Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Armed group occupying refuge clash with environmentalists [View all]L. Coyote
(51,134 posts)37. On the Firing Line: Bullies in Stetsons
Good article.
On the Firing Line: Bullies in Stetsons
by Jeffrey St. Clair - James Ridgeway January 15, 2016
Scanning the Sunday New York Times during the summer of 1990, President George Herbert Walker Bush read how an Idaho rancher had threatened to slit the throat of Forest Service ranger Don Oman, who had decided to reduce the number of cattle grazing on several allotments in the Twin Falls District of the Sawtooth National Forest. Bush ordered a Justice Department investigation. A White House aide called Oman and said the president wanted the ranger to know he wouldnt tolerate harassment of federal workers. ......
.....The heightened animosity toward the federal government in the West stemmed, in part, from the increasingly powerful property-rights movement, sometimes generically referred to as the Wise Use movement, consisting of a commingling of corporations, small businesses and landowners who argued that businesses should be compensated for any reductions in the commercial uses of public lands caused by the enforcement of environmental regulations.
On the further fringe of the property rights fight resides a much smaller but vocal group of people who think that the federal system of public lands (national forests and grasslands, national parks and wildlife refuges and BLM lands) are a constitutional fraud and rightly belong to the states and counties. These people tend to view federal workers who oversee public land policy as trespassers on their property. ...........
by Jeffrey St. Clair - James Ridgeway January 15, 2016
Scanning the Sunday New York Times during the summer of 1990, President George Herbert Walker Bush read how an Idaho rancher had threatened to slit the throat of Forest Service ranger Don Oman, who had decided to reduce the number of cattle grazing on several allotments in the Twin Falls District of the Sawtooth National Forest. Bush ordered a Justice Department investigation. A White House aide called Oman and said the president wanted the ranger to know he wouldnt tolerate harassment of federal workers. ......
.....The heightened animosity toward the federal government in the West stemmed, in part, from the increasingly powerful property-rights movement, sometimes generically referred to as the Wise Use movement, consisting of a commingling of corporations, small businesses and landowners who argued that businesses should be compensated for any reductions in the commercial uses of public lands caused by the enforcement of environmental regulations.
On the further fringe of the property rights fight resides a much smaller but vocal group of people who think that the federal system of public lands (national forests and grasslands, national parks and wildlife refuges and BLM lands) are a constitutional fraud and rightly belong to the states and counties. These people tend to view federal workers who oversee public land policy as trespassers on their property. ...........
bit.ly/1OnXPz9 #OregonUnderAttack

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Malheur Bird Refuge Why is Malheur Wildlife Refuge such a special place for birders?
JDPriestly
Jan 2016
#16
I'll probably be banned from DU -- or this comment will be deleted -- but WTF??
OldRedneck
Jan 2016
#7
You won't be banned. I don't think we should shoot them (but part of me wants to).
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2016
#10
I think they have done enough to be taken in by whatever force is necessary.
ohnoyoudidnt
Jan 2016
#13
I think the Ammon Bundy's and his criminal father and the right wing ...........................
turbinetree
Jan 2016
#12
They have armed guards, snipers, and who knows what kind of traps the #BundyBunch set up.
L. Coyote
Jan 2016
#23
Well, they arrested the one guy with a stolen government vehicle and no one was shot.
Vinca
Jan 2016
#30
Exactly, and the broader conspiracy charges can include the #BundyRanch crimes.
L. Coyote
Jan 2016
#33
you know, if 500 LEOs descended, on foot, with pistols (only) holstered and film crews
pasto76
Jan 2016
#35