Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
14. Just Googling, and
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:31 PM
Jan 2016

Defensenews seems to think it's not an issue.
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/commentary/2015/09/14/irans-nuclear-ballistic-missile-threat-not-horizon/72254428/

"Faithfully implementing the Iran nuclear deal and following closely the facts on the ground will ensure that the specter of Iranian nuclear missiles continues to fade below the horizon."


Then this link says it is a big problem: http://www.iranintelligence.com/missiles

"In violation of a United Nations ban on testing of missiles that could possibly deliver a nuclear warhead, Iran tested a new missile known as the Emad in early October 2015. The Emad is a precision-guided long range missile, and is the first guided weapon in Iran's arsenal capable of striking Israel. It is estimated that the missile has a range of over 1,000 miles and an accuracy range of within 1,600 feet."

So I don't have a clue.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Clinton calls for new sanctions on Iran [View all] MowCowWhoHow III Jan 2016 OP
One of the reasons Hillary Clinton is saltpoint Jan 2016 #1
The Saudis must have sent her some $$$ under the table. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #38
Seriously... Hillary has been compromised. Time for that warmonger to just go away. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2016 #54
Once a NeoCon alway a NeoCon awake Jan 2016 #2
Please tell me this is not a Tom Ridge "Code RED" call, which will just benefit the Republicans. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #3
Is she running for Netin'-Yahoo's job? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #4
Meh. Bibi'll never give that gig up. forest444 Jan 2016 #12
Bomb bomb Iran EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #5
I fucking hate Saudi Arabia. Do you happen to have a link? Is this Mook you're talking about? DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #30
Link EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #48
Like always, follow the money. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #39
+1 daleanime Jan 2016 #76
LOL we should call her Hillary Bomb Bomb Clinton Kalidurga Jan 2016 #56
Hahahahahahah EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #62
Hillary McCain? [n/t] Maedhros Jan 2016 #78
LOL even better Kalidurga Jan 2016 #80
Plus 1 mylye2222 Jan 2016 #61
Another shout Plucketeer Jan 2016 #6
Wow! She really is turning far right. padfun Jan 2016 #7
You only get three strikes, Mrs. Clinton Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #8
I just threw up a little. Schema Thing Jan 2016 #10
Nah all the creepy neo-cons are kept out of sight. Nyan Jan 2016 #52
I get it... Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #9
Oh lookie: the warmonger is back truebluegreen Jan 2016 #11
terrible policy position nt tishaLA Jan 2016 #13
Just Googling, and Gregorian Jan 2016 #14
I'm with you on general cluelessness, cheapdate Jan 2016 #42
Hillary is correct - Iran insisted that the missile issue be negotiated seperately. bananas Jan 2016 #44
What restrictions are there on "a country"? cheapdate Jan 2016 #69
The UN is always passing resolutions on "a country" bananas Jan 2016 #81
Thanks for that. cheapdate Jan 2016 #83
She just lost the primary. musiclawyer Jan 2016 #15
I hope you didn't put money on it jamzrockz Jan 2016 #40
I tend to agree Cosmocat Jan 2016 #51
Wow. Is this the real Hillary, or did her advisers give her some very bad advice? BillZBubb Jan 2016 #16
REAL HILLARY. (n/t) SMC22307 Jan 2016 #21
K&R for neo-con, warmongering exposure. Purveyor Jan 2016 #17
watch it Hillary,Bernie will never wendylaroux Jan 2016 #18
I am so done with her pscot Jan 2016 #19
She's a danger. And she doesn't deserve to be anywhere NEAR the White House. (n/t) SMC22307 Jan 2016 #20
So we know the frames for Sunday debate Geronimoe Jan 2016 #22
I have no doubt Nyan Jan 2016 #57
Many of the people who will caucus for saltpoint Jan 2016 #23
Did she steal her statement from Mark Rubio? Renew Deal Jan 2016 #24
WTH? moondust Jan 2016 #25
I am sure going to miss Obama 4now Jan 2016 #26
i watched anthony bourdain a little while ago. DesertFlower Jan 2016 #27
Administration officials said in testimony before Congress that if Iran violated other mandates Leontius Jan 2016 #28
It's not diplomacy. Clinton is no longer saltpoint Jan 2016 #31
The administration has said they would do the same thing if Iran violated other agreements. Leontius Jan 2016 #33
I'm sorry. It was poorly conceived and saltpoint Jan 2016 #34
The nuclear deal is a total seperate agreement from the balistic missile question, Leontius Jan 2016 #36
Considered and cool-browed saltpoint Jan 2016 #49
Iran insisted these issues be negotiated separately, and the nuclear deal isn't a treaty. bananas Jan 2016 #45
President Rouhani is not an easily fooled saltpoint Jan 2016 #50
Nice job, Einstein. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #29
Now there is why I finally turned away from Clinton. Chemisse Jan 2016 #32
no however an associate of Sheldon Adelson's did azurnoir Jan 2016 #47
Exactamento! Sad to see, those two are pulling Hillary's strings brush Jan 2016 #66
Face Palm PatrynXX Jan 2016 #35
Fuck this warmongering POS. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #37
She is not calling for war. Sanctions are an alternative to war. totodeinhere Jan 2016 #67
"Iran's attempt to take over the entire Middle East?" No such thing. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #70
The calls for sanctions on Iran ballistic missle testing are underthematrix Jan 2016 #41
Hillary's Bushesq UPC scanner moment. Bernin Jan 2016 #43
What? Aren't her poll numbers sinking fast enough to suit her? n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #46
Former Iran prisoner slams Clinton's call for new sanctions ebayfool Jan 2016 #53
So Uponthegears Jan 2016 #55
She'll have bandoleras across her bosom in debate tonight I guess elias49 Jan 2016 #58
WTF is wrong with this women 4dsc Jan 2016 #59
Typical HRC's sabotaging work. mylye2222 Jan 2016 #60
sadly, I think you've got a point MBS Jan 2016 #64
Typical of DU to talk without having all the facts. Beacool Jan 2016 #74
very depressing. MBS Jan 2016 #63
She has done that before! mylye2222 Jan 2016 #65
A nip in the bud, an attempt to quickly remind everyone LiberalLovinLug Jan 2016 #71
Is anyone embarrassed at all OKNancy Jan 2016 #68
Well, it looks like the Obama administration agrees with Hillary. Beacool Jan 2016 #72
I was pleased to see President Obama announce these sanctions this morning Gothmog Jan 2016 #73
Me too, but don't expect any of her bashers to backtrack and admit that they were wrong. Beacool Jan 2016 #75
Uh oh gwheezie Jan 2016 #77
Okay, you were the latest Uponthegears Jan 2016 #82
if violation of Security Council resolutions is the pivotal criterium for sanctions... mike_c Jan 2016 #79
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton calls for new san...»Reply #14