Latest Breaking News

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)

105. better get busier!

Reply to Ned_Devine (Reply #70)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:00 PM

Dec 2015

it just got tougher!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

108 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fired Sanders aide: I wasn't peeking at Clinton Data Files [View all] Divernan Dec 2015 OP

hahahahahahahahahahahahahah VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #1

Wow! a 1 minute dump-on-the-thread turnaround time. Divernan Dec 2015 #9

the thread was already so full of "dump" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #10

& another less than a minute turnaround. Such diligence! Divernan Dec 2015 #12

LOL! (nt) CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #20

It needed more than 3 seconds? To figure out he was caught red handed? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #27

It's a good tactic. Monitor the new OP's and jump in the number one response slot. rhett o rick Dec 2015 #38

what else do they have. it's not like hill roguevalley Dec 2015 #55

I'd stop short of calling it a "good" tactic Plucketeer Dec 2015 #91

One does wonder what the quid pro quo is. Divernan Dec 2015 #92

It's a tag team thing. It's easier that actually trying to debate issues. nm rhett o rick Dec 2015 #93

Actually, it does. hopeforchange2008 Dec 2015 #26

THIS is not in the least bit plausible..... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #29

Those not familiar with integrity might not recognize the signs... hopeforchange2008 Dec 2015 #41

No they sure wouldn't... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #44

How is that campaign "integrity" working out for them now??? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #104

He was an experienced professional 6chars Dec 2015 #53

EXACTLY! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #54

That "director" is full of horseshit! leftofcool Dec 2015 #56

As plausible as this... EndElectoral Dec 2015 #99

feeling desperate huh? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #103

This message was self-deleted by its author ViseGrip Dec 2015 #101

I don't see how this is funny. U of M Dem Dec 2015 #58

Of course you don't.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #59

I repeat: U of M Dem Dec 2015 #62

Don't waste your time with them. Ned_Devine Dec 2015 #63

Yeah you better get busy... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #69

Oh, we're already on it. Ned_Devine Dec 2015 #70

better get busier! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #105

Piss off Ned_Devine Dec 2015 #108

I understand that option, to put others on ignore... U of M Dem Dec 2015 #80

Yeah....that Bernie's supporters are above reproach! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #68

Sometimes the truth angrychair Dec 2015 #76

ZING! U of M Dem Dec 2015 #100

Some people laugh when their opponent gets hurt. zeemike Dec 2015 #71

This is going to end up blowing up for the DNC. There are laws about liability and responsibility newthinking Dec 2015 #74

I won't hold my breath waiting for that to happen. zeemike Dec 2015 #75

This involved PII (Personally Identifiable Information). There are many laws and obligations newthinking Dec 2015 #82

I understand the concept of Schadenfreude U of M Dem Dec 2015 #83

If you worked in IT you would know this is as possible as not newthinking Dec 2015 #72

Yes I do work in IT...have for over 10 yrs professionally... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #73

You are obviously not involved in data security newthinking Dec 2015 #84

Yes I was for a time... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #85

Not saying it is impossible. I am saying the wrong questions are being sought newthinking Dec 2015 #87

It doesn't matter that the firewall was down VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #88

^^^^ THIS ^^^^ Tarheel_Dem Dec 2015 #107

My theory. Helen Borg Dec 2015 #2

I was thinking the same thing SmittynMo Dec 2015 #5

hahahahahahahaha VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #11

Probably, yes. n/t Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #19

That's very true! CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #24

and rtracey Dec 2015 #28

It's politics...you have to scapegoat someone to cool down the issue... Human101948 Dec 2015 #36

I don't really know... CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #37

Was Dean scream a big deal? Helen Borg Dec 2015 #95

It's an attempt to "make nice" with the DNC. jeff47 Dec 2015 #39

Ahh the inevitable false flag sharp_stick Dec 2015 #33

... questionseverything Dec 2015 #78

If there was ill intent this looks more like LIHOP newthinking Dec 2015 #86

Unless the person on the Clinton campaign had access to proprietary software justiceischeap Dec 2015 #98

Considering the sensitive nature of such things, he should have his supervisor aware of it first. Bubzer Dec 2015 #3

agreed. magical thyme Dec 2015 #16

How do you get away with comparing Hillary to a smelly turd??? LOL pocoloco Dec 2015 #17

I assume you're talking about my sig line? Your interpretation is wrong. Bubzer Dec 2015 #32

this is Rovian tactic--falsely attack candidate in his supposed area of strength (trustworthiness) zazen Dec 2015 #4

Whow. so now you have conjured up a conspiracy theory--and blame Hillary and DWS instead of riversedge Dec 2015 #7

this "makes me look small?" . . . bless your heart! n/t zazen Dec 2015 #14

You guys trying to gain oh-so much mileage out of this... CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #25

And you are naive about politics... Human101948 Dec 2015 #42

Are you kidding me? I live in Iowa... CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #47

Amen! Human101948 Dec 2015 #50

Bravo! Nedsdag Dec 2015 #77

looking small? grahampuba Dec 2015 #35

The campaign followed security protocol and dismissed the person on their side newthinking Dec 2015 #89

Exactly. seabeckind Dec 2015 #8

You bring up a good point...related to Clinton's emails CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #31

Amusing LeFleur1 Dec 2015 #65

umm. so there is a "we' to this story!! more drip riversedge Dec 2015 #6

LOL! This is rich. The cat with a canary in his mouth: "I was hiding him from the dog." Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #13

"I was not having sex with the prostitute, I was doing research." yellowcanine Dec 2015 #15

LMAO! MrWendel Dec 2015 #30

Hey madokie Dec 2015 #18

The Clintons have been fighting dirty for years. Nedsdag Dec 2015 #79

Oh yeah madokie Dec 2015 #96

Given the keystroke capturing of sw these days, demanding Sanders' campaign 'give it up' magical thyme Dec 2015 #21

Excellent point! Thank you! Divernan Dec 2015 #22

Hmmmmm.... MrWendel Dec 2015 #23

This wasn't a lone wolf operation of just Josh Uretsky.... Historic NY Dec 2015 #34

3 people. w4rma Dec 2015 #40

"Hey kids look what I found".... Historic NY Dec 2015 #45

Were they all looking at the data together? CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #49

"breach was shut down presumably by the vendor" So the 'vendor' has access to those files? Sunlei Dec 2015 #43

Doesn't that mean that the Clinton camp had access to Sander's campaign info? CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #52

Guess her staff is more ethical ... LannyDeVaney Dec 2015 #60

I'm wondering why such a glaring security issue... CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #64

The VAN IT guy was Hillary's IT guy in 2008. Conflict for DWS to hire him. He opened the firewall! ViseGrip Dec 2015 #102

Doubling.... HoosierCowboy Dec 2015 #46

I love the smell of desperation in the morning. mountain grammy Dec 2015 #48

Well, did you have a blingfold on? riversedge Dec 2015 #51

Bernie won't be swiftboated NowSam Dec 2015 #57

Why was he fired? brooklynite Dec 2015 #66

To demonstrate quick action and remove any appearance of impropriety NowSam Dec 2015 #67

Exactly. EndElectoral Dec 2015 #106

Of course if it was on the other shoe and a HRC staffer were saying this book_worm Dec 2015 #61

This from the campaign that conceived the Birther campaign. Nedsdag Dec 2015 #81

There is not one word of truth to that assertion. (eom) StevieM Dec 2015 #94

This message was self-deleted by its author valerief Dec 2015 #90

This message was self-deleted by its author jg10003 Dec 2015 #97