Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hmmm... retrowire Jan 2016 #1
Better late than never RobertEarl Jan 2016 #2
+1 n/t area51 Jan 2016 #44
A strange response anigbrowl Jan 2016 #17
Strange response? retrowire Jan 2016 #19
I think he knows the cost of the plan will destroy his campaign Recursion Jan 2016 #53
He doesn't have the right staff to estimate the financial impact BeatleBoot Jan 2016 #3
funny how the rest of the advanced countries of the world has figured it out... CTyankee Jan 2016 #6
No, they haven't. Switzerland has a plan with both private and public insurance, pnwmom Jan 2016 #8
at least they are on the right track and recognize the need for universal health care... CTyankee Jan 2016 #9
The ACA recognizes that need in the same way Switzerland's plan does. pnwmom Jan 2016 #10
There are major differences. ForgoTheConsequence Jan 2016 #12
There are certainly improvements that SHOULD be made to the ACA. pnwmom Jan 2016 #22
South Korea has a national health insurance plan that covers everyone davidpdx Jan 2016 #42
Japan covers 70% of health care costs and the patient pays 30% Recursion Jan 2016 #48
The same here davidpdx Jan 2016 #50
In England... Helen Borg Jan 2016 #51
Oh dear anigbrowl Jan 2016 #21
He wrote a bill about it in 2013. You'd think he would have had the details ready by now. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #23
If you are an expat please feel free to drop by the Americans Abroad forum and introduce yourself davidpdx Jan 2016 #43
Oh, I meant I come from there but live in the US now :-) anigbrowl Jan 2016 #47
Nope. Almost no other countries have single payer Recursion Jan 2016 #39
Yes. And if Iowa watched the righties, wingnuts and racists underthematrix Jan 2016 #15
I disagree, I think. PSPS Jan 2016 #16
I can also speak about the real world anigbrowl Jan 2016 #25
My god, you think Ireland's health care system is expensive? Rilgin Jan 2016 #31
+1 snort Jan 2016 #36
You misunderstand me anigbrowl Jan 2016 #37
This is a more reasonable post but ignores half of your original Rilgin Jan 2016 #69
anti-government rhetoric? anigbrowl Jan 2016 #70
The "financial aspect" has been studied extensively. joshcryer Jan 2016 #32
I hope so anigbrowl Jan 2016 #38
This is just people making a mountain out of a molehill. joshcryer Jan 2016 #46
That does it. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #4
Taxes, free loaders, takers. Screw that. I'm going Republican! Feeling the Bern Jan 2016 #7
Boy she's on a roll. bkkyosemite Jan 2016 #5
I'm still waiting for the numbers on trickle-down economics and those big trade deals. jalan48 Jan 2016 #11
Nice deflection. RandySF Jan 2016 #13
Hey-we're all worried about numbers. Never too late to clear up some of those big ones from the past jalan48 Jan 2016 #14
Not to mention the numbers from how much money was wasted at the Pentagon. Crowman1979 Jan 2016 #29
presidents don't pass legislation. geek tragedy Jan 2016 #18
Aspirational? How is that different from "empty promises"? nt pnwmom Jan 2016 #24
You start from a strong position. joshcryer Jan 2016 #33
He frames the goals and values, broad strokes. geek tragedy Jan 2016 #35
They want to know the bottom line, which he promised to provide before Iowa. pnwmom Jan 2016 #49
We'll see nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #52
Ahhhh, that explains it. His proposals are "aspirational". Beacool Jan 2016 #45
Unicorns don't have the necessary digits to run calculators. nt onehandle Jan 2016 #20
LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #28
Not sure why so many Democrats like yourself love the status quo Bradical79 Jan 2016 #66
Can anyone point me to where Sanders "pledged" to release full tax plan by 2/1? (nt) thesquanderer Jan 2016 #26
Yes, in this interview: pnwmom Jan 2016 #34
A statement of intent is not a "pledge" thesquanderer Jan 2016 #60
If a pig in a poke does not have a price tag, that means we can't afford it. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #27
How much does it cost to not have everyone insured? Kalidurga Jan 2016 #30
Less, that's why we do it Recursion Jan 2016 #40
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #57
Oh, sorry, did we start giving the uninsured health care? Recursion Jan 2016 #58
Ahhh I love the smell of desperation in the morning coyote Jan 2016 #41
I find it difficult to believe.. cannabis_flower Jan 2016 #54
Since Medicare operates at much less of a cost than private insurance, it's Vinca Jan 2016 #55
About 20% less, all told Recursion Jan 2016 #59
And way more than that if he can get the drug prices lowered significantly. Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2016 #64
DEAD Horse Thread sonofspy777 Jan 2016 #56
What's with the right-wing cartoons? anigbrowl Jan 2016 #68
Well rtracey Jan 2016 #61
I guarantee that it would cost less than what we are doing now. alarimer Jan 2016 #62
The only people who find this plan viable are people without ANY money, who think Congress will MADem Jan 2016 #63
"Pickpocketing the wealthy"? Really? Bradical79 Jan 2016 #67
I am speaking from the perspective of the legislature that will vote on any MADem Jan 2016 #71
Why rush a complicated issue kacekwl Jan 2016 #65
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sanders may not release h...»Reply #64