Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
14. To understand the events in Ukraine you must understand the "first" Maidan - Orange Revolution 2004
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 02:39 AM
Feb 2016

Time to post this again.....

[font size="2"]To understand how we got to where we are now: You must understand that this effort has been ongoing since at least the beginning of the new century.

The first attempt at affecting "Regime Change" was the orchestration, mostly by neo-cons, of the "Orange Revolution".

The Wests choice in 2004? A man by the name of Victor Yuschenko.

His wife? An American Citizen and Far Right Republican who had worked for the Reagan Administration, had been director at a NeoCon think tank (New Atlantic Initiative) (Victor also worked with this group) and also worked for the far right think tank the Heritage Foundation. "Katherine Chumachenko Yushenko worked in the White House Public Liaison Office where she conducted outreach to various right-wing and anti-communist exile groups in the United States.



A very good summary from a post on an older version of DU Tinoire
There are links on the original page:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2870381


Ukraine, Yushchenko, his wife (Bush employee), the US and Soros

"After hearing that the NED had pumped $65 million dollars into this election and that his wife was an American citizen, I thought I'd research this a little. I don't know this handsome US-backed Yushchenko but I'm suspecting that he is going to dismantle the Ukraine Boris-Yeltsin style and sell if off to US & European corporate interests. Germany, France and the US already have their deals in place with him over pipelines, utility companies and national resources.

Just thought I'd throw this information out there so that people can see how these things are done and how the media cooperates into presenting these changes as "spontaneous" changes that the US had nothing to do with.

So here we go. First some of the "meddling" that the media hasn't covered and then in my second post, Yushchenko's "dedicated conservative" US State Department wife.

$61 million for the Ukraine elections to back Yushchenko and $100,000 to the Tsunami victims. Just shameful.
==========================================================

Bush Adminstration Spent $65 Million to Help Opposition in Ukraine

December 10, 2004

By: Matt Kelley
Associated Press

Printer Friendly Version

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration has spent more than $65 million in the past two years to aid political organizations in Ukraine, paying to bring opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko to meet U.S. leaders and helping to underwrite exit polls indicating he won last month's disputed runoff election.

(snip)

But officials acknowledge some of the money helped train groups and individuals opposed to the Russian-backed government candidate — people who now call themselves part of the Orange revolution.

For example, one group that got grants through U.S.-funded foundations is the Center for Political and Legal Reforms, whose Web site has a link to Yushchenko's home page under the heading "partners." Another project funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development brought a Center for Political and Legal Reforms official to Washington last year for a three-week training session on political advocacy.

(snip)
The four foundations involved included three funded by the U.S. government: The National Endowment for Democracy, which gets its money directly from Congress; the Eurasia Foundation, which gets money from the State Department, and the Renaissance Foundation, part of a network of charities funded by billionaire George Soros that gets money from the State Department. Other countries involved included Great Britain, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada, Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

Grants from groups funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development also went to the International Center for Policy Studies, a think tank that includes Yushchenko on its supervisory board. The board also includes several current or former advisers to Kuchma, however.

IRI, Craner's Republican-backed group, used U.S. money to help Yushchenko arrange meetings with Vice President Dick Cheney , Assistant Secretary of State Richard Armitage and GOP leaders in Congress in February 2003.

(snip)

the U.S. government, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), granted millions of dollars to the Poland-America-Ukraine Cooperation Initiative (PAUCI), which is administered by the U.S.-based Freedom House. (note: Very hawkish / Dan Quayle is one of their trustees / other names just as disturbing: http://www.freedomhouse.org/aboutfh/bod.htm )

PAUCI then sent U.S. government funds to numerous Ukrainian non-governmental organizations (NGOs). This would be bad enough and would in itself constitute meddling in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation. But, what is worse is that many of these grantee organizations in Ukraine are blatantly in favor of presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko.

Consider the Ukrainian NGO International Center for Policy Studies. It is an organization funded by the U.S. government through PAUCI. On its Web site, we discover that this NGO was founded by George Soros' Open Society Institute. And further on we can see that Viktor Yushchenko himself sits on the advisory board!

(reluctant snip)

This May, the Virginia-based private management consultancy Development Associates, Inc., was awarded $100 million by the U.S. government "for strengthening national legislatures and other deliberative bodies worldwide." According to the organization's Web site, several million dollars from this went to Ukraine in advance of the elections.

(snip)

Note from the USAID page on Ukraine: "Beyond the power sector, USAID plans to identify and assist in removing the obstacles of proper market functioning in other segments of the energy sector such as the privatization of the oil and gas transportation systems."
https://web.archive.org/web/20040826143304/http://www.usaid.gov/pubs/cbj2003/ee/ua/121-0150.html

==================


Yushenko administration lost the presidency 15 months later:


Notably, one of the things that lost him the Presidency only 15 months later was his turn toward the same brand of extreme nationalism. He elevated Stephen Bandera, (a very controversial figure who is revered by extreme factions that Europe and others warned were tied to Social Nationalist Fascist groups) to "Hero" status.

A Fascist Hero in Democratic Kiev

http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/feb/24/a-fascist-hero-in-democratic-kiev/
[/font]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good thing the Tories have a PR agent on this site. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #1
Good thing Putin has a fanboy on this site uhnope Feb 2016 #2
Thanks for keeping that dossier of my work, officer. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #8
Yeah ....... he does that a lot. "Pootie-lover!, blah, blah, blah". polly7 Feb 2016 #18
On the money. elias49 Feb 2016 #20
Do you actually believe that someone "collects" your posts? uhnope Feb 2016 #29
OOPS, by the way... JackRiddler Feb 2016 #10
Know your NeoCons: A family business of Perpetual War newthinking Feb 2016 #13
To understand the events in Ukraine you must understand the "first" Maidan - Orange Revolution 2004 newthinking Feb 2016 #14
Good piece. Thanks. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #32
Columbia University Researchers Confirm Turkey’s Links to ISIS newthinking Feb 2016 #12
I wish they wouldn't say "Turkey" though. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #16
Absolutely. Most Turks are moderate in their lifestyle and/or faith newthinking Feb 2016 #34
Either the headline is wrong, or the UK foreign secretary is insane ErisDiscordia Feb 2016 #3
The problem is that almost all of their bombing is not of ISIS -- not even close to where they are. karynnj Feb 2016 #5
Enough has been Cayenne Feb 2016 #15
your timeline is wrong karynnj Feb 2016 #19
Holy damn... Even the Guardian is starting to get it... Blue_Tires Feb 2016 #4
Conservative politicians make strange arguments daleo Feb 2016 #6
The safe way to be a right-winger on DU... JackRiddler Feb 2016 #9
RWers like Putin uhnope Feb 2016 #11
Rightwingers like your friends of the Venezuelan oligarchy... JackRiddler Feb 2016 #17
lol. no kidding, could you please list some more conspiracy theories that you believe, uhnope Feb 2016 #21
Blather of bankrupt thinking. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #31
Where do your "jokes" start uhnope Feb 2016 #33
The one about your doing systematic surveillance, obviously. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #35
No, because those were allies. Syria is a 3-way civil war. jeff47 Feb 2016 #28
Maybe someone should point that out to Obama? Nihil Feb 2016 #37
No, our attacks are pretty well split between ISIS and Assad. jeff47 Feb 2016 #38
Ah, only 50% spent illegally supporting terrorists then (rather than the 70% I had thought)? Nihil Feb 2016 #41
lol. spouting "oligarchy" uhnope Feb 2016 #42
Wow ... that was a surprise ... Nihil Feb 2016 #44
By that reasoning, the non-ISIS anti-Assad forces are helping ISIS when they attack Assad daleo Feb 2016 #43
Putin is up to no good as usual. n/t Little Tich Feb 2016 #7
Since the Blair / Bush bromance nobody believes the Brits anymore Monk06 Feb 2016 #22
Anyone (US, Russia, UK, France) that bombs non-ISIS fighters 'strengthens ISIS'. pampango Feb 2016 #23
He's attacking "moderate rebels" because they are actively engaging in combat with the Syrian state. killbotfactory Feb 2016 #24
Agreed. And in doing so he is weakening them thus 'strengthening ISIS' relative to its opponents. pampango Feb 2016 #25
Well, yeah. It's a 3-way civil war. jeff47 Feb 2016 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #26
Only 30 responses and 2 recs for this Blue_Tires Feb 2016 #30
Thirty is plenty, there will be more. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #36
FWIW, Cameron isn't the only one saying this Blue_Tires Feb 2016 #40
I think they are still frustrated to not have intervened in 2013, maybe even against Russia jakeXT Feb 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Putin is strengthening Is...»Reply #14