Latest Breaking News

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)

41. I like how you think beyond the smoke & mirrors, to ask the right questions.

Wed Dec 16, 2015, 09:01 PM

Dec 2015

I've been haunted by these reports of numerous eye-witnesses all agreeing that there were "3 shooters".

Regardless of whether they were all "tall athletic white men", or if one was actually a small female, three
shooters is three shooters. It's very difficult to imagine someone mistaking a male / female couple for
three male shooters. It just makes no sense to me.

If you haven't seen this, I posted it in reply to another post on this string. It's a CBS Scott Pelley phone
interview with one of the witnesses saying there were 3 shooters. I was glad I found it because much
of the chatter on the inter-webs is on RW sites, ones that can't be posted here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

76 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FBI on San Bernardino massacre: Alleged shooters did NOT post support for jihad on social media [View all] azurnoir Dec 2015 OP

WTF!! The Media Lied Before? billhicks76 Dec 2015 #1

WTF is right. FBI sux 840high Dec 2015 #2

well Blitzer certainly does Brainstormy Dec 2015 #4

He knows all about being in Jeopardy.... Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2015 #10

LOL that is precious. nt navarth Dec 2015 #22

Go Andy!!! They_Live Dec 2015 #42

at the time of the attack. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #3

"alleged shooters"? former9thward Dec 2015 #5

No, this is about the competence of the Obama administration DougW659 Dec 2015 #7

No, the headline reads "alleged shooters". former9thward Dec 2015 #9

I think the confusion comes from the fact that many are unaware WatchWhatISay Dec 2015 #13

I think it will stay "alleged" until all the ballistic tests are complete. If all the shots were LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #20

Plus there's the apparent disappearance of the third shooter multiple witnesses say they saw. PSPS Dec 2015 #30

I would hope that they know who the person is (if he exists) and are just watching the person LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #31

If they had discovered which mosque she attended TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #33

And what mosque was that? mhatrw Dec 2015 #60

legally I guess they're currently innocent until proven guilty magical thyme Dec 2015 #14

What makes them so obviously guilty? mhatrw Dec 2015 #19

The carload of guns and ammo they had on them when they engaged in a firefight with police? NickB79 Dec 2015 #29

Produce the videos taken from multiple cameras at multple angles. mhatrw Dec 2015 #57

they apparently knew the police were after them magical thyme Dec 2015 #74

Yeah, a guy with guns had some ammo in his house. So what? mhatrw Dec 2015 #75

do you have a link to those police reports? because my searches are coming up empty magical thyme Dec 2015 #76

I think she did not do it. mhatrw Dec 2015 #21

Did they ever find that 3rd shooter? 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #6

So the massive gun battle the couple had with police was what, then? NickB79 Dec 2015 #8

Good questions all. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #11

Occam's Razor would suggest the witnesses were incorrect NickB79 Dec 2015 #15

Name one witness who saw a woman shooter. You cannot. mhatrw Dec 2015 #17

Wait, they wore tactical gear and facemasks, but unnamed witnesses say they saw white muscular men? NickB79 Dec 2015 #28

San Bernardino Shooting Eyewitness (Sally Abdelmageed) "3 Tall Athletic White Men" 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #40

What? That's not a witness talking. That is an unnamed source in the "fog of war". mhatrw Dec 2015 #43

Forensics 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #39

Forensics? We are the Federalis! We don't need no stinkin' forensics! nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #70

They were not pipe bombs. mhatrw Dec 2015 #18

And the shoot-out with police, caught on camera? NickB79 Dec 2015 #24

LOL. Even after the anthrax attacks & the WMDs, some still believe anything they try to sell you. mhatrw Dec 2015 #44

and weapons in their vehicle. 840high Dec 2015 #25

Show me the tape showing weapons in the vehicle. mhatrw Dec 2015 #45

Tiz amazing. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #72

But it sure didn't stop Comey from using San Bernardino as a pretext . . . markpkessinger Dec 2015 #12

LOL at anyone who believed the FBI's story on this workplace shooting mhatrw Dec 2015 #16

She wasn't wearing a hijab in the suburban TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #35

There is no evidence whatsoever that she ever used a gun in her life. mhatrw Dec 2015 #46

The mosque she attended in Pakistan was radical TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #50

I don't think she ever fired a gun in her life. mhatrw Dec 2015 #53

Sorry, but there were too many witnesses to follow TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #54

What witness saw a women shooter? Name one. mhatrw Dec 2015 #59

OFFS, GGJohn Dec 2015 #52

You are the one who unquestioningly believes in a conspiracy theory. mhatrw Dec 2015 #55

Without a shred of evidence? GGJohn Dec 2015 #56

You have not been keeping up with the news. mhatrw Dec 2015 #61

Maybe you missed the part where I said "bomb making factory" in their house? GGJohn Dec 2015 #63

Have fun in unquestioning fear mongering CT land. mhatrw Dec 2015 #64

Not what I said, nor have ever said, GGJohn Dec 2015 #67

I like how you think beyond the smoke & mirrors, to ask the right questions. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #41

Props to Comey for admitting it. ucrdem Dec 2015 #23

Were they not shooting at 840high Dec 2015 #26

If they were I haven't seen any evidence of it. ucrdem Dec 2015 #27

They were identified at the Xmas party. 840high Dec 2015 #37

There was a story in the SB Sun about a man at the IRC. Update: link ucrdem Dec 2015 #38

Really? Link? mhatrw Dec 2015 #47

They're still the terrorists TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #32

Yes, I've heard that responsibly reported, ucrdem Dec 2015 #34

He bought two of the weapons. TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #36

He has supposedly waived his Miranda rights and is discussing this w/o a lawyer. mhatrw Dec 2015 #49

Based on the report of yet another unnamed "law enforcement" source! mhatrw Dec 2015 #48

But not before using it as a pretext for furthering his anti-encryption campaign ... markpkessinger Dec 2015 #58

If the Farooks really executed the worst Muslim terrorist act on US soil since 9/11, mhatrw Dec 2015 #51

Two things stuck out to me NJCher Dec 2015 #62

Three things that surprised me about the apartment. Jesus Malverde Dec 2015 #65

Strange? Considering what this couple has been accused of, I'd go a bit further. nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #66

there are still twelve people dead. Posting support for jihad or not does not ease the grief. demosincebirth Dec 2015 #68

16 shot, including Farook. 13 were county health inspectors, and they were strict. ucrdem Dec 2015 #69

organized crime meets "homeland security" mhatrw Dec 2015 #71

It might take a while to sort this one out. ucrdem Dec 2015 #73