Latest Breaking News

trillion

(1,859 posts)

93. She might. I mean whats the difference between her and a Republican? Nada - on big business. The

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 04:20 AM

Jan 2016

only reason to vote for her would be the supreme court nominations. She should be in jail. More war, more war and god save the TPP. I though america wanted to get rid of these clowns. Not if the Dems think Hillary is a good idea. And, forget climate change. Hillary only gave lip service. She's telling everyone what they want to hear but some of us actually followed her while she was in congress and she may as well have been a Republican - she sided them and went against the Dems so many times. She's big buisness Hillary - God's gift to wall street.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

108 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Stat whiz Nate Silver: Donald Trump more likely nominee than Bernie Sanders [View all] riversedge Jan 2016 OP

K&R. Nate knows his stuff, and I trust him to be right (again) lunamagica Jan 2016 #1

And terrible news for America. But hey, ifyou'e into the TPP and corps running america she's your trillion Jan 2016 #91

Thanks for the news, but no big surprise. I suspect Sanders has about the same chance as.... George II Jan 2016 #2

I don't think so. I think Sanders is actually doing quite well. trillion Jan 2016 #92

(((hugs))) nice try slumcamper Jan 2016 #3

That line refers to the photo only (((hugs))) nice try riversedge Jan 2016 #5

Hillary's polling has IMPROVED since the debates. pnwmom Jan 2016 #6

Fair enough. We win with either candidate. slumcamper Jan 2016 #11

Solid post ShrimpPoboy Jan 2016 #51

We do not win with Hillary. Wallstreet wins and the planet loses. trillion Jan 2016 #94

Sad isn't it? A babbling, racist, xenophobic, shallow, callous offspring of an orange haired ape Feeling the Bern Jan 2016 #4

The jury spoke neverforget Jan 2016 #19

Apparently, the alerter really hates "Real Time with Bill Maher" because that's who I stole the joke Feeling the Bern Jan 2016 #22

I can't believe you just got alerted for that. Of course I can't believe dems on this site are so trillion Jan 2016 #97

This message was self-deleted by its author trillion Jan 2016 #96

What are you talking about? My post was about Trump being that. . .where the hell do you get Feeling the Bern Jan 2016 #99

I mis read your post. Very Sorry. trillion Jan 2016 #100

Well Good....Then We Can See Hillary with a Favorability Rating under 50% andrewv1 Jan 2016 #7

If Bernie ever gets the media attention he wants, it will come with pnwmom Jan 2016 #9

Yeah Sure, but you are not as easy a target andrewv1 Jan 2016 #12

Obama came with no baggage at all, so the Rethugs invented it. pnwmom Jan 2016 #13

Nobody cares what they say AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #16

The only reason Hillary has a lower approval rating is because more mud pnwmom Jan 2016 #18

Mud schmud AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #20

you forgot non-believer/godless/atheist..... getagrip_already Jan 2016 #34

The finger wagging bugs me, too. Imagine pnwmom Jan 2016 #35

You honestly think... CSStrowbridge Jan 2016 #15

I Hate to Say it, but Yes.... andrewv1 Jan 2016 #17

she wont lose MFM008 Jan 2016 #26

She might. I mean whats the difference between her and a Republican? Nada - on big business. The trillion Jan 2016 #93

Stats AND RECORDS are made to be broken - it's CRUNCH time and the American public vkkv Jan 2016 #8

An H that riversedge Jan 2016 #84

Give the "H" a rest - have a look here & TRY not to be offended by what you see, alright? >>>>>> vkkv Jan 2016 #85

oh my my. Living in your bubble of a skewed DU poll. Continue on riversedge Jan 2016 #88

Oh my my.. New Hampshire and I share that same "skewed bubble". Stop - and think. vkkv Jan 2016 #102

And then there's this... vkkv Jan 2016 #10

What is that? From a DU poll? pnwmom Jan 2016 #14

Link? sheshe2 Jan 2016 #21

Don't bother, it's a "DU Poll". Useless. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #24

Figures. sheshe2 Jan 2016 #25

You were saying? vkkv Jan 2016 #104

I guess you didn't actually read the o.p., did you? Either that, or your reading comprehension is.. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #107

LINK TO Bernie Poll at DU - thanks for asking vkkv Jan 2016 #40

You're equating a DU poll with the guy who accurately predicted all 50 states in 2012? I guess... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #23

And a DU poll where Bernie Sanders BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #33

A DU poll might be fun to look at, but like so many things, it has absolutely no value at all. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #44

Thanks so much, Tarheel_Dem BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #46

Glad to be of assistance. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #48

I don't remember caring enough to ask you your opinion. vkkv Jan 2016 #39

Well, you should have cared enough to ask somebody. Citing a DU poll, in the face of science, has... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #47

Science? It's all speculation. vkkv Jan 2016 #50

I love NC. Lots of water here. Y'all have fun rationing out there, m'kay? And "Hillary Humpers", Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #52

Yah yah "useless" polls - when they don't go your way.. got it. vkkv Jan 2016 #53

"beautiful women (with all of their TEETH even, uh-Hyuck!) " Ugh. Your teenage male fratboy... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #54

What is wrong with you? vkkv Jan 2016 #63

You were saying something about a "laughing stock" ? vkkv Jan 2016 #103

I guess this is your first grownup election, huh? Newsflash: The current President lost NH, and.... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #106

Yes, N.C., what a hellhole! (lol) EX500rider Jan 2016 #75

So.. N.C. requires THAT MUCH Photoshop?? vkkv Jan 2016 #78

No, it's just that pretty. EX500rider Jan 2016 #79

Something wrong with you? Give it a rest. vkkv Jan 2016 #80

"Something wrong with you?" EX500rider Jan 2016 #86

Like most generalizations, there is a reason for them. vkkv Jan 2016 #87

Yes pretty pictures. Thank you! I'm enjoing them. trillion Jan 2016 #101

This message was self-deleted by its author vkkv Jan 2016 #38

They have only been correct Action_Patrol Jan 2016 #64

This message was self-deleted by its author vkkv Jan 2016 #65

Snark when you're wrong just makes you look foolish. Action_Patrol Jan 2016 #66

This message was self-deleted by its author vkkv Jan 2016 #67

Thank you. Since he self-deleted, I'm gonna assume you were able to get through to him. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #77

He was very rude with no provocation. Action_Patrol Jan 2016 #81

He was indeed. I saw where he was coming from, and decided to disengage. n/t Tarheel_Dem Jan 2016 #83

Nate Silver is a political geek, of course he would be for the establishment AZ Progressive Jan 2016 #27

Nate is a professional stat man who based his anaysis on hard scientific data riversedge Jan 2016 #68

What was his "hard scientific data"? brentspeak Jan 2016 #69

look at his polling data... riversedge Jan 2016 #74

So now Nate is suspect? wow I am calling out Hillary supporters right now on another randys1 Jan 2016 #76

This message was self-deleted by its author Bad Dog Jan 2016 #28

The article isn't that specific and it's cherry picking quotes Wykillin Jan 2016 #29

Weird how they refer to Nate Silver as "the Jewish editor" of 538 oberliner Jan 2016 #30

Neither is Bernie--if referring to religious practice Proserpina Jan 2016 #31

Nate is neither an ethnic Jew nor a religious Jew oberliner Jan 2016 #32

I knew several Silver's Reter Jan 2016 #37

His mother is not Jewish, his father is oberliner Jan 2016 #41

Why did the article mention it at all? elljay Jan 2016 #49

Good question oberliner Jan 2016 #57

Nate describes himself as half-Jewish NobodyHere Jan 2016 #55

No he doesn't oberliner Jan 2016 #56

Actually I was thinking of this NobodyHere Jan 2016 #59

He does not appear to be taking that survey seriously oberliner Jan 2016 #60

Even so NobodyHere Jan 2016 #61

The link I provided suggests that he does not wish to be labelled that way oberliner Jan 2016 #62

I would like to hear Uponthegears Jan 2016 #36

Why are any posts about polls important or significant? oberliner Jan 2016 #42

Violation of LBN forum rules. Also obvious politicking. JackRiddler Jan 2016 #43

This is amongst the easier math problems Nate Silver has deigned to address. geek tragedy Jan 2016 #45

Bernie Sanders would not win against Trump. Oneironaut Jan 2016 #58

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #70

I don't see how Nate can foresee what CAN happen once Bernie's message gets bigger CTyankee Jan 2016 #71

Well, he best hurry up.... cause riversedge Jan 2016 #73

Agreed. I think nate is probably wrong on this. A lot of us dems will consider staying home if trillion Jan 2016 #98

Spot on Nate. riversedge Jan 2016 #72

Nate is correct as to the math Gothmog Jan 2016 #82

It's funny how people always hate Nate Silver when the stats don't agree with their viewpoint MrBig Jan 2016 #89

I vote Democratic! truthisfreedom Jan 2016 #90

Well that is kinda obvious. NT arely staircase Jan 2016 #95

No Republican, Independent or Democrat Aerows Jan 2016 #105

Sounds reasonable, unfortunately. I think Trump can attack Hillary from the Left! frizzled Jan 2016 #108