Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I suspected as much - LiberalElite Oct 2015 #1
Great minds..... Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #3
Yeah, I thought this stunk to high heaven. pamela Oct 2015 #7
Yes, exactly. MH1 Oct 2015 #109
And? Beowulf42 Oct 2015 #32
And there are a lot of Catholic Scalias? n/t mhatrw Oct 2015 #65
That's what I thought as well. I felt the Pope was probably not fully informed. n/t Tess49 Oct 2015 #41
That means the "journalist" who asked the question was in on it. yardwork Oct 2015 #85
As I suspected the Pope was not keeping close tabs on the Davis story as the American media Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #2
and - LiberalElite Oct 2015 #10
Extensive coverage on the Beeb and in the Italian media. nt msanthrope Oct 2015 #57
You are talking about a head of state melm00se Oct 2015 #77
Link? Or hope? Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #81
Well, we've been back and forth on this. longship Oct 2015 #4
Maybe. Or maybe DavidDvorkin Oct 2015 #5
If so Flying Squirrel Oct 2015 #34
I read an earlier story that attributed it to a set up Warpy Oct 2015 #6
Frankly, this is probably the most plausible. Francis has a mission, and it is not necessarily to.. Raster Oct 2015 #16
Joseph E Kurtz, the Archbishop of Louisville rpannier Oct 2015 #22
So was Al Capone. HubertHeaver Oct 2015 #37
And most other criminals rpannier Oct 2015 #47
I've now done a bit more reading.... Raster Oct 2015 #94
To Forgive Is Divine SCVDem Oct 2015 #8
So, the Pope gets punked. PatrickforO Oct 2015 #9
Welcome to American politics. Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #11
Nah, this kind of thing has been going on in the Vatican for about 2000 years. (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #92
Do you really think that the Vatican is not savvy enough to know Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #97
You're assuming the vatican knew. jeff47 Oct 2015 #98
Would love to see that connection made. Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #101
It seems out of character for him to seek out this woman. TwilightGardener Oct 2015 #12
This pope said gay marriage is the work of the devil Major Nikon Oct 2015 #17
Read the link I posted below and tell me he does not seek out fundie right wingers pro actively. Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #18
Honestly Mira Oct 2015 #13
So how do they explain the whole shindig they held in November with that whole fundie crowd? Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #14
The pope is old, tired, ill-advised, too busy a schedule, given the wrong script, blah blah blah progree Oct 2015 #27
Not one of his defenders can manage to comment on that Time piece or others about that conference. Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #76
I'll be happy to comment on your latest tack. Darb Oct 2015 #84
Your post was entirely devoid of comment on the article at the link. You preached a long and Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #103
Yeah I'm not buying the poor old pope was hoodwinked workinclasszero Oct 2015 #72
Lots of people high up in Catholic hierarchy are total bigots. yardwork Oct 2015 #88
Franky still showed that deep down he is a bigot Submariner Oct 2015 #15
And there it is....why some folks at DU so very much wanted to believe the Pope was not deceived Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #82
Actually, I don't think it shows that one way or the other. yardwork Oct 2015 #86
Here's the Reuters account from 2 days ago of what he said on the plane after the meeting progree Oct 2015 #19
Two thoughts Kelvin Mace Oct 2015 #21
His statement didn't connect conscientious objection to gay marriage specifically. pnwmom Oct 2015 #25
"That statement came in response to a reporter's question on the papal plane about Kim Davis" progree Oct 2015 #28
No, the reporter's question did NOT name Kim Davis specifically. pnwmom Oct 2015 #29
He didn't say he was unfamiliar with all C.O. incidents, and he had met with Kim Davis progree Oct 2015 #35
He hadn't "just met with a government worker who is a conscientious objector." pnwmom Oct 2015 #36
Well, less than a week ago. Yes, I know he is old and overworked blah blah progree Oct 2015 #38
His schedule would be grueling for ANYONE, and he met many, many people while he was here. pnwmom Oct 2015 #40
Yes, he's overworked and poorly briefed (sigh, here we go again) progree Oct 2015 #44
What I said was, that the reporter on the PLANE didn't mention her name in his question. pnwmom Oct 2015 #50
Whose reporters were on the plane? I didn't get that from either story progree Oct 2015 #58
Would you continue to insist on your Reuters version even if you read the actual text pnwmom Oct 2015 #61
No, the Reuters reporter did not imply but stated it was a question about Kim Davis progree Oct 2015 #64
We don't have dueling accounts. I provided you with a verbatim text pnwmom Oct 2015 #78
See my #66 - I was responding to your verbatim text in your #61 progree Oct 2015 #93
Wow, that was a very interesting transcript. Thanks! progree Oct 2015 #66
On thinking about this some more progree Oct 2015 #68
We agree on at least one thing, I think. pnwmom Oct 2015 #79
Yup. But the Pope sure seems to agree that a govt worker has a right to deny gays marriage licenses progree Oct 2015 #95
While it is correct that the government worker has a human right to object, HubertHeaver Oct 2015 #48
I agree. And I think he would, too, under these circumstances. But his comments pnwmom Oct 2015 #51
Didn't Pope Francis just undermine the authority of the Catholic Church? More questions Oct 2015 #49
Well, I'm sure that's what the rightwing of the Church thinks. pnwmom Oct 2015 #52
The point of conscientious objection is in lack of choice. colorado_ufo Oct 2015 #106
Vatican ventriloquists. Warren Stupidity Oct 2015 #100
These are Pentecostals. Scary if you ask me. They believe in speaking in 'tongue' (whatever). YOHABLO Oct 2015 #20
They're not even close to FLDS. Do you have nay idea what you're saying? They also aren't baby trillion Oct 2015 #42
Interestingly, now we learn that Kim Davus was raised Catholic. yardwork Oct 2015 #89
No shit. nt onehandle Oct 2015 #23
Can Kim Davis disappear, please? NealK Oct 2015 #24
No, this is good stuff. Flying Squirrel Oct 2015 #33
I'm disappointed by that guy. NealK Oct 2015 #60
I have to agree. I can't stand her, or donald trumps face. I'm disgusted that RollingStone put trump trillion Oct 2015 #45
Many conservative cardinals/bishops oppose Francis' reforms & teachings. Divernan Oct 2015 #26
You got it. There's a group of right-wingers trying to undermine him at every turn. pnwmom Oct 2015 #31
Human rights are not an issue of 'sexual morality' based on YOUR morality. They are rights held by Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #75
here is a fix to the above link mrdmk Oct 2015 #62
Thank you. Divernan Oct 2015 #71
for her its all about money elmac Oct 2015 #30
You'll never convince me bvf Oct 2015 #39
I choose to believe the Pope.. the_sly_pig Oct 2015 #43
I've said it before and I'll say it again awoke_in_2003 Oct 2015 #46
+10000000 CharlotteVale Oct 2015 #53
Strong words Liberal_in_LA Oct 2015 #56
I have to say, I thought it was a bone-headed, tone-deaf end to what was a pretty deft PR trip. MADem Oct 2015 #54
I do not agree with the Pope on LGBT issues, BUT that said, I believe he was blindsided nadine_mn Oct 2015 #55
I agree and here is why Marrah_G Oct 2015 #63
BULLSHIT--His security, including our Secret Service, would have had to pre-approve her. nt msanthrope Oct 2015 #59
But security clearance has nothing to do with political optics. yardwork Oct 2015 #87
Do you have unrestricted access to the most intimate happening within the Catholic Church? olegramps Oct 2015 #90
Pope's visit with Davis: A fish on a bicycle. colorado_ufo Oct 2015 #67
Read this article, then tell me how surprising it is that the Pope meets evangelicals...From Nov Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #74
Outreach effort. Many evangelicals (particularly fundamentalists) are anti-Catholic. MH1 Oct 2015 #110
BS Alert, BS Alert he is a Head of State and the Fricking Pope unless the meeting happened on a YabaDabaNoDinoNo Oct 2015 #69
But the Chicago archbishop in that same article says the pope did do it on purpose muriel_volestrangler Oct 2015 #70
A NAMED Vatican spokesman says Popes meeting with GAY Argentinian couple was his only REAL meeting lostnfound Oct 2015 #111
Sure, they've now decided the PR line they need to take muriel_volestrangler Oct 2015 #112
Tony Perkins Will Join Anti-Gay Leaders At Vatican Marriage Meeting- Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #73
This I can believe mcar Oct 2015 #80
If that's true, why did they keep it a secret until the pope was out WestSeattle2 Oct 2015 #83
To speculate: olegramps Oct 2015 #91
I actually believe this. We know that here in the US the jwirr Oct 2015 #96
Uber conservative Opus Dei Catholics can't stand this Pope Loki Oct 2015 #99
utter bullcrap taught_me_patience Oct 2015 #102
The fact that none of you can read the facts and answer for them should convict your hearts. Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #104
Bad Internet. pamela Oct 2015 #108
Sounds like the Pope is trying to have his cake and eat it too Blasphemer Oct 2015 #105
So the fascist "Christians" blindsided and exploited the Pope. Elmer S. E. Dump Oct 2015 #107
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Vatican Source: Pope Blin...»Reply #56