Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Occupy protester 'banned' from flight home for Christmas [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)49. WaPo Report With Statement From Airport....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/occupy-london-protester-detained-at-airport-for-distributing-leaflets-misses-flight-home-for-christmas/2011/12/29/gIQAEkiROP_blog.html
Bristol International Airport spokeswoman Jaqui Mills confirms that Culatto was detained in part because of the leaflets he carried:
The passenger was observed behaving in an unusual way and was carrying a quantity of photocopied leaflets. Security staff were concerned that he may cause disruption by distributing the leaflets on the flight or in the departure lounge. Having agreed to travel without the photocopied leaflets in his hand luggage the passenger was allowed to proceed to the boarding gate. Unfortunately, by this point the flight had closed.
Culatto says the posters in his bag were related to the anarchist collective Crimethinc. He also said police at the airport told him they had seem him acting suspiciously on the airports CCTV system while he stopped and spoke to other travelers.
Mills notes that the restriction on leaflets being distributed in the airport terminal applies regardless of the content and that any leafleting at the airport requires prior permission.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is what happens when you let ANY government have unchecked power to wage endless war
ixion
Dec 2011
#4
Well, gee, there was a dem majority in congress when the unPATRIOTic Act was passed.
ixion
Dec 2011
#7
I disagree. We don't have the kind of democracy that allows us to vote that way.
gtar100
Dec 2011
#24
I agree in principle but it's not how it works. Two parties - that's all that's being served,
gtar100
Dec 2011
#31
'Real change is from the ground up,' is correct. The GOP has done this state after state until they
freshwest
Dec 2011
#40
My premise is that BOTH parties have contributed to the implementation of the Corporate Police State
ixion
Dec 2011
#36
Barely. It wasn't until the middle of 2001 (May) that the Democrats had the majority in the Senate
Tiggeroshii
Dec 2011
#74
The good thing is that OCCUPY is growing. The concept, the idea, it will not die until things
Sarah Ibarruri
Dec 2011
#2
Yep, "Bill of rights???" What's that, a receipt from a store or something??? n/t
RKP5637
Dec 2011
#16
I am proud of my little town of Port Orford on the southern Oregon coast.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
Dec 2011
#19
...Mr Culatto said: "(I was told) that because of the very remote possibility
rocktivity
Dec 2011
#54
Why not boycott the airlines. Buy tickets on only those airlines that allow you on board.
Islandlife
Dec 2011
#67