Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
34. Bingo, but only if you own the pollen patent.
Mon May 28, 2012, 07:28 PM
May 2012

I was completely unaware of GMOs and the plight of farmers before reading this article four years ago.

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805

INVESTIGATION

May 2008

Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear


Monsanto already dominates America’s food chain with its genetically modified seeds. Now it has targeted milk production. Just as frightening as the corporation’s tactics–ruthless legal battles against small farmers–is its decades-long history of toxic contamination.

by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele

Gary Rinehart clearly remembers the summer day in 2002 when the stranger walked in and issued his threat. Rinehart was behind the counter of the Square Deal, his “old-time country store,” as he calls it, on the fading town square of Eagleville, Missouri, a tiny farm community 100 miles north of Kansas City.

The Square Deal is a fixture in Eagleville, a place where farmers and townspeople can go for lightbulbs, greeting cards, hunting gear, ice cream, aspirin, and dozens of other small items without having to drive to a big-box store in Bethany, the county seat, 15 miles down Interstate 35.

Everyone knows Rinehart, who was born and raised in the area and runs one of Eagleville’s few surviving businesses. The stranger came up to the counter and asked for him by name.

“Well, that’s me,” said Rinehart.

As Rinehart would recall, the man began verbally attacking him, saying he had proof that Rinehart had planted Monsanto’s genetically modified (G.M.) soybeans in violation of the company’s patent. Better come clean and settle with Monsanto, Rinehart says the man told him—or face the consequences.

Rinehart was incredulous, listening to the words as puzzled customers and employees looked on. Like many others in rural America, Rinehart knew of Monsanto’s fierce reputation for enforcing its patents and suing anyone who allegedly violated them. But Rinehart wasn’t a farmer. He wasn’t a seed dealer. He hadn’t planted any seeds or sold any seeds. He owned a small—a really small—country store in a town of 350 people. He was angry that somebody could just barge into the store and embarrass him in front of everyone. “It made me and my business look bad,” he says. Rinehart says he told the intruder, “You got the wrong guy.”

When the stranger persisted, Rinehart showed him the door. On the way out the man kept making threats. Rinehart says he can’t remember the exact words, but they were to the effect of: “Monsanto is big. You can’t win. We will get you. You will pay.”

Scenes like this are playing out in many parts of rural America these days as Monsanto goes after farmers, farmers’ co-ops, seed dealers—anyone it suspects may have infringed its patents of genetically modified seeds. As interviews and reams of court documents reveal, Monsanto relies on a shadowy army of private investigators and agents in the American heartland to strike fear into farm country. They fan out into fields and farm towns, where they secretly videotape and photograph farmers, store owners, and co-ops; infiltrate community meetings; and gather information from informants about farming activities. Farmers say that some Monsanto agents pretend to be surveyors. Others confront farmers on their land and try to pressure them to sign papers giving Monsanto access to their private records. Farmers call them the “seed police” and use words such as “Gestapo” and “Mafia” to describe their tactics.

<...>



SEE: Supreme Court case 12/2001 written by Justice Thomas, former Monsanto attorney, appointed by GHW Bush. And the hearings focused on alleged misconduct with Anita Hill? Pitiful.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's hard to have symptathy for idiots who attack publically funded research institutes. enki23 May 2012 #1
It's not hare for me. zeemike May 2012 #3
And atuism nuts "feel" that vaccines are evil. So what? enki23 May 2012 #4
No one forces you to take the vaccine zeemike May 2012 #5
I wasn't aware "public funded institutions" were such a monolith. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #7
It doesn't kill aphids - it's like an aphid 'alarm' phermone muriel_volestrangler May 2012 #27
Plants produce all kinds of defensive chemicals. Scientists study them for effects on human health. yellowcanine May 2012 #49
Your factually grounded argment is persuasive. n/t EFerrari May 2012 #6
100% agree. n/t rayofreason May 2012 #9
+1 (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #13
Oh, please, don't mislead. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #17
This research is in the UK. What does the FDA and Washington DC NickB79 May 2012 #23
Big business, altruism? Read this reporting, though it sounds like a fictional political thriller. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #25
NOTE: Posts #23 and #25 refer to Dr. Arpad Pusztai's work in the UK described in post #18. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #45
Suppression of science free of conflict of interest: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arpad_Pusztai proverbialwisdom May 2012 #18
Another grossly misleading oversimplification. Not up to speed? FORBES on the CDC here. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #20
Keep your pollen out of my fields! Jeffreytaos May 2012 #10
Welcome Jeffery... zeemike May 2012 #12
So can I sue my neighbors for their grass pollen? Igel May 2012 #15
Bingo, but only if you own the pollen patent. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #34
Correction: they could sue YOU for their pollen on your property if they own the pollen patent. proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #57
Yep. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #8
Research? Jeffreytaos May 2012 #11
Is all bold the new all caps? (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #14
I was wondering the same thing... KansDem May 2012 #50
DU is not ready for the massive power of bold + caps. (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #52
Science that some people don't support = not really science? 4th law of robotics May 2012 #26
The Grahamites are staging a field burning. Someone inform AgriGen Scootaloo May 2012 #2
Bring your kink-spring guns. NickB79 May 2012 #24
I was hoping it wouldn't fly over everyone's head! Scootaloo Jun 2012 #55
Read the headline.... James48 May 2012 #16
More here: http://taketheflourback.org/ proverbialwisdom May 2012 #19
Obama to unveil plan for helping African farmers may3rd May 2012 #22
Sad. "We know that their primary goal is not anybody’s food security but their own bottom line." proverbialwisdom May 2012 #31
Again, "Unlike big companies, small-scale women farmers do NOT grab millions of acres of land proverbialwisdom May 2012 #32
He can't have it both ways. Either help Africa or help agribusiness, but they're mutually exclusive WriteWrong May 2012 #43
Is this a Monsanto lab experiment destined to african farmers? may3rd May 2012 #21
Says enhanced to fight aphids, hence it makes its own bug spray, hence, yeah Monsanto, bemildred May 2012 #28
No, it makes the natural bug "ew, don't eat this" scent that 400 other plants already do. boppers May 2012 #29
I think a lot of people are not interested in the science 4th law of robotics May 2012 #30
A lot of people had poor science educations. boppers May 2012 #33
Nice summary of absence of consensus among FDA scientists described in 2001 legal brief at link. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #35
FUD boppers May 2012 #40
Fear, uncertainty, doubt? How about independent FDA scientists being overruled by bureaucrats? proverbialwisdom May 2012 #41
Kooks don't get to run the show. boppers May 2012 #42
They already are running the show ... Nihil May 2012 #44
Selection is a slow method to find vertical mutations, variants, and interesting gene transfers. boppers May 2012 #46
I apologise. Nihil May 2012 #47
We argue in many ways. boppers May 2012 #54
You really want to go there? How's the health ofAmerica's children since the introduction of gmos? proverbialwisdom May 2012 #48
The kids are fat, happy, and able to survive a famine. boppers May 2012 #53
Not really selection vs injection. yellowcanine May 2012 #51
Roundup-ready crops do NOT fight weeds. They resist being poisoned by a broad-spectrum herbicide WriteWrong May 2012 #38
You are correct about "Roundup(c)(TM)" crops being resistant to an herbicide. boppers May 2012 #39
Senate defeats attempt to study genetically engineered salmon. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #36
That's what they get for confusing a protest with an action WriteWrong May 2012 #37
5/23/12 Press Release: American Medical Association Considers GMO Labels proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #56
The cavalry is coming. proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #58
"...AMA delegates decided to refer this resolution to a committee that would review recent science." proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #59
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Anti-GM protesters kept f...»Reply #34