Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Vatican Source: Pope Blindsided By Meeting With Controversial Kentucky Clerk [View all]Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)56. Strong words
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Vatican Source: Pope Blindsided By Meeting With Controversial Kentucky Clerk [View all]
pamela
Oct 2015
OP
That's what I thought as well. I felt the Pope was probably not fully informed. n/t
Tess49
Oct 2015
#41
As I suspected the Pope was not keeping close tabs on the Davis story as the American media
Fred Sanders
Oct 2015
#2
Frankly, this is probably the most plausible. Francis has a mission, and it is not necessarily to..
Raster
Oct 2015
#16
Nah, this kind of thing has been going on in the Vatican for about 2000 years. (nt)
jeff47
Oct 2015
#92
Read the link I posted below and tell me he does not seek out fundie right wingers pro actively.
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2015
#18
So how do they explain the whole shindig they held in November with that whole fundie crowd?
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2015
#14
The pope is old, tired, ill-advised, too busy a schedule, given the wrong script, blah blah blah
progree
Oct 2015
#27
Not one of his defenders can manage to comment on that Time piece or others about that conference.
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2015
#76
Your post was entirely devoid of comment on the article at the link. You preached a long and
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2015
#103
And there it is....why some folks at DU so very much wanted to believe the Pope was not deceived
Fred Sanders
Oct 2015
#82
Here's the Reuters account from 2 days ago of what he said on the plane after the meeting
progree
Oct 2015
#19
His statement didn't connect conscientious objection to gay marriage specifically.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#25
"That statement came in response to a reporter's question on the papal plane about Kim Davis"
progree
Oct 2015
#28
He didn't say he was unfamiliar with all C.O. incidents, and he had met with Kim Davis
progree
Oct 2015
#35
His schedule would be grueling for ANYONE, and he met many, many people while he was here.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#40
What I said was, that the reporter on the PLANE didn't mention her name in his question.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#50
Would you continue to insist on your Reuters version even if you read the actual text
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#61
No, the Reuters reporter did not imply but stated it was a question about Kim Davis
progree
Oct 2015
#64
Yup. But the Pope sure seems to agree that a govt worker has a right to deny gays marriage licenses
progree
Oct 2015
#95
While it is correct that the government worker has a human right to object,
HubertHeaver
Oct 2015
#48
Didn't Pope Francis just undermine the authority of the Catholic Church?
More questions
Oct 2015
#49
These are Pentecostals. Scary if you ask me. They believe in speaking in 'tongue' (whatever).
YOHABLO
Oct 2015
#20
They're not even close to FLDS. Do you have nay idea what you're saying? They also aren't baby
trillion
Oct 2015
#42
I have to agree. I can't stand her, or donald trumps face. I'm disgusted that RollingStone put trump
trillion
Oct 2015
#45
You got it. There's a group of right-wingers trying to undermine him at every turn.
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#31
Human rights are not an issue of 'sexual morality' based on YOUR morality. They are rights held by
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2015
#75
I have to say, I thought it was a bone-headed, tone-deaf end to what was a pretty deft PR trip.
MADem
Oct 2015
#54
I do not agree with the Pope on LGBT issues, BUT that said, I believe he was blindsided
nadine_mn
Oct 2015
#55
BULLSHIT--His security, including our Secret Service, would have had to pre-approve her. nt
msanthrope
Oct 2015
#59
Do you have unrestricted access to the most intimate happening within the Catholic Church?
olegramps
Oct 2015
#90
Read this article, then tell me how surprising it is that the Pope meets evangelicals...From Nov
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2015
#74
Outreach effort. Many evangelicals (particularly fundamentalists) are anti-Catholic.
MH1
Oct 2015
#110
BS Alert, BS Alert he is a Head of State and the Fricking Pope unless the meeting happened on a
YabaDabaNoDinoNo
Oct 2015
#69
But the Chicago archbishop in that same article says the pope did do it on purpose
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2015
#70
A NAMED Vatican spokesman says Popes meeting with GAY Argentinian couple was his only REAL meeting
lostnfound
Oct 2015
#111
The fact that none of you can read the facts and answer for them should convict your hearts.
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2015
#104