Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moriah

(8,312 posts)
6. If people would read the full story on this...
Thu Dec 29, 2011, 10:24 PM
Dec 2011

... the issue was that the AHS is unable, by law, to treat or hold any animal if they have not received payment or if surrender paperwork is not filled out.

They are also required by law to treat animals that were taken by the police on animal abuse charges and hold them for 17 days.

The day Scruffy was surrendered, 186 other animals were surrendered, including several that the law mandated they treat. Three animals needed surgery that day, they could only take care of two of them. Those two were most likely the ones taken by police and they had no other choice but to treat them first.

If it would have been humane to let the animal suffer overnight, he could have declined to surrender her and keep her at home until his mom could wire him the money. Obviously he felt her pain was too much to do that. So he gave her the best chance he could.

The AHS's hands were tied and the only thing they could have done differently was accept payment by phone.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The AHS Campus for Compassion..... Curmudgeoness Dec 2011 #1
What's especially infuriating is that, after refusing liberalhistorian Dec 2011 #14
Read my longer post about this, I edited my original n/t. moriah Dec 2011 #18
Pilanthropic orginizations are forced to act cold.. orpupilofnature57 Dec 2011 #2
in memoriam Enrique Dec 2011 #4
I'm angry, sick and horrified by this...and appalled at the stupidity! Moonwalk Dec 2011 #3
If people would read the full story on this... moriah Dec 2011 #6
Read the next paragraph, Sen. Walter Sobchak Dec 2011 #7
Surrender is the LAST and FINAL option, and he signed the paperwork. moriah Dec 2011 #8
How many ways is one to interpret the following phrase? Sen. Walter Sobchak Dec 2011 #9
He could have declined to surrender the cat and instead taken it home with him. moriah Dec 2011 #10
One more time, as has been previously pointed out, liberalhistorian Dec 2011 #13
Again. You are misconstruing the timeline. Read the original article. Please. Thank you. moriah Dec 2011 #17
"clinic staff could not return the cat to Dockery without treatment," Sen. Walter Sobchak Dec 2011 #15
Read the original article. You are misconstruing the timeline. moriah Dec 2011 #16
BTW, when I say he could have declined to surrender, I'm going by the original article on the case: moriah Dec 2011 #12
I like the image of a 49-year-old recovering heroin addict Enrique Dec 2011 #5
Speechless. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2011 #11
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ariz. Humane Society chan...»Reply #6