Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Go Vols

(5,902 posts)
13. results
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 02:04 AM
Dec 2015

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
On Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:55 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

To listen to the ammosexuals a huge majority of the public supports them.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1280474

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Ammosexual, really... this is the kind of insult that does not belong in a discussion forum

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:01 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh get over it.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Finally,this sex and guns shit is quite bizarre.What part of the gun am I to hump, as it wont fit in the barrel.

Grease up the stock?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Good for the NYT. Every newspaper in America needs to follow suit. LonePirate Dec 2015 #1
Thanks. Rachel just discussed this. elleng Dec 2015 #2
Hopefully we finally reached our tipping point. cui bono Dec 2015 #3
wow gristy Dec 2015 #4
Gun Enthusiasts houston16revival Dec 2015 #5
To listen to the ammosexuals a huge majority of the public supports them. Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #6
Depends entirely on the question. jeff47 Dec 2015 #8
I'm for taking them away from guys who get a woody talking about them.... Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #9
results Go Vols Dec 2015 #13
LOL!!! Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #14
Time for Democratic Underground to get off Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #7
A masterpiece of persuasive writing Politicub Dec 2015 #10
I would have gone further than they did frazzled Dec 2015 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #16
Virtually every thing you mentioned is asked and answered SCOTUS case law pipoman Dec 2015 #17
You're dead wrong frazzled Dec 2015 #20
No, the ban was making it's way to SCOTUS pipoman Dec 2015 #21
Thank you, NYT frazzled Dec 2015 #11
Waste of column inches. Aristus Dec 2015 #12
Why an editorial? Why not a fact based article? pipoman Dec 2015 #18
Good for the nytimes. Past time! riversedge Dec 2015 #19
Big K&R - it is time for civilized folks TBF Dec 2015 #22
What was the 1920 Editorial about? houston16revival Dec 2015 #23
According to the article the nomination of Harding to be President happyslug Dec 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gun Debate Yields Page 1 ...»Reply #13