Latest Breaking News

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)

85. Any fucking rifle round will penetrate a bullet resistant vest.

Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:22 AM

Dec 2015

They're not bulletproof vests, they're bullet resistance vests and just about ANY standard rifle round will penetrate one of those vests.

What part of armor piercing bullets are illegal for civilian use did you not understand?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

168 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

White House Readies Executive Action On Gun Control [View all] kpete Dec 2015 OP

talking points is right Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #1

Only a few states require gun show background checks. ErikJ Dec 2015 #2

but all dealers Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #3

EZ to get around. And the parking lot is where the real action is. ErikJ Dec 2015 #19

Sorry, but that's just a myth and false. GGJohn Dec 2015 #70

lol. Check this out. ErikJ Dec 2015 #76

I said rarely, and BTW, that NYT story has been throughly debunked, GGJohn Dec 2015 #77

Did you read how most gun dealers at gun shows sold them a gun anyway after they didnt qualify? ErikJ Dec 2015 #79

Why don't you actually watch the uncut version and then get back to me? GGJohn Dec 2015 #81

They gave them bogus info that would disqualify them ErikJ Dec 2015 #83

As I said, Bloomberg almost got his sorry ass arrested for that stunt.. GGJohn Dec 2015 #84

What does that have to do with whether or not guns are being sold without background checks? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #101

It has everything to do with it. GGJohn Dec 2015 #103

Are people buying WITHOUT passing background checks or not? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #104

Those videos were altered to reflect that, much like what O'keefe did with Planned Parenthood. eom GGJohn Dec 2015 #105

are people buying weapons without passing background checks? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #106

Private sales don't require background checks in most states, GGJohn Dec 2015 #107

Are they or aren't they? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #108

I already answered your question. GGJohn Dec 2015 #109

Then why are you denying that it occurs? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #112

When did I deny it happens? GGJohn Dec 2015 #113

Then WTF difference did THAT make.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #114

It makes all the fucking difference, GGJohn Dec 2015 #115

No it doesn't VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #116

No, it's not true. GGJohn Dec 2015 #117

I disagree. hollowdweller Dec 2015 #67

but according to your statement...it will do SOMETHING to reduce it... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #102

Sure. It is a very small restriction. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #118

so what's the problem then? It won't be a further burden on gun owners. patsimp Dec 2015 #4

I have no issue with it Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #5

All sales should go through a background check madville Dec 2015 #8

In Pennsylvania Sales of Pistols can be done via the County Sheriff happyslug Dec 2015 #58

The "internet sales" one irks me madville Dec 2015 #9

I so agree with you Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #11

perhaps internet sales include things like craig's list, where it is individual sellers passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #29

a very small part and if that Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #31

and I am sure you agree Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #33

I think many politicians and people madville Dec 2015 #36

please do not confuse him with Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #37

Who is him? passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #57

Good for you hollowdweller Dec 2015 #72

I didn't shout or stamp my feet, passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #73

You can't sell guns on Craigslist hollowdweller Dec 2015 #69

Why exactly are you and your friends here? onehandle Dec 2015 #10

the Democratic party Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #13

Harmlessly passing your time in the grassland away; onehandle Dec 2015 #14

The 2nd Amend is now obsolete. ErikJ Dec 2015 #22

So all you need to do is get it repealed hack89 Dec 2015 #40

Or significantly amend it ErikJ Dec 2015 #43

Agreed- take out the militia part hack89 Dec 2015 #44

Or maybe only allow REAL citizen militias ErikJ Dec 2015 #59

No. hack89 Dec 2015 #60

Hunters could keep their rifles in an armory between hunts. ErikJ Dec 2015 #63

My firearms are just fine where they're at, in my house in my safes. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #71

Try getting that one passed. hollowdweller Dec 2015 #75

No hack89 Dec 2015 #100

Well then it's a good thing that very few citizens have assault rifles. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #61

AR-15's are hot sales right now. ErikJ Dec 2015 #64

Those aren't assault rifles, GGJohn Dec 2015 #65

But they can easily be modified to be automatics ErikJ Dec 2015 #66

That's false, GGJohn Dec 2015 #68

You can use a rubberband to modify an AR-15 to be auto-fire ErikJ Dec 2015 #78

Jeezus Christ, using a rubber band is considered by the ATF as highly illegal and will earn GGJohn Dec 2015 #80

lol! Do u really think a mass shooter is worried about whats legal? U a rube or something? ErikJ Dec 2015 #82

Any fucking rifle round will penetrate a bullet resistant vest. GGJohn Dec 2015 #85

The bullets they used have 3 times the speed and force of regular bullets which ErikJ Dec 2015 #86

Again, ANY rifle round will penetrate ballistic vests and walls. GGJohn Dec 2015 #87

Take it up with the ATF then. ErikJ Dec 2015 #89

that guy did not know what the fuck he Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #91

You just couldn't resist could you. GGJohn Dec 2015 #94

Exactly lancer78 Dec 2015 #132

The AR-15 is an "ASSAULT RIFLE" which must be banned from sale in the US ErikJ Dec 2015 #133

Sorry. pablo_marmol Dec 2015 #136

lol. U've been rube-duped by the NRA/GOP propaganda machine. ErikJ Dec 2015 #137

Yes. You can lie all you want.......... pablo_marmol Dec 2015 #138

Yes my 20+ years in the miltary Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #144

lol. AR-15 is heavily used for combat situations. ErikJ Dec 2015 #146

Where do you come up with this shit? GGJohn Dec 2015 #147

lol. It was INVENTED by the US Army as a lightweight Assault Rifle. ErikJ Dec 2015 #152

Fuckng LOL. GGJohn Dec 2015 #155

yes that original pre-M16 AR-15 was an assault rifle Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #159

Just what combat situations is the AR-15 used? Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #148

to bad there is no fixing Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #141

Please just stop Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #140

"Rapid fire up to 100 magazines" pablo_marmol Dec 2015 #143

better stock up on magazines Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #145

LOL! Perfect exhibition of Controller foolishness on two counts: pablo_marmol Dec 2015 #156

"Three times the power" of a 30-06? Marengo Dec 2015 #92

a person that does not know Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #96

What is a "regular" gun? ileus Dec 2015 #110

You have it backwards: AR-15's are 1/3 the power of most regular centerfire guns NickB79 Dec 2015 #123

NickB79: Exactly. Handguns ave. around 400 ft.lbs and AR-15 is around 12-1500 ft.lbs. ErikJ Dec 2015 #124

and you would be incorrect once again Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #127

Duck935: Yes it is an Assault Rifle. ErikJ Dec 2015 #129

sorry but that original Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #130

Duck935: Sorry, AR-15 is easily one of the BEST "Assault Rifles" ErikJ Dec 2015 #131

ATF definition Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #134

Duck935: More ErikJ Dec 2015 #135

M16 is an assault rifle Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #139

Your own fucking link proves you wrong about the AR-15. GGJohn Dec 2015 #150

lol. Only difference is M16 has a 3 round burst. ErikJ Dec 2015 #154

There are numerous differences between the AR-15 and the M-16, GGJohn Dec 2015 #158

So what you're in effect saying is........... pablo_marmol Dec 2015 #160

"faST AS U CAN PULL THE TRIGGER." Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #161

and you would be incorrect again, lol Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #162

........"Gun used in the San Bernardino massacre is a mass shooting mainstay" ErikJ Dec 2015 #166

you are partially correct about these 4 Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #168

let's take the ambiguity out of the 2A to cement its place in the Bill of Rights... sanatanadharma Dec 2015 #126

Keep on disparaging gun owners......it's a real political winner dontcha know! pablo_marmol Dec 2015 #165

Go and read the Heller decision hollowdweller Dec 2015 #74

Have you read Heller?? happyslug Dec 2015 #90

The problem is that is NOT the law..... happyslug Dec 2015 #88

Annoying you, while not a primary reason, is certainly a worthwhile endeavor. Nt hack89 Dec 2015 #18

Weak. Darb Dec 2015 #21

ooh, that was an awesome comeback Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #26

I see that I got all three of you. Darb Dec 2015 #119

Look at you - all morally superior and shit. hack89 Dec 2015 #38

Nailed it, obviously, with the three of you rushing in to whine. Darb Dec 2015 #120

But your only contributions to gun threads are insults hack89 Dec 2015 #122

of course we will respond when all you have is insults Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #128

Wow, that's deep, GGJohn Dec 2015 #46

And a triple! Got em all. I notice the rofl emojie is in two of yall's replies, must Darb Dec 2015 #121

And another deep, intellectual response. GGJohn Dec 2015 #151

yep Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #25

Maybe promoting Constitutional rights. former9thward Dec 2015 #20

Probably because of the name, thinking there might be some real ones here? pocoloco Dec 2015 #30

yep Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #35

Good question. MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #42

glad we do not have to abide by your Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #47

Why? GGJohn Dec 2015 #49

You've been here for less than a month and already your telling us pro 2A Democrats to leave? GGJohn Dec 2015 #54

I've "been" here 13 fucking years. MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #125

... GGJohn Dec 2015 #153

maybe he slipped up and outed himself, lol Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #163

It appears he didn't know that everyone can see his profile, GGJohn Dec 2015 #164

And who the hell are you to be asking? GGJohn Dec 2015 #45

some think so Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #48

'Them' onehandle Dec 2015 #50

Yeah, you really are. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #52

I'm not a fan of DuckHunter DashOneBravo Dec 2015 #56

'You' onehandle Dec 2015 #98

Who the hell are you to be asking? GGJohn Dec 2015 #99

Standing-up for individual liberty is always part of true liberalism. appal_jack Dec 2015 #97

But it is legal for people to sell guns at a gun show without BG check if they are not a dealer. Hoyt Dec 2015 #39

it is legal for two private parties Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #41

Really Hoyt? GGJohn Dec 2015 #51

I will be voting for the Democratic nominee rockfordfile Dec 2015 #167

What recent shootings would have been prevented madville Dec 2015 #6

you are correct Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #12

All recent shootings would have been prevented without the Republican Corporate SCOTUS in charge. onehandle Dec 2015 #15

You really believe that? Nt hack89 Dec 2015 #17

and just how would that have been accomplished? Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #27

Why exactly are you and your friends here? onehandle Dec 2015 #32

I knew you could not answer a simple question Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #34

Why won't you answer a simple question instead of attempting to distract GGJohn Dec 2015 #55

I'll answer that......... pablo_marmol Dec 2015 #142

Really? GGJohn Dec 2015 #53

certainly not the San Bernadino one DustyJoe Dec 2015 #23

not to sure about that Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #28

The law doesn't require the receiver of the gun to be "prohibited" for it to be a "straw purchase". PoliticAverse Dec 2015 #62

seems like this one was classic straw purchase DustyJoe Dec 2015 #93

very possible. Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #95

Everything politicians do is for PR harun Dec 2015 #111

That'll mobilize the voters come Nov. '16, indeed. eom Purveyor Dec 2015 #7

It's s start mwrguy Dec 2015 #16

Do it SCantiGOP Dec 2015 #24

Yea but when finally? ArnoldLayne Dec 2015 #149

It is sad to have a Congress unable to enact sensible rules for fear of the Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #157