Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Sanders to skip debate unless Clinton agrees to future showdowns [View all]Response to SunSeeker (Reply #49)
Post removed
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
204 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep, Look at her last night when she's suddenly FOR Universal health care and she knows we CAN do
trillion
Feb 2016
#95
+10000. Got to watch her. I thought she was suddenly for single payer. Nope. You're right.
trillion
Feb 2016
#179
I realize that. But she's calling it Universal Healthcare COVERAGE. by COVERAGE she means insurance
magical thyme
Feb 2016
#203
Bernie is the kind of negotiator I would like be the President of this nation.
highprincipleswork
Feb 2016
#2
The debate schedule was set. It disadvantaged Bernie and he had to suck it up. Now his platform is
JudyM
Feb 2016
#161
You can't help these people. After the things Hillary supporters have told me today....
trillion
Feb 2016
#128
Yep. And then he'll stand there and make faces again - like he's in junior high.
BlueCaliDem
Feb 2016
#80
So MS Goldman Sachs is presidential material? You like your corporate candiates bought out throughly
trillion
Feb 2016
#110
I thought Clinton wanted a robust debate? Why not "force" him to debate in NH by agreeing?
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#11
Of course, one might say Clinton and her stooge DWS whined and screamed for fewer debates.
Gene Debs
Feb 2016
#17
I think it's well established who the cowards have been in the debate process
DisgustipatedinCA
Feb 2016
#124
“Bernie Bros” Narrative: a Cheap Campaign Tactic Masquerading as Journalism &Social Activism
KoKo
Feb 2016
#160
Yes, I repeat myself. Moral compass. I'm talking about the candidates here.
highprincipleswork
Feb 2016
#136
Exactly, murielm99. Wonder if he'll even give that fp speech before the NH primary.
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#188
If debates are so good for Clinton and bad for Sanders, why does he want 4 more
hughee99
Feb 2016
#201
Yeah he doesn't change what he says he believes depending on his audience...
PoliticAverse
Feb 2016
#51
'He says the same things over and over,' unlike Hillary who changes he beliefs daily? nt
Live and Learn
Feb 2016
#126
Do you not even know what a super pac is? It's the unlimited millions corporations can give
trillion
Feb 2016
#112
I wonder if maybe we have JP Morgan Chase sponsor NY, HRC will be contractually obligated to appear?
Earth_First
Feb 2016
#4
It is either more debates or not, Hillary is very good at the debates, it gives her an equal
Thinkingabout
Feb 2016
#6
No, she's actually not good at debates because Bernie is intelligent enough to ask the right
trillion
Feb 2016
#120
What is horrid is being in congress for twenty five years and can not give more than
Thinkingabout
Feb 2016
#186
Do you remember Sanders one sentence answer to the foreign policy question
Thinkingabout
Feb 2016
#197
Then why is Clinton balking at 3 more debates and demanding only one more? (nt)
jeff47
Feb 2016
#176
How DARE he want the majority of The Voting Public to be as informed as possible.
Volaris
Feb 2016
#78
lol. I am looking forward to the GOP's red-baiting being a totally worthless attack.
Volaris
Feb 2016
#119
thats because they get most of their journalism from the web, instead of from broadcast (or cable)
Volaris
Feb 2016
#138
It is Bernie who has changed his positions, first agreeing to the NH debate, now refusing...
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#27
She lives in Chappaqa and was born in Illinois. Why does Bernie insist on Brooklyn?
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#25
You asked for a link. That is the first one that popped up for Bernie's Brooklyn demand.
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#57
Why is Sanders refusing ANY additional debates unless he gets one in Brooklyn.
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#191
She suggested it, she is not insisting on it. Sanders wants Brooklyn or NOTHING.
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#195
Yeah, it'd be terrible to have the debate in the same place as Clinton's HQ. (nt)
jeff47
Feb 2016
#177
Sanders to Maddow on 1-19-16: "If the other candidates are in, you count me in."
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#65
Hillary already agreed to the NH debate. There is nothing for her to back down from. nt
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#91
That is not true, just as it was not true when you said there was a debate scheduled for 2/1...
slipslidingaway
Feb 2016
#48
It is true. Bernie says it right in the video. How can you dispute Bernie's own words?
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#53
You need to watch again, he never agreed to a debate on February 1st ...
slipslidingaway
Feb 2016
#63
Sanders to Maddow on 1-19-16: "If the other candidates are in, you count me in."
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#76
The Sanders campaign would only agree to a debate sanctioned by the DNC ...
slipslidingaway
Feb 2016
#96
She picked the Feb. 4 date per Bernie's demands of a weekday. But he agreed to a NH debate first.
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#189
Her campaign HQ is there too! What's up with her not wanting to talk in NY????
ViseGrip
Feb 2016
#18
Good. What do Clinton and DWS not understand about 'more' debates? They don't get to just make
GoneFishin
Feb 2016
#31
Oh jeese....they complain for 9 months that there aren't enough debates...and now this?
George II
Feb 2016
#43
It is Bernie who is snapping his fingers and making conditions after agreeing to a NH debate. nt
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#59
Obviously, BS supporters think the campaign manager's words are worth more than his own. eom
tarheelsunc
Feb 2016
#163
Not true. It's going to be a long hard debate season for both Sanders and Clinton as the politicos
trillion
Feb 2016
#125
I was too tired last night. Yep, spelling. Got to get to work and will be too tired tonight.
trillion
Feb 2016
#181
"So, we NOW have a new Democratic debate scheduled before the Iowa caucuses?
slipslidingaway
Feb 2016
#69
Rachel did not "just" add a debate. She got the candidates to agree to the NH debate first.
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#104
Again BS, just posted what you wrote that Rachel added a debate and now it was to make Bernie happy!
slipslidingaway
Feb 2016
#109
She picked the Feb. 4 date per Bernie's demands of a weekday. But he agreed to a NH debate first.
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#116
And yet he is so afraid of debating before the NH primary that he broke his word to Rachel. nt
SunSeeker
Feb 2016
#190
Because they know New York might go for Sanders, and could be a game-changer.
californiabernin
Feb 2016
#127
You would think she'd be eager to debate in New York. I don't understand why she doesn't want to.
polly7
Feb 2016
#139
This is Bernie's campaign not letting themselves get jerked around.
freedom fighter jh
Feb 2016
#142
This illustrates Bernie's lack of negotiating skill and why he has no endorsements from Congress...
Sancho
Feb 2016
#144
Ok, 1st, it is very rare for me, not "typical"... 2nd, what you cite here is HRCs website and more
JudyM
Feb 2016
#175
As much as I'd like to see them debate again, and as enjoyable as it would be ...
NurseJackie
Feb 2016
#146
If that's true, why does Clinton only want one more debate, and not the 3 Sanders is asking for? nt
jeff47
Feb 2016
#178
When it comes to bargaining, I'll put my Jewish Grandfather up against anyone
ErisDiscordia
Feb 2016
#152
I do not agree to skip any debates. The location is not important. Use homes to lower the cost.
Sunlei
Feb 2016
#165
If Sanders and Clinton have both agreed to this debate already this looks bad.
yellowcanine
Feb 2016
#167