Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R. Nate knows his stuff, and I trust him to be right (again) lunamagica Jan 2016 #1
And terrible news for America. But hey, ifyou'e into the TPP and corps running america she's your trillion Jan 2016 #91
Thanks for the news, but no big surprise. I suspect Sanders has about the same chance as.... George II Jan 2016 #2
I don't think so. I think Sanders is actually doing quite well. trillion Jan 2016 #92
(((hugs))) nice try slumcamper Jan 2016 #3
That line refers to the photo only (((hugs))) nice try riversedge Jan 2016 #5
Hillary's polling has IMPROVED since the debates. pnwmom Jan 2016 #6
Fair enough. We win with either candidate. slumcamper Jan 2016 #11
Solid post ShrimpPoboy Jan 2016 #51
We do not win with Hillary. Wallstreet wins and the planet loses. trillion Jan 2016 #94
Sad isn't it? A babbling, racist, xenophobic, shallow, callous offspring of an orange haired ape Feeling the Bern Jan 2016 #4
The jury spoke neverforget Jan 2016 #19
Apparently, the alerter really hates "Real Time with Bill Maher" because that's who I stole the joke Feeling the Bern Jan 2016 #22
I can't believe you just got alerted for that. Of course I can't believe dems on this site are so trillion Jan 2016 #97
This message was self-deleted by its author trillion Jan 2016 #96
What are you talking about? My post was about Trump being that. . .where the hell do you get Feeling the Bern Jan 2016 #99
I mis read your post. Very Sorry. trillion Jan 2016 #100
Well Good....Then We Can See Hillary with a Favorability Rating under 50% andrewv1 Jan 2016 #7
If Bernie ever gets the media attention he wants, it will come with pnwmom Jan 2016 #9
Yeah Sure, but you are not as easy a target andrewv1 Jan 2016 #12
Obama came with no baggage at all, so the Rethugs invented it. pnwmom Jan 2016 #13
Nobody cares what they say AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #16
The only reason Hillary has a lower approval rating is because more mud pnwmom Jan 2016 #18
Mud schmud AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #20
you forgot non-believer/godless/atheist..... getagrip_already Jan 2016 #34
The finger wagging bugs me, too. Imagine pnwmom Jan 2016 #35
You honestly think... CSStrowbridge Jan 2016 #15
I Hate to Say it, but Yes.... andrewv1 Jan 2016 #17
she wont lose MFM008 Jan 2016 #26
She might. I mean whats the difference between her and a Republican? Nada - on big business. The trillion Jan 2016 #93
Stats AND RECORDS are made to be broken - it's CRUNCH time and the American public vkkv Jan 2016 #8
An H that riversedge Jan 2016 #84
Give the "H" a rest - have a look here & TRY not to be offended by what you see, alright? >>>>>> vkkv Jan 2016 #85
oh my my. Living in your bubble of a skewed DU poll. Continue on riversedge Jan 2016 #88
Oh my my.. New Hampshire and I share that same "skewed bubble". Stop - and think. vkkv Jan 2016 #102
And then there's this... vkkv Jan 2016 #10
What is that? From a DU poll? pnwmom Jan 2016 #14
Link? sheshe2 Jan 2016 #21
Don't bother, it's a "DU Poll". Useless. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #24
Figures. sheshe2 Jan 2016 #25
You were saying? vkkv Jan 2016 #104
I guess you didn't actually read the o.p., did you? Either that, or your reading comprehension is.. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #107
LINK TO Bernie Poll at DU - thanks for asking vkkv Jan 2016 #40
You're equating a DU poll with the guy who accurately predicted all 50 states in 2012? I guess... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #23
And a DU poll where Bernie Sanders BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #33
A DU poll might be fun to look at, but like so many things, it has absolutely no value at all. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #44
Thanks so much, Tarheel_Dem BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #46
Glad to be of assistance. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #48
I don't remember caring enough to ask you your opinion. vkkv Jan 2016 #39
Well, you should have cared enough to ask somebody. Citing a DU poll, in the face of science, has... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #47
Science? It's all speculation. vkkv Jan 2016 #50
I love NC. Lots of water here. Y'all have fun rationing out there, m'kay? And "Hillary Humpers", Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #52
Yah yah "useless" polls - when they don't go your way.. got it. vkkv Jan 2016 #53
"beautiful women (with all of their TEETH even, uh-Hyuck!) " Ugh. Your teenage male fratboy... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #54
What is wrong with you? vkkv Jan 2016 #63
You were saying something about a "laughing stock" ? vkkv Jan 2016 #103
I guess this is your first grownup election, huh? Newsflash: The current President lost NH, and.... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #106
Yes, N.C., what a hellhole! (lol) EX500rider Jan 2016 #75
So.. N.C. requires THAT MUCH Photoshop?? vkkv Jan 2016 #78
No, it's just that pretty. EX500rider Jan 2016 #79
Something wrong with you? Give it a rest. vkkv Jan 2016 #80
"Something wrong with you?" EX500rider Jan 2016 #86
Like most generalizations, there is a reason for them. vkkv Jan 2016 #87
Yes pretty pictures. Thank you! I'm enjoing them. trillion Jan 2016 #101
This message was self-deleted by its author vkkv Jan 2016 #38
They have only been correct Action_Patrol Jan 2016 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author vkkv Jan 2016 #65
Snark when you're wrong just makes you look foolish. Action_Patrol Jan 2016 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author vkkv Jan 2016 #67
Thank you. Since he self-deleted, I'm gonna assume you were able to get through to him. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #77
He was very rude with no provocation. Action_Patrol Jan 2016 #81
He was indeed. I saw where he was coming from, and decided to disengage. n/t Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #83
Nate Silver is a political geek, of course he would be for the establishment AZ Progressive Jan 2016 #27
Nate is a professional stat man who based his anaysis on hard scientific data riversedge Jan 2016 #68
What was his "hard scientific data"? brentspeak Jan 2016 #69
look at his polling data... riversedge Jan 2016 #74
So now Nate is suspect? wow I am calling out Hillary supporters right now on another randys1 Jan 2016 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author Bad Dog Jan 2016 #28
The article isn't that specific and it's cherry picking quotes Wykillin Jan 2016 #29
Weird how they refer to Nate Silver as "the Jewish editor" of 538 oberliner Jan 2016 #30
Neither is Bernie--if referring to religious practice Proserpina Jan 2016 #31
Nate is neither an ethnic Jew nor a religious Jew oberliner Jan 2016 #32
I knew several Silver's Reter Jan 2016 #37
His mother is not Jewish, his father is oberliner Jan 2016 #41
Why did the article mention it at all? elljay Jan 2016 #49
Good question oberliner Jan 2016 #57
Nate describes himself as half-Jewish NobodyHere Jan 2016 #55
No he doesn't oberliner Jan 2016 #56
Actually I was thinking of this NobodyHere Jan 2016 #59
He does not appear to be taking that survey seriously oberliner Jan 2016 #60
Even so NobodyHere Jan 2016 #61
The link I provided suggests that he does not wish to be labelled that way oberliner Jan 2016 #62
I would like to hear Uponthegears Jan 2016 #36
Why are any posts about polls important or significant? oberliner Jan 2016 #42
Violation of LBN forum rules. Also obvious politicking. JackRiddler Jan 2016 #43
This is amongst the easier math problems Nate Silver has deigned to address. geek tragedy Jan 2016 #45
Bernie Sanders would not win against Trump. Oneironaut Jan 2016 #58
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #70
I don't see how Nate can foresee what CAN happen once Bernie's message gets bigger CTyankee Jan 2016 #71
Well, he best hurry up.... cause riversedge Jan 2016 #73
Agreed. I think nate is probably wrong on this. A lot of us dems will consider staying home if trillion Jan 2016 #98
Spot on Nate. riversedge Jan 2016 #72
Nate is correct as to the math Gothmog Jan 2016 #82
It's funny how people always hate Nate Silver when the stats don't agree with their viewpoint MrBig Jan 2016 #89
I vote Democratic! truthisfreedom Jan 2016 #90
Well that is kinda obvious. NT arely staircase Jan 2016 #95
No Republican, Independent or Democrat Aerows Jan 2016 #105
Sounds reasonable, unfortunately. I think Trump can attack Hillary from the Left! frizzled Jan 2016 #108
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Stat whiz Nate Silver: Do...»Reply #14