Latest Breaking News

Kilgore

(1,819 posts)

37. I suggest Hillary follow Blutos advice

Reply to Jarqui (Original post)

Tue Jan 19, 2016, 07:06 PM

Jan 2016

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

149 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Watchdog: Clinton's server had classified material beyond 'top secret' [View all] Jarqui Jan 2016 OP

"these documents contain information derived from classified sources.” peacebird Jan 2016 #1

Uh Oh! Akicita Jan 2016 #25

OH boy...get ready for The Swarm! SoapBox Jan 2016 #2

Arent there "safe spaces" to help with that now? 7962 Jan 2016 #4

Over the top! Disruptful of Her Majesty's coronation! Hurtful and inappropriate! Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #58

Nothing surprising. And yet nothing will happen to her. 7962 Jan 2016 #3

Arrogance or ignorance Sienna86 Jan 2016 #6

+1 7962 Jan 2016 #16

Yes anyone but her. n/t truedelphi Jan 2016 #19

Not just her. Bernin Jan 2016 #106

Yes, and that's the problem. Now we have one law for high-up politicians and another for the plebes? Yo_Mama Jan 2016 #21

Had she just said I screwed up ripcord Jan 2016 #129

Hell, any clerk at any school office knows to keep their personal email separate from their employer bigworld Jan 2016 #12

Well, her argument has always been "nothing marked classified", 7962 Jan 2016 #14

Wait... Are you telling me that I can't read my classified emails and talk about them on gmail... TipTok Jan 2016 #26

You're being sarcastic, but yeah, THATS the excuse!! Yep, whodda thunk? 7962 Jan 2016 #73

I think you are right. But, I also do not think Bernie will take advantage of it. razorman Jan 2016 #91

I dont either. And its frustrating. 7962 Jan 2016 #101

It is mystifying. Surely, he has to see it. You just want to scream when he doesn't respond. razorman Jan 2016 #112

I don't think Bernie will grab onto this either but it's NOT that he's being a "gentleman". napi21 Jan 2016 #126

I agree. But, by the time the Republicans need to start attacking Hillary, razorman Jan 2016 #146

I'd irrationally use the term 'coronation' too LanternWaste Jan 2016 #132

Its used because it gets such a silly reaction from so many. Thats what makes it funny. 7962 Jan 2016 #141

I'm sorry, I thought I wandered onto RedState for a minute. uberblonde Jan 2016 #5

Agreed. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #9

Great reply. Thanks. murielm99 Jan 2016 #20

Yes, but you are still subject to the laws about how to deal with classified information. Yo_Mama Jan 2016 #23

and what laws are those?it's a right wing talking point that has been debunked joeybee12 Jan 2016 #62

There are no laws regarding the handling of classified documents? GummyBearz Jan 2016 #123

When I worked for the gov't hollowdweller Jan 2016 #103

Or Free Republic, or Daily Caller, or Daily Mail or, etc., etc. Beacool Jan 2016 #70

Yup... Clinton ish of the hammer Jan 2016 #96

Depends on when the stuff was classified and when it was put on her server Warpy Jan 2016 #7

If your believe this, you are really misinformed. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #10

pot meet kettle joeybee12 Jan 2016 #64

I don't think the problem is the legality at this point ripcord Jan 2016 #142

You're right, the far right has long been a little too eager to take the Clintons down, both of them Warpy Jan 2016 #143

You nailed it ripcord Jan 2016 #144

There's no way that Hillary is the only one who's done this. SpankMe Jan 2016 #8

True angrychair Jan 2016 #67

So wrong, special access certainly limits access above what top secret does daybranch Jan 2016 #109

Splitting hairs angrychair Jan 2016 #119

This is exactly correct nt kristopher Jan 2016 #127

Outstanding! tinkerbelle Jan 2016 #11

She's going to get indicted... hoosierlib Jan 2016 #13

Nope. Never happen. You're forgetting the name. 7962 Jan 2016 #15

You want her indicted? What's the charge? Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #18

Absolutely... TipTok Jan 2016 #27

When did she say that? Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #31

Her actions clearly show it... TipTok Jan 2016 #34

Evidence of a crime please. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #38

Lots of people give testimony without confessing to their crimes... TipTok Jan 2016 #39

Not evidence of a crime. It's a news story. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #40

I tend to follow the law and think it should be applied equally... TipTok Jan 2016 #43

You mean like the oh so fair and balanced Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #44

Just to be clear... TipTok Jan 2016 #46

I mean the Clinton family has been under attack from the right Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #50

You seemed to be suggesting that since things were unfair during Whitewater... TipTok Jan 2016 #66

Maybe they should stop doing shady shit... TipTok Jan 2016 #85

Aww gee, a passive aggressive personal attack Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #90

The entire Clinton family, organization and 'charity' are indeed... TipTok Jan 2016 #92

King, I refer you to Title 18 US Code, Section 793f Big_Mike Jan 2016 #108

I hold any Sec. of State who wants to be POTUS to a rigorous standard psychopomp Jan 2016 #120

A felony conviction does not bar anyone from the Presidency, Congress or the Judiciary. The 24601 Jan 2016 #139

Misdirection. You've got it. Thats the norm. 7962 Jan 2016 #76

I didn't watch 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #45

Uh, mishandling of sensitive / classified information... hoosierlib Jan 2016 #30

That's not evidence. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #32

WHats already been released would be enough to bust a military member. 7962 Jan 2016 #71

The F.B.I. does not charge anyone. The D.O.J. does. Hoppy Jan 2016 #24

The DOJ does the indicting. The FBI just investigates and gives a reccommendation to the DOJ. Akicita Jan 2016 #29

thanks for posting right wing talking points joeybee12 Jan 2016 #65

Please wager with me. Codeine Jan 2016 #81

Still think this is why Biden was thinking about getting in. hollowdweller Jan 2016 #104

I agree with you. MBS Jan 2016 #110

Gee. A bunch of n00bs jumping on the Hillary-bashing bandwagon. KamaAina Jan 2016 #17

Do the rules not apply to her? TipTok Jan 2016 #28

Actually, she's not my preferred candidate. KamaAina Jan 2016 #33

You got that. It's disgusting to see. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #42

Why don't you guys just come out and call all new posters trolls? 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #47

Not all. Only the ones who come right out of the gate trashing Dems. KamaAina Jan 2016 #49

Just the ones who commit crimes... TipTok Jan 2016 #93

You nailed it n/t emulatorloo Jan 2016 #52

I think I resemble your remark. However, should you care to look, I've been on the Big_Mike Jan 2016 #147

If the FBI has damning evidence she should be indicted. If it doesn't look Akicita Jan 2016 #35

I'm not religious, but "Amen" to that. Karma13612 Jan 2016 #87

Jury RandiFan1290 Jan 2016 #61

A pro-Hillary post got alerted on?! KamaAina Jan 2016 #88

Associated Press as well Babel_17 Jan 2016 #22

I wonder how much of the e-mails nyabingi Jan 2016 #36

That would be the real Benghazi hearing. Nyan Jan 2016 #68

Very sad, and very true nyabingi Jan 2016 #86

I've seen this theory before but have not seen any evidence of it. Akicita Jan 2016 #124

I suggest Hillary follow Blutos advice Kilgore Jan 2016 #37

For fuck's sake give it a rest. 6000eliot Jan 2016 #41

Hillary has three big weak spots: She lacks integrity, GOOD JUDGMENT, and common sense. TryLogic Jan 2016 #48

That and she basically amounts to a pro-choice Republican Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #59

This message was self-deleted by its author Akicita Jan 2016 #125

he is a one note do nothing joeybee12 Jan 2016 #63

Do you all realize the origin of the initial report that the MSM has seized? Beacool Jan 2016 #51

Doesn't matter! Doesn't matter!!! Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #53

You do realize that B, Fox and others now have a copy of the letter, right? magical thyme Jan 2016 #56

The word "Fox" has been mentioned, so everything STOPS NOW!! 7962 Jan 2016 #79

Apparently, this new "bombshell" is just a rehash KingFlorez Jan 2016 #57

Boom. Another non story seized by the Clinton haters. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #60

the letter is dated January 14. The classification is such that the info was "born classified" magical thyme Jan 2016 #69

You nailed the whole POINT! 7962 Jan 2016 #82

She's a calculating woman and there's no real evidence that she is stupid... TipTok Jan 2016 #94

A mind reader too eh? Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #97

I'm a bit calculating myself.... TipTok Jan 2016 #100

Isn't one of the issues that agencies classify information differently? Justice Jan 2016 #118

1. You have to be on the short list of people allowed to see it magical thyme Jan 2016 #121

I'm beginning to consider the fact fredamae Jan 2016 #54

Jeez EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #55

It will be up to Loretta Lynch, not the FBI Yupster Jan 2016 #80

Ahh EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #89

Not really. Lynch can throw her copy in the trash jeff47 Jan 2016 #98

So Lynch is in on it too? Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #99

LOL as if throwing it away is humbled_opinion Jan 2016 #114

Are you a true Bernie supporter ? stonecutter357 Jan 2016 #72

Love your Yoda image. All sides here need to heed his advice. n/t Big_Mike Jan 2016 #149

Hillary is just another too big to fail institution who believes they are above the law. whereisjustice Jan 2016 #74

Ooops, again. Wondered about this the other day. Duval Jan 2016 #75

Were they "double-secret top secret"??????? JoePhilly Jan 2016 #77

Not allowed to say. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #83

So what are you saying that humbled_opinion Jan 2016 #115

It's an on running game of see, hear and above all say no evil, or be dubbed a Traitor . orpupilofnature57 Jan 2016 #78

She's always known zentrum Jan 2016 #84

You are exactly right humbled_opinion Jan 2016 #116

No, right-wing witch hunts certainly aren't going away. NYC Liberal Jan 2016 #95

I know it is getting harder and harder to defend her.... n/t humbled_opinion Jan 2016 #117

So are the GOP rubbing their hands together with glee? Jarqui Jan 2016 #102

I'm tired of this shit either indict her or shut the fuck up. craigmatic Jan 2016 #105

Thank you. complain jane Jan 2016 #107

I don't really feel that way during a Democratic administration. It's probably better to take your 24601 Jan 2016 #111

Good clear post, but just one note Yupster Jan 2016 #122

Can't and won't defend humbled_opinion Jan 2016 #113

If she's the nominee, this is what we'll be hearing 24/7. Vinca Jan 2016 #128

Like it or not Abouttime Jan 2016 #130

Officials-new-top-secret-clinton-emails-innocuous Justice Jan 2016 #131

I wonder if any apologies from people on this thread will be forthcoming. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #133

If the IC IG says they were wrong and there was no classified information and the FBI says that no 24601 Jan 2016 #135

I am sure Fox news will indict her if given the chance. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #136

FWIW MosheFeingold Jan 2016 #137

Looks like this situation is totally different from yours. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #140

You are exactly right ... Nihil Jan 2016 #145

That takes a lot of the rational wind out of this story Jarqui Jan 2016 #138

Another right wing smear on Hillary supported by some on DU. Kingofalldems Jan 2016 #134

Thank you, Sanders supporter. 6000eliot Jan 2016 #148