Conservative group asks probe of Clinton move for son-in-law

[Jarqui]

26. It keeps coming. Today:

Judicial Watch Sues State Department for Top Clinton Aides’ Ethics Documents DECEMBER 16, 2015
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-state-department-for-top-clinton-aides-ethics-documents/


Intelligence agencies say 2 Clinton emails were 'top secret,' but one is no longer
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/hillary-clinton-emails-top-secret-216802#ixzz3uXQqZQ00

The intelligence community is standing by its conclusion that two emails sent to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton contained information classified "Top Secret" at the time it was sent

http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/stossel/blog/2015/12/16/end-year

Now Republicans demand the IRS audit the Clinton Foundation. Where are the guardrails here? "When did conservatives go from wanting to abolish the IRS to wanting to use it to punish rivals?"

Recent Dec 11th:
JW Sues for Details on Massive Hillary Clinton Russian Uranium Scandal
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/another-benghazi-smoking-gun-2/

Also at that Dec 11th link:
Another Benghazi Smoking Gun

Contrary to what the Obama administration has told the American people, the U.S. military was poised and ready to respond immediately and forcefully against terrorists in Benghazi, Libya.

That’s what we have learned from an email exchange from then-Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash to State Department leadership immediately offering “forces that could move to Benghazi” during the terrorist attack on the U.S. Special Mission Compound in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012. In an email sent to top Department of State officials, at 7:19 p.m. ET, only hours after the attack had begun, Bash says, “we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak.” The Obama administration redacted the details of the military forces available, oddly citing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption that allows the withholding of “deliberative process” information.

Bash’s email seems to directly contradict testimony given by then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta before the Senate Armed Services Committee in February 2013. Defending the Obama administration’s lack of military response to the nearly six-hour-long attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Panetta claimed that “time, distance, the lack of an adequate warning, events that moved very quickly on the ground prevented a more immediate response.”

This latest bombshell your Judicial Watch has released to the public has attracted considerable media attention. Here is how the Washington Examiner reported on these revelations:

While parts of the email were redacted, the message indicates the Pentagon was waiting for approval from the State Department to send the forces in. That help never arrived for the Americans under siege at the Benghazi compound. A spokesman for the House Select Committee on Benghazi said investigators had received the unredacted version of the email, which was obtained by Judicial Watch through the Freedom of Information Act and made public Tuesday, last year but had declined to make it public.

Now would be a good time to go back and review the Obama administration’s many prevarications on the Benghazi terrorist attacks. (A significant collection of our history-making work on the Benghazi scandal is available here.)

There's still 1/3 of her 55,000 pages of emails to come ...

Of course, reporting what is floating around in the news is "smearing" poor Hillary.
In fact, I think it's just a sampling of what is to come in the general election.