Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
3. As Mitt put it, 47% don't pay income tax
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 07:55 AM
Nov 2015

So how does this help them? I would suspect that the only folks who would be able to take advantage of this in full would be a narrow band making 80-100K/yr. It would be interesting to see an analysis of exactly how many people could actually take advantage of this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is going to be a major issue and I'm glad she's put it on her agenda. William769 Nov 2015 #1
Too little, too late. Major Hogwash Nov 2015 #2
As Mitt put it, 47% don't pay income tax n2doc Nov 2015 #3
You can receive tax credits as refunds even if you don't pay income tax Rose Siding Nov 2015 #11
Depends on how the tax credit is structured. n2doc Nov 2015 #22
THANK YOU Jongsun, Brian & Sandrea for canvassing for @HillaryClinton in riversedge Nov 2015 #4
What does this have to do with the OP? pipoman Nov 2015 #14
The point is that Hillary has lots of folks out doing the needed foot to make sure she is elected riversedge Nov 2015 #21
Single-payer for all be a big help. /nt NCjack Nov 2015 #5
Indeed /nt think Nov 2015 #9
+1,000,000 Auggie Nov 2015 #18
Hillary is trying to distract from her Wall st donors and *911 made me do it* Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #6
Can she offer any tax breaks houston16revival Nov 2015 #7
$1,200 per year would have made it much less burdensome, eh? pipoman Nov 2015 #15
1200 dollars. 50-70k minimum annual expenses for long term care. Warren Stupidity Nov 2015 #8
Her plan is for care in the home by relatives most likely. It will help. Now there is nothing riversedge Nov 2015 #28
1200 dollars. How does that actually help? Warren Stupidity Nov 2015 #30
Up to $1200. For costs that routinely run tens of thousands a year. AllyCat Nov 2015 #10
$1200 ain't nothing but a bribe. 2pooped2pop Nov 2015 #12
$6k won't pay for a single month in a residential facility pipoman Nov 2015 #13
We have needed to do something about the poor pay and lack of benefits for home health care workers. CBHagman Nov 2015 #16
So lets see what she is proposing. Promethean Nov 2015 #17
My opinion: Just a good line of political baloney. Paper Roses Nov 2015 #19
Providing care for an elderly or sick loved one should not mean sacrificing your own secure retireme riversedge Nov 2015 #20
front burner very low flame azurnoir Nov 2015 #23
Does Sander's plan even have a flame? Is the pilot lite on? riversedge Nov 2015 #25
Sanders has not attempted to separate home care from medical coverage azurnoir Nov 2015 #26
Does he Medicare for All "plan" cover home careGIVERS? to the degree Hillary's does?? riversedge Nov 2015 #27
$1200 per year? To that extent? Warren Stupidity Nov 2015 #31
Clinton’s Plan to Invest in the Caring Economy: Recognizing the Value of Family Caregivers and Home riversedge Nov 2015 #24
A very tiny drop in a gigantic bucket. CharlotteVale Nov 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton Puts Fami...»Reply #3