Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 10:07 AM Oct 2015

Iran Has Always Clandestinely Sought the Bomb, Admits Ex-president [View all]

Source: Haaretz

Rafsanjani, who is head of Iran’s State Exigency Council, explained that Iran's goal was deterrence in light of its extended war with Iraq.


"Those years, we were all thinking that we should arm ourselves with deterrent elements since the war was not about to end and in our defensive policies we had the word of Imam [Khomeini] in mind that the war may last 20 years,” said

According to the IRNA interview as reported by NCRI, Rafsanjani and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei have personally followed up on the project to acquire a nuclear bomb. He also acknowledged the clandestine nature of the nuclear program, which has included building secret sites, enriching uranium, manufacturing centrifuge parts, employing laser technology and constructing a heavy water reactor.

“80% to 90% of the Iranian people… concur with the [nuclear] accord and want to be done with it [nuclear project],” stated Rafsanjani. The National Council pointed out that this statement contradicts the Islamic regime's official position that the Iranian people have been fully behind the project.


Read more: http://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/1.682812



The level of candor is more surprising than the subject matter of the admission.

I'm sure some will, ironically, try to spin this as proof that the Iran nuclear deal was a bad idea, when in reality it's exactly the opposite.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Agree completely -- and this admission is also in keeping with the karynnj Oct 2015 #1
"I'm sure some will, ironically, try to spin this..." uawchild Oct 2015 #2
43% would gladly vote for Ben Carson if he's their nominee. geek tragedy Oct 2015 #3
Nukes deter war. They'd be insane NOT to get a bomb. frizzled Oct 2015 #4
After the US invaded 2 bombless countries but left North Korea alone. hollowdweller Oct 2015 #6
I always said to pro-Iraq war types, "If they had WMD, why would we invade"? frizzled Oct 2015 #7
Then we talked Khaddaffy into giving up the bomb, then killed him AngryAmish Oct 2015 #16
He was killed by his own people, EX500rider Oct 2015 #17
NATO played a prominent role in the civil war daleo Oct 2015 #21
Yeah, we only bombed his convoy Yupster Oct 2015 #22
The problem is, Iran isn't fully rational. Oneironaut Oct 2015 #14
You have no evidence for that cpwm17 Oct 2015 #15
Do you trust fundamentalists who said that their sky fairy wants you dead? Oneironaut Oct 2015 #18
Iran doesn't have much of of history of being particularly violent. cpwm17 Oct 2015 #19
And their country is a theocracy that frequently murders its own people, Oneironaut Oct 2015 #20
Refreshing candor. nt bemildred Oct 2015 #5
one could argue that the Iran nuclear deal is already providing benefits geek tragedy Oct 2015 #8
They seem to intend to comply. bemildred Oct 2015 #9
rejecting the Iran deal would have led to a retrenchment of the status quo geek tragedy Oct 2015 #10
I think Iran will not get too big for its britches. bemildred Oct 2015 #11
The period after the Iran-Iraq War isn't "always." Even 20 years ended in 2007 leveymg Oct 2015 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #13
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran Has Always Clandesti...