Latest Breaking News

PDittie

(8,322 posts)

18. I believe that premise is false.

Reply to SunSeeker (Reply #14)

Fri Sep 25, 2015, 08:42 PM

Sep 2015

And I believe it grows more false with each passing day.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Officials Uncover Two Chains Of Emails Hillary Clinton Didn't Turn Over [View all] Purveyor Sep 2015 OP

Non-story! RufusTFirefly Sep 2015 #1

As long as she wasn't auditioning to be his biographer....n/t 24601 Sep 2015 #2

Hah! RufusTFirefly Sep 2015 #13

Actually it IS bad - It's Petraeus, after all, he was in charge at Benghazi and directing blm Sep 2015 #9

...or something along that line. Wilms Sep 2015 #12

I'm not sure what the fuss is about. TrollBuster9090 Sep 2015 #26

She's already busted with the bloomenthal emails. Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 #34

Molehill + Faux GOP Outrage = Mountain blm Sep 2015 #71

I couldn't care less geek75 Sep 2015 #3

The question is increasingly one of electability starroute Sep 2015 #10

None of the Dem candidates are more electable than Hillary. SunSeeker Sep 2015 #14

not just the con but du-ers are pushing this meme along saturnsring Sep 2015 #16

I believe that premise is false. PDittie Sep 2015 #18

Exactly the same playbook as Al Gore in 2000. 6000eliot Sep 2015 #29

Bernie is more electable than Hillary. cui bono Sep 2015 #41

Not only more electable Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 #57

None of the Dem candidates are more electable than Kerry. frylock Sep 2015 #73

What a low bar... TipTok Sep 2015 #74

We'll be hearing more about comparsions of negative numbers Babel_17 Sep 2015 #46

It has already Kilgore Sep 2015 #49

My thoughts exactly. gvstn Sep 2015 #11

Now that's what I call a limp endorsement! Lychee2 Sep 2015 #17

Hillary has a likability issue. gvstn Sep 2015 #22

it's hard to take anyone in DC's outrage on this seriously when they look the other way for war yurbud Sep 2015 #77

She has a perfectly good excuse: HooptieWagon Sep 2015 #4

woof-woof. 840high Sep 2015 #7

"Chain, chain, chain..." C Moon Sep 2015 #5

Well played ! WheelWalker Sep 2015 #8

Just heard it on ABS nightly news. 840high Sep 2015 #6

At what fucking point DOES it become a story??? catnhatnh Sep 2015 #15

You missed the part where the head of the cia is mailing your homebrew server Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 #60

State Department cull? Lychee2 Sep 2015 #19

The State Department wasn't required to turn over all 55,000 pages of email from Clinton's server. TrollBuster9090 Sep 2015 #24

Right, the headline is misleading. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #25

Well, sort of. TrollBuster9090 Sep 2015 #27

Surely you don't mean this: Lychee2 Sep 2015 #31

I'm just going by the State Department's unofficial statement as to why they didn't include them TrollBuster9090 Sep 2015 #37

:) The original subpoena asked for info about Libya, not just Benghazi. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #38

"No evidence"? There is PLENTY of evidence. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #53

This is out of Kerry's hands Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 #44

No it isn't. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #51

He's in the Obama administration Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 #56

Kerry CORRECTLY both pushed the department to cooperate karynnj Sep 2015 #50

karynnj, simple questions about the e-mails antigop Sep 2015 #63

I think we know the answers to 1 and 2 karynnj Sep 2015 #65

It gets worse. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #20

If I understand that correctly she's in deep shit. elehhhhna Sep 2015 #28

Yes. Odd that her emails with Petraeus were during this period. nt Lychee2 Sep 2015 #32

Why see it as odd when it is KNOWN that Petraeus was in charge of Benghazi blm Sep 2015 #72

I meant "odd" that she didn't give them to the committee. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #75

It was a covert CIA op - withheld info would be a CIA call. blm Sep 2015 #78

Ooops ! left-of-center2012 Sep 2015 #21

This message was self-deleted by its author TrollBuster9090 Sep 2015 #23

Shows she was coordinating Libya w/Petraeus from Day 1 leveymg Sep 2015 #30

Its appearing more and more like Hillary was running a second state department/private CIA. Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 #33

Yes, and possibly doing a little business at the same time. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #36

Exactly. leveymg Sep 2015 #42

Nothing Here videohead5 Sep 2015 #35

"Good morning," she lied. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #39

Good Morning videohead5 Sep 2015 #45

Your post is incomprehensible. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #54

Who's bringing forth the Petraeus emails? Someone in the WH, or someone in TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #40

This is a weekly cut of a thousand knives. Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 #43

Nobody in the administration is going to risk being accused of not cooperating Babel_17 Sep 2015 #48

They came from the Defense Department. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #55

"other work emails from later in her tenure were also missing" antigop Sep 2015 #64

"Good news everyone!" Babel_17 Sep 2015 #47

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi JoePhilly Sep 2015 #52

Benghazi!!! is the GOP version that obscures the real scandal, which is failed serial regime change leveymg Sep 2015 #59

I think the Hillary campaign would like to talk about Benghazi Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 #62

Plus a million. nt. polly7 Sep 2015 #68

They're inseparable, as hard as some may try. leveymg Sep 2015 #76

Burn the witch!!!! n/t librechik Sep 2015 #58

It's called self immolation... Jesus Malverde Sep 2015 #61

I'll sure be glad when this witch hunt is over madokie Sep 2015 #66

it is looking more and more restorefreedom Sep 2015 #67

Obama's goal was to reach out ... moonscape Sep 2015 #69

he must have nerves of steel restorefreedom Sep 2015 #70