Iowa's nightmare revisited: Was correct winner called?

[pnwmom]

110. The Des Moines Register reporter observed it and said it was "normal mayhem,"

not cheating. I watched the whole thing, too, and cannot understand why anyone would say it was cheating.

They were dealing with hundreds of movable human bodies. Yes, there is a chance someone could have left, but the task they had was almost impossible. Every time they stopped to take a headcount of more than 400 people, they could have lost another few bodies. People go to the bathroom. People get sick of the whole thing and decide to leave. Doing an accurate headcount of more than 400 people takes TIME.

And the question is whether they were off by 3. There was a gap much larger than that between Hillary and Bernie, so the 3 votes wouldn't even have mattered.

No wonder the crowd was getting impatient.

A C-SPAN video (http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4578575/clinton-voter-fraud-polk-county-iowa-caucus) was circulated widely on Facebook and Twitter with claims it was evidence of fraud. In truth, it was an example of the mayhem at some of the most crowded caucus sites, when nose counts differed between rounds of voting because some people left or the initial count was wrong. In this case, precinct No. 43 in Des Moines, a majority of voters, including Sanders backers, voted against a recount.

http://dmreg.co/1SW7scl