Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jalan48

(14,914 posts)
4. Will the labeling of foods for nutritional ingredients content be far behind?-sugars,fat content...
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 11:21 AM
Jan 2016

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

boycott beef and pork saturnsring Jan 2016 #1
Yes indeed. This REQUIRES a swift response!...n/t Lodestar Jan 2016 #2
I Lykes your style. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #179
No--boycott beef and pork that isn't labeled. MADem Jan 2016 #3
That's an important point. Target the boycott to non-labeled meat. (nt) enough Jan 2016 #6
unclear enid602 Jan 2016 #26
Nonsense. It doesn't mandate it---as was the requirement previously. nt MADem Jan 2016 #87
I don't share your optimism. Bernin Jan 2016 #91
It's not optimism--it's simply market forces. Not everyone will care--some will, though. MADem Jan 2016 #94
Market forces should not be at play when it comes to people's health. betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #99
You make the assumption that foreign always equals dangerous, which some might say is MADem Jan 2016 #104
You're arguing that there should be no requirement other than personal choice betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #107
No, I'm not. Let me give you a clue, sport--don't put words in peoples' mouths. You stink at it. MADem Jan 2016 #119
So poor people will not be able to afford the labeled kind and will get sick betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #96
Stop resorting to personal insult and falsehoods as your FIRST line of attack. It makes you look MADem Jan 2016 #113
For now, but the TPP will fix that right up. Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #33
No it won't. Good grief--it's smart business to appeal to consumers by giving them what they want. MADem Jan 2016 #86
Rich people who can afford it will betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #98
How you hate neoliberal dems? How "I" hate people who make false accusations on the internet, MADem Jan 2016 #120
excellent distinction thanks ... nt saturnsring Jan 2016 #41
Dishonest bullshit ! Libertarians and business cartels will betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #93
"As you well know....?" Why are you crawling up my nether regions -- I didn't write or pass this MADem Jan 2016 #100
More dishonest bullshit betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #103
You are behaving in a rude and uncivil fashion. In fact, the more you gripe and whine and insult me MADem Jan 2016 #106
Bottom line is you don't believe in regulation, just consumerism. betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #108
Bottom Line is You Have A Serious Problem Comprehending The Written Word. MADem Jan 2016 #117
I am not a guy or a boy. betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #125
What you are is rude and immature. You might want to work on that. MADem Jan 2016 #129
na na na na na, children, behave or go to your room. olddad56 Jan 2016 #146
There is nothing civil about food poisoning betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #156
You completely owned and operated the other poster, and it was deserved. Well done. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #168
I'm not the one resorting to personal invective, here. nt MADem Jan 2016 #160
very true...not required is not the same as prohibited restorefreedom Jan 2016 #135
Perdue made it a point to let people know--after the Chinese Chicken Change--that their MADem Jan 2016 #137
i think so too. u.s. and others will be bending over backwards restorefreedom Jan 2016 #139
Buy local. Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #17
Yep Bjornsdotter Jan 2016 #72
K&R!!! n/t RKP5637 Jan 2016 #102
Yes. What about chicken? JDPriestly Jan 2016 #50
+ a bazillion! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #51
the article mentions only beef and pork saturnsring Jan 2016 #62
Sorry... IthinkThereforeIAM Jan 2016 #101
Will the labeling of foods for nutritional ingredients content be far behind?-sugars,fat content... jalan48 Jan 2016 #4
I wondered that, too. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #32
We have a local organic butcher shop..... HeartoftheMidwest Jan 2016 #5
Same here. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2016 #23
Me too. I drive by my future food every day. :-) PotatoChip Jan 2016 #42
With everything we know, chernabog Jan 2016 #7
That's a question for the 99.9% who do.... pipoman Jan 2016 #22
Thank you for the extremely clever response. chernabog Jan 2016 #24
observation pipoman Jan 2016 #34
Thank you chernabog Jan 2016 #39
I am a pro cook in a Democratic area.... pipoman Jan 2016 #53
Oh, well then. chernabog Jan 2016 #60
More accurately, 97.5% Xithras Jan 2016 #75
omega 3 can be enhanced by algae and flax restorefreedom Jan 2016 #136
That's the problem with allowing populations to self identify. Xithras Jan 2016 #138
yup, and proves the point restorefreedom Jan 2016 #140
Everything we eat was alive at one time. gvstn Jan 2016 #47
Yes. tecelote Jan 2016 #52
So you will knowingly chernabog Jan 2016 #59
How many years did I hear dogs and cats don't feel pain like humans? gvstn Jan 2016 #64
In 1996 we didn't realize animals felt pain? chernabog Jan 2016 #65
Plenty of times gvstn Jan 2016 #69
You said, "Only in the last 20 years do we recognize that animals have pain sensors. " chernabog Jan 2016 #70
Like my posts or not. gvstn Jan 2016 #114
Ok, so chernabog Jan 2016 #116
Yes, you have to eat something. gvstn Jan 2016 #124
Yes chernabog Jan 2016 #128
Explain to me how plants aren't sentient just because they don't have gvstn Jan 2016 #133
Ok chernabog Jan 2016 #134
We don't eat them alive, you know. FiveGoodMen Jan 2016 #153
What does that have to do with anything? chernabog Jan 2016 #155
You keep talking about how they feel pain. FiveGoodMen Jan 2016 #166
Do your tastebuds chernabog Jan 2016 #170
I've pointed out that the animals don't need to suffer any more than they would in normal life FiveGoodMen Jan 2016 #181
But they do, and they always will chernabog Jan 2016 #182
Yes, plants are undervalued. gvstn Jan 2016 #68
... I can't even chernabog Jan 2016 #71
Yes, but chernabog Jan 2016 #58
But we have to eat something that was alive. gvstn Jan 2016 #73
Plants don't die when you eat them...they grow back chernabog Jan 2016 #76
So you say. gvstn Jan 2016 #82
at this point there is no evidence or scientific consensus restorefreedom Jan 2016 #141
But you were told wrong. a la izquierda Jan 2016 #174
This message was self-deleted by its author TheSarcastinator Jan 2016 #97
Can US producers label their abelenkpe Jan 2016 #8
I am sure they could Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #14
Yes, but... jeff47 Jan 2016 #20
Yes, they've done this for decades. Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #35
Provisions of a treaty like TPP which explicitly restrict speech would be unconstitutional. closeupready Jan 2016 #46
I am fortunate, our meat comes from less than a mile from our house.... peacebird Jan 2016 #9
Raising meat birds is easy. OkSustainAg Jan 2016 #15
welcome to du, and thanks for the offer of information. niyad Jan 2016 #57
These lawsuits through WTO will dismantle Lodestar Jan 2016 #10
And TPP will only be worse. rurallib Jan 2016 #25
Great..... blackspade Jan 2016 #11
The meat industry AND WTO (foreign meat sources). Lodestar Jan 2016 #12
I visited Mexico in 1999. Around the area in which we stayed, there were smelly, putrid JDPriestly Jan 2016 #55
"We don't need to eat meat that is tainted. " chernabog Jan 2016 #63
"In order to have a freedom, information is required. " KansDem Jan 2016 #28
So sorry, my bad. blackspade Jan 2016 #31
True. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #77
Information is fearmongering! Stop fearmongering! Stop truthtelling now! closeupready Jan 2016 #48
expect much whinnying and neigh saying about this reddread Jan 2016 #13
yep, the US lost in a WTO suit Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #16
With any luck, domestic producers will continue to label the source of origin. Buzz Clik Jan 2016 #18
this is so wrong. Baitball Blogger Jan 2016 #19
before 2008 The One was keeping tritium in the drinking water: same dif MisterP Jan 2016 #54
Isn't free trade great?!! (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #21
Has Obama signed this bill into law INdemo Jan 2016 #27
Yes. former9thward Jan 2016 #143
A few months ago I bought some Tilapia INdemo Jan 2016 #147
The WTO had ruled against the U.S. former9thward Jan 2016 #148
So now we have to abide by the WTO rules and our food safety? INdemo Jan 2016 #149
Then we should withdraw from the WTO. former9thward Jan 2016 #150
So now we're kowtowing to the WTO? KansDem Jan 2016 #29
If you belong to world organizations former9thward Jan 2016 #144
Aside from people who use local butchers, bet most don't even know now. Inkfreak Jan 2016 #30
Which is why I stopped eating it. nt bemildred Jan 2016 #36
One more reason I'm glad I get my meat from the Farmers market. Javaman Jan 2016 #37
Worse than where is not knowing what they were fed. And jwirr Jan 2016 #38
That is why rule by corporate decree is such a bad idea. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #79
Exactly the corporations are moving toward building jwirr Jan 2016 #85
Buy from Farmers' Markets Sanity Claws Jan 2016 #40
Get Out The DAMNED Vote SoapBox Jan 2016 #43
PLUS ONE, a huge bunch! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #80
They are such liars. The US unilaterally disregards WTO rulings, at will. closeupready Jan 2016 #44
Huge +1! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #81
never will buy non-labeled meats or any food product not labled with Country of origin. Sunlei Jan 2016 #45
This is bad. gvstn Jan 2016 #49
Well there is North American Bison and North American White Tail and Mule Deer................ turbinetree Jan 2016 #56
My freezer is stocked right now madville Jan 2016 #61
I was given some deer , and I have some Bison in the freezer................................... turbinetree Jan 2016 #67
I'm less concerned with where the meat is from... thesquanderer Jan 2016 #66
For those still eating meat, this is a perfect time to kick the habit. n/t Binkie The Clown Jan 2016 #74
I just won't buy shit that isn't labeled. Not labeling it could denote something suspicious. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #78
The American people have less influence over the legislative process every day. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #83
Thats why I'm going to my local farm market they buy & butcher locally. Historic NY Jan 2016 #84
buy from known, local producers treelover Jan 2016 #88
So, I can pass the cans, bottles, jars of "Made in China (or wherever) BUT: Paper Roses Jan 2016 #89
Not being required to label doesn't mean the same thing as being required not to label matt819 Jan 2016 #90
Basic information - nothing more nothing less, and THAT is considered an unfair trade practice Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #92
Be good to yourself. Dont eat it. roody Jan 2016 #95
Unfortunately Bernin Jan 2016 #105
What recent studies? chernabog Jan 2016 #110
This study Bernin Jan 2016 #112
Too bad they only look at vegetarians chernabog Jan 2016 #115
i can believe the happy part to a degree restorefreedom Jan 2016 #142
I have been one for forty. roody Jan 2016 #154
No more half raw meat, guys, especially pork Warpy Jan 2016 #109
Just don't eat meat at all. chernabog Jan 2016 #111
Some people feel like shit if they don't eat meat Warpy Jan 2016 #118
Yours isn't even a concept. You just made that up. chernabog Jan 2016 #122
the corporate liberturds can adulterate veggies too betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #121
Absolutely people have a right to healthy food. chernabog Jan 2016 #123
Except it isn't meat that is the problem in this case it is the lack of regulation. n/t betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #127
Oh, no it's definitely the meat. chernabog Jan 2016 #130
So when you get ameobic dysentary from contaminated lettuce betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #131
No I was saying that chernabog Jan 2016 #132
Except the topic is unlabled food, not specifically meat betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #158
What is a greedhead and how do they make people vegan? chernabog Jan 2016 #164
OT means offtopic betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #165
Guess it's back to vegetarianism nt Luciferous Jan 2016 #126
That means I switch to local on meat now Le Taz Hot Jan 2016 #145
Me too, and increase the vegetarian diet some. n/t ozone_man Jan 2016 #152
Soylent Green. nt Zorra Jan 2016 #151
Why not just boycott any grocery store that doesnt label the origin of their meat??? cstanleytech Jan 2016 #157
Get off the meat. Start by going to fish. The meat is worse than cigarettes. trillion Jan 2016 #161
Thanks for sharing your unsolicited opinion and have a wonderful day. nt cstanleytech Jan 2016 #162
I'm glad I became a vegetarian decades ago. Meat killed my father - 5 way bypass surgery, then trillion Jan 2016 #159
99% of America are not vegans yet they are living to 70. betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #163
I don't wish anyone to die and I did not say that. Putting crap in poeple's mouths trillion Jan 2016 #172
96.8 percent are still making it to 70 betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #173
Canada should be ashamed Angel Martin Jan 2016 #167
Why do they fight the labeling? treestar Jan 2016 #169
Consumer bias NobodyHere Jan 2016 #171
Consumer choice, you mean? oegthe Jan 2016 #175
You can put it that way NobodyHere Jan 2016 #176
It is not unusual, that there are bad things in a spending bill that also had good things in it. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #177
This is insanity, how in the FUCK is consumer choice "protectionism"? Odin2005 Jan 2016 #178
Our CSA farm provides us with quality beef, pork & poultry raised locally. grntuscarora Jan 2016 #180
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Consumers won’t know meat...»Reply #4