Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
25. The establishment of an international arbitration court in which a corporation can bring a claim
Sun Oct 4, 2015, 11:45 PM
Oct 2015

against a country, pick one of three judges and enforce a judgment against a defendant nation means that court can overrule and render null and void an Act of Congress, of your state legislature or on ordinance passed by your city council.

We have been ordered to prohibit identifying the country of origin of meat sold in our country already.

The TPP is a way to establish an authoritarian government by arbitration court that will be able to overrule many of our local laws, laws we want but that corporations object to.

That is just one aspect of the TPP that I am pretty sure will be in it. (That kind of court was established by NAFTA.) We now also have to allow Mexican trucks and drivers on our roads at least in California whether our state wants to allow them or not. Nothing against Mexicans but why should we be required to allow their trucks to drive loads on our roads when Americans could be doing that work. I do not know whether the Mexican-owned trucks have to meet our standards in terms of emissions and safety.

We are slowly being deprived of a lot of the right to self-government that we originally fought for. We need to stop these trade agreements now. We can still trade.

The agreements protect the interests of corporations, not the interests of ordinary people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't believe there are any "principles" involved. n/t djean111 Oct 2015 #1
Well, there is one.... daleanime Oct 2015 #27
LOL, yep absolutely right on. PatrickforO Oct 2015 #32
Hillary will be pleased. cpompilo Oct 2015 #2
She's very happy it has wrapped up before the first debate. jalan48 Oct 2015 #11
And particularly before her coronation. cpompilo Oct 2015 #14
I'm not so sure. Her ability to triangulate and evade will go down. Jim Lane Oct 2015 #33
Agreed. An agreement that is "under negotiation" is easier to ignore than a finished one that pampango Oct 2015 #37
Good point. I guess it comes down to whether or not she can drag her feet until elected. jalan48 Oct 2015 #43
Life for the poor just became substantially more difficult, unless NCjack Oct 2015 #3
My criteria for DEM is simple - vote for it, or shill for it - not a DEM. djean111 Oct 2015 #5
well said. nt restorefreedom Oct 2015 #10
Senate Dems can't kill it. jeff47 Oct 2015 #17
+1 NealK Oct 2015 #19
The 1% can't be satiated. /nt NCjack Oct 2015 #23
Yeah, but let's all make them PAY by losing their next election. PatrickforO Oct 2015 #34
Losing their next PRIMARY election - yes. The idea of a 60-republican senate would be a large price pampango Oct 2015 #39
Yeah, those Republicans might do something like pass the TPP. (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #40
I think the damage to the country that a 60-republican senate could do goes well beyond that. pampango Oct 2015 #41
Yeah, they might pass a health plan from the heritage foundation. jeff47 Oct 2015 #42
That was based on bill passed by a liberal Democratic Massachusetts legislature, vetoed by Romney pampango Oct 2015 #44
Yet that still doesn't change where the plan came from jeff47 Oct 2015 #45
Certainly does not change the origin only the destination. pampango Oct 2015 #46
No, it delays the destination with a band-aid fix on a horrific system jeff47 Oct 2015 #47
The Transformation of nationalize the fed Oct 2015 #4
And then they wonder why thousands are coming out to support Bernie, who describes JDPriestly Oct 2015 #6
When they finally release it I think you have a good plan. jwirr Oct 2015 #13
I'd like to better understand TPP and what it means, moonscape Oct 2015 #21
The establishment of an international arbitration court in which a corporation can bring a claim JDPriestly Oct 2015 #25
Dumbing it down will be tough because it's so long and complex Jim Lane Oct 2015 #26
I'm hoping this is a bluff Demeter Oct 2015 #7
It actually is reputable. tomg2 Oct 2015 #16
"Deal" as in "screwing over the masses." CharlotteVale Oct 2015 #8
This would be a major defeat for ordinary Earthlings jfern Oct 2015 #9
best most concise analysis rurallib Oct 2015 #12
I thought I heard a sucking sound madville Oct 2015 #15
+1 CONN Oct 2015 #18
We are so screwed. NealK Oct 2015 #20
This will help the president's legacy. The people who own all of the media will get rich Doctor_J Oct 2015 #22
Obummer PSPS Oct 2015 #24
Principle--------------yeah right, more like sell out............................... turbinetree Oct 2015 #28
What next. The TPP solidifies globalism over local sovereignty. It might trigger Bernie wins. ancianita Oct 2015 #29
And there are these people to vote against as their terms end. God, I hate the frustration of ancianita Oct 2015 #30
Also, remember Pelosi is a master of manipulating things so that some Dems can djean111 Oct 2015 #36
Man, how many decades did we swallow that crap of corporatism presented as bi-partisanship. ancianita Oct 2015 #38
Ironic, considering their 'deal in principle' is a deal without principle for the 99% PatrickforO Oct 2015 #31
Not the October surprise I was hoping for.... blackspade Oct 2015 #35
The "main sticking point" was how to protect private corporations from the customers and hughee99 Oct 2015 #48
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»TPP negotiators to announ...»Reply #25