whether so small a selection is actually representative, and yes I have taken statistics and have done polling. I think CNN is frequently a bit remiss in these matters and often shows a particular preference for their version of status quo and pop culture myths. They rarely ask the truly hard questions and often seem to go out of their way to uphold a variety of cultural stereotypes.
Not a Hillary supporter, but... TDale313 Sep 2015 #1
I think Biden takes more votes numerically from Clinton but has a greater impact on Sanders. Attorney in Texas Sep 2015 #2
Biden is already getting most attention now, but as we go along here... Pauldg47 Sep 2015 #17
If Biden runs, he and Sanders split the support of those voters who are uncomfortable with Clinton. Attorney in Texas Sep 2015 #21
Its an interesting poll but rather small numbers making up the respondants. Ford_Prefect Sep 2015 #3
CNN's polling methodology is crap. onehandle Sep 2015 #6
I once worked for Harris Polls and have seen the differences. CNN cannot be taken seriously. Ford_Prefect Sep 2015 #7
The sample size was 1012 people. former9thward Sep 2015 #12
If you read each question and the listed respondents for each the numbers get much smaller. Ford_Prefect Sep 2015 #13
Yeah, I agree. former9thward Sep 2015 #15
Not buying it. What a crock. I can't imagine any thinking woman voting for Trump. Laser102 Sep 2015 #4
You aren't including the non-thinking women. They are usually married to non-thinking men. Elmer S. E. Dump Sep 2015 #8
Hillary is losing women to Ben Carson? Sorry, I don't get that at all. bklyncowgirl Sep 2015 #5
You know what they say about going black, right? Elmer S. E. Dump Sep 2015 #9
And I completely don't believe it. BigDemVoter Sep 2015 #19
Please... landolfi Sep 2015 #10
Well, a large percentage of Clinton supporters here claim their support jeff47 Sep 2015 #11
Elections are a year away? fbc Sep 2015 #14
The horse race polling now tells us little about who will win the nomination but it tells us much Attorney in Texas Sep 2015 #23
Media's been slamming her 24/7, so no wonder. lark Sep 2015 #16
I totally believe Sanders has overtaken Clinton. BigDemVoter Sep 2015 #18
Quick, DWS! Eliminate the debates ENTIRELY! That ought to ensure closeupready Sep 2015 #20
Got that right. qstick Sep 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton's lead over Sande...»Reply #13