Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: China push to put astronaut on the moon [View all]baldguy
(36,649 posts)50. How many communications satellites use vacuum tubes?
Are you THAT IGNORANT of history? Or just to enamored of your own opinions that simple facts are unable to get through your armor of arrogance?
When the first computers were developed they were industrial-sized machines. The primary users were the govt, major educational & research institutions and fortune 500 corporations. There was no demand in the '40s, '50s and '60s for smaller computers, and until the '60s computer engineers & designers did have the transistors required to build them, and they weren't even thinking of any applications for such devices.
Until we started going into space.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I imagine there are many different degrees of nationalism-- from the benign to the destructive
LanternWaste
Dec 2011
#45
Wait, what? There's three new companies (and possibly a fourth) who are building rockets now, and
truthisfreedom
Dec 2011
#24
Space tourism and satellite launching for the highest bidders is not quite the same.
onehandle
Dec 2011
#43
Hahaha, you used "apollo was a hoax" and "think" in the same sentence. (nt)
Posteritatis
Dec 2011
#30
What about the censorship? Is it as bad as we have heard or is that also disinformation?
cstanleytech
Dec 2011
#23
Well perhaps we can narrow it down, can you search about the Tiananmen square protests now?
cstanleytech
Dec 2011
#35
And even that seems like playing Russian roulette with a chainsaw these days.. (nt)
Posteritatis
Dec 2011
#70
-5 for not answering the question. -20 for not knowing what you're talking about.
baldguy
Dec 2011
#54
Basic research should be funded by the federal gov't, but the space program isn't the way
Kolesar
Dec 2011
#84
'Taint just ignorance. Denialism isn't just a Republican trait. Sigh.... n/t
PavePusher
Dec 2011
#73
Their first F9 launch was a complete success. Their second? First non-government...
joshcryer
Dec 2011
#96
Considering the amount of Apollo deniers out there I'm just glad they got the right century. (nt)
Posteritatis
Dec 2011
#61
yeah, except they're doing it with our money, while we got crappy products that
Flatulo
Dec 2011
#82
Let them have it. The moon is boring - and humans are too weak and puny for deep spaceflight
Baclava
Dec 2011
#59
The moon is the best next logical step for a base, Mars is too far away at this time
Uncle Joe
Dec 2011
#62
I still think too much money is spent on HUMAN spaceflight - - let our metal brothers lead the way
Baclava
Dec 2011
#77
Good - they'll be needing to import lots of expensive stuff from the US to do it too.
dmallind
Jan 2012
#101