Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Chicago police: 3-year-old fatally shot by brother, 6 [View all]GGJohn
(9,951 posts)27. You didn't answer my question.
You said you support confiscation of all guns, I asked what's your plan for accomplishing that.
Buy back programs are perfectly legal as long as it's voluntary, not forced like what happened in Australia.
I would be ok with licensing of firearm owners, much like IL's FOID card, registration is a no go with me, the govt has no right nor business knowing what firearms I own.
Liability insurance? For what purpose? Insurance companies won't pay for the criminal use of a firearm.
I have no problem with reporting it lost or stolen, honest firearm owners do that now, my problem is holding the owner responsible for the criminal use of a lost or stolen firearm even if the owner didn't report it.
or your kid finds it and kills his little brother, or sister, or mom while out shopping, you lose all rights to own a gun forever. And if you're caught with one after that, you serve serious jail time
No problem with that.
I just sincerely wish that all of the gun apologists would get to have someone they love killed by a gun. You're the ones who don't seem to mind, so take it on.
That's fucking sick, wishing for the deaths of relatives of firearms owners who defend their right to own a firearm.
I won't alert on it, but some one will so you should delete that garbage.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The kid was probably standing his ground.......fucking gun nuts. GUNS ARE NOT FOR DEFENSE!!!
bowens43
Oct 2015
#4
But, but, but then you couldn't get to your gun fast enough to shoot a home invader! nt
Fla Dem
Oct 2015
#8
At night there are several different options...just pick the one that's right for you.
ileus
Oct 2015
#30
The NRA Morons who think everyone should be armed publically should pay attention
patsimp
Oct 2015
#7
The only thing that stop a bad six year old with a gun is a good three year old with a gun.
iandhr
Oct 2015
#9
Ninety days to turn 'em in. You possess one after that, you're publicly hanged.
lastlib
Oct 2015
#36
No, I don't like my plan, either. But I'm still waiting for one from your side......
lastlib
Oct 2015
#70
Because kids don't explore. don't climb on counters, don't pick up anything they find.
Gormy Cuss
Oct 2015
#86
Praise Jeebus the child's right to a firearm was not impinged, even at the expense
valerief
Oct 2015
#14
At least this time the negligent adult is being charged. Usually the cops just call
tblue37
Oct 2015
#15