Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
39. Different indeed. They're usually based on individual players' performances
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 08:44 PM
Oct 2015

I don't know exactly how DraftKings works but I think it's similar to the season-long fantasy football leagues except that, with DraftKings, your team roster can change completely from week to week. Either way, you prepare a lineup for your "team" -- it's not really a team, that's why this is fantasy, your lineup might include players from several different teams as long as they're all on your fantasy roster. You might have, for example, a quarterback, a wide receiver, a tight end, and a running back, who in real life play for four different teams playing this Sunday in four different cities (or two of them might even be on opposing real-life teams). Real fantasy leagues generally consider more than four positions but I don't want to type them all out. The fantasy league has a formula for converting each player's individual performance into points on a common scale. A wide receiver's total for the day might be multiplier A times the number of yards on receptions plus multiplier B times the number of touchdowns minus multiplier C times the number of fumbles. In any given week, your team's performance is based on adding up the points for all the players that were in your lineup that week.

In the example you give, the question about Team A's touchdowns would be how they were scored. If all were rushing touchdowns by a particular running back, then the points go to whichever fantasy team had that running back in its lineup that week. If Team A used two different running backs, the total of five touchdowns would be irrelevant for fantasy purposes; what would count would be which player scored each one. Credit for the five touchdowns might be divided between two different fantasy teams.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's definitely gambling oberliner Oct 2015 #1
I hope the whole racket gets shut down. Kingofalldems Oct 2015 #2
Even if that gets shut down, fantasy football is going anywhere Travis_0004 Oct 2015 #11
You hate when people are having fun. former9thward Oct 2015 #20
From the guy who is certain O'Reilly lives in NYC. Kingofalldems Oct 2015 #24
Hey King keep your stalking threads straight. former9thward Oct 2015 #38
No difference really. Kingofalldems Oct 2015 #40
When I reply to posts it is because of the post. former9thward Oct 2015 #41
Are you saying I look you up? Kingofalldems Oct 2015 #42
If you find a topic or poster disagreeable former9thward Oct 2015 #44
Call it like I see it-don't like it? TS. Kingofalldems Oct 2015 #45
Agreed oberliner Oct 2015 #26
+1000 Blue_Tires Oct 2015 #35
What exactly is the progressive argument Codeine Oct 2015 #3
It's a gateway... jberryhill Oct 2015 #5
DUzy. nt awoke_in_2003 Oct 2015 #14
Another poster who hate people having fun. former9thward Oct 2015 #21
Present company excepted jberryhill Oct 2015 #29
It's about admitting it, and regulating the industry. bluedigger Oct 2015 #8
About time! Botany Oct 2015 #4
I'm not clear on how these things work, but... jberryhill Oct 2015 #6
These short-term fantasy bets would be a bad way to play that hunch. Jim Lane Oct 2015 #17
Sounds like a different idea on "winning" KatyMan Oct 2015 #37
Different indeed. They're usually based on individual players' performances Jim Lane Oct 2015 #39
Don't fall for it. The bookies and mob and state regulators aren't getting a take = "Shut it down!" Baclava Oct 2015 #7
You think it's healthy for a 2.5 Billion dollar industry to be unregulated? bluedigger Oct 2015 #9
"Wah - we wish we would have thought of this!" ... Shut down all the state lotteries too. Baclava Oct 2015 #10
Or the more traditional palms were greased to avoid oversight. bluedigger Oct 2015 #12
It's not 'Sports Gambling'... Baclava Oct 2015 #15
You're missing the point. bluedigger Oct 2015 #16
They are pulling out of Nevada. The corporations want their monopoly on Vegas gambling Baclava Oct 2015 #22
Well, it IS sports gambling, even if the sports are getting a piece of the action! rocktivity Oct 2015 #13
Some sports are SwankyXomb Oct 2015 #32
makes pete rose look clean dembotoz Oct 2015 #18
Yes! Because time and again, prohibition has been so successful... FrodosPet Oct 2015 #25
Regulation has oberliner Oct 2015 #27
Prohibitions against driving against traffic on a one-way street is simply restraining the freedom LanternWaste Oct 2015 #34
Traffic laws are there to protect people's physical safety. christx30 Oct 2015 #43
Here's how you know it's gambling svpadgham Oct 2015 #19
Maybe Not The Best Example ProfessorGAC Oct 2015 #23
It is clearly gambling oberliner Oct 2015 #28
Gambling or not is a grey area whatthehey Oct 2015 #30
Nevada and New Jersey seem to be taking the lead Z_California Oct 2015 #31
Nevada casinos hate anything that eats into their profits. oasis Oct 2015 #33
As with prostitution or medicinal marijuana, I personally have no problem with gambling closeupready Oct 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Daily fantasy sports site...»Reply #39