Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
12. hunting companies contribute only 3 percent of their revenue to communities living in hunting areas
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 01:56 PM
Dec 2015

South Africa is already the second largest economy on the continent, and accounts for 24% of the continents GDP. Trophy hunting accounts for a fraction of that tourism contributed to South Africa’s GDP in 2013. About 8,500 trophy hunters visit South Africa each year, compared to around 9.5 million tourists.

A resource economist who worked across Southern Africa and established a national environmental economics program in Namibia, Dr Jon Barnes, wrote in a 2001 paper: “Consumptive wildlife uses [such as hunting] are relatively unimportant in terms of economic contribution..."

That being said, the theory that money from trophy hunting goes directly into communities and conservation is questionable at best. Research published by the pro-hunting International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization found that that hunting companies contribute only 3 percent of their revenue to communities living in hunting areas. And according to a 2013 report by the International Fund for Animal Welfare, trophy hunting accounts for 0.27 percent or less of the GDP of each African country in which it’s conducted.

(Why Are We Still Hunting Lions?" National Geographic Magazine)

"There will be consequences as well as benefits." Fewer lion deaths, your allegations notwithstanding...

About damn time. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2015 #1
+10000 trillion Dec 2015 #21
Actually Should Ban Importation Of ALL Trophy Animals Except For Scientific Or Conservation. TheMastersNemesis Dec 2015 #2
Killing for recreation is an abomination. EOM navarth Dec 2015 #3
I'd be happy dressing up in a bullet proof Lion suit. I could take my trophy heads home and... BlueJazz Dec 2015 #4
Even as a little kid, I understood and respected the idea of "shooting" Aristus Dec 2015 #5
700 lions at $20,000, that's $14M not going to Africa JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2015 #6
hunting companies contribute only 3 percent of their revenue to communities living in hunting areas LanternWaste Dec 2015 #12
Yet nations that allow controlled hunting have the largest lion populations left in Africa NickB79 Dec 2015 #13
Interesting editorial. LanternWaste Dec 2015 #14
The original study was peer-reviewed and published in PNAS this year NickB79 Dec 2015 #15
I'm South African FarrenH Dec 2015 #16
Many of those people will still go to Africa, wickerwoman Dec 2015 #17
Greatest fear of all for these freaks is any law making it harder to harm or destroy others. Judi Lynn Dec 2015 #7
Lion "trophies?" farleftlib Dec 2015 #8
+1 SunSeeker Dec 2015 #9
They have gone irredeemably sick, deteriorated inside. Wildly sub-human. Judi Lynn Dec 2015 #10
LION HUNTING INDUSTRY??!? Herman4747 Dec 2015 #11
This was discussed last week.. From a New York Times article happyslug Dec 2015 #18
Breeders will produce thousands more to meet the the 'bred in captivity' exception. Sunlei Dec 2015 #19
The irony of it is that this will probably hurt conservation efforts Taitertots Dec 2015 #20
There are always unintended consequences when decisions like this are made Calista241 Dec 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»South Africa's lion hunti...»Reply #12