Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(16,974 posts)

5. they did not have any facts on there side

Mon Oct 12, 2015, 11:28 AM

Oct 2015

when the CDC did the latest research on defensive gun use, it did not support the controllers claims. I do not think that should be limited.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Basic Gun Violence Research Is Seriously Underfunded [View all] frizzled Oct 2015 OP

I do not think they should adocate Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #2

they did not have any facts on there side Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #5

The one Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #19

What are they supposed to do with the research? flamin lib Oct 2015 #7

That is for other organizations to take the plain data and do Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #8

I reiterate the previous response . . . flamin lib Oct 2015 #9

I know, you have nothing Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #11

Gotta have the last word even if it is to double down on, flamin lib Oct 2015 #12

That language prevents peer reviewed research Gormy Cuss Oct 2015 #14

Coming to reasonable conclusions based on data is not "advocating." SunSeeker Oct 2015 #20

I do agree there are very underfunded Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #6

Yup. Sad isn't it? SunSeeker Oct 2015 #15

K&R! stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #16

why does it happen that way? mikepete Oct 2015 #22

frizzled.....we have to lock your post GP6971 Oct 2015 #23