Latest Breaking News

turbinetree

(27,789 posts)

53. Really..................................

Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:38 PM

Feb 2016

and the Clinton's have been loyal----------------------I will not get into this gambit of high jacking this party------------------to me high jacking a party is when some Third Way DINO's and the "party' and are still doing what today?

So this is about punishment-----------------really---------------

Hillary Clintons

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000019

https://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2015/12/01/super-pacs-dark-money-and-the-hillary-clinton-campaign-part-1/

Bill Clinton

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/clinton-money/

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/02/05/us/1992-campaign-personal-finances-wealthy-investment-family-big-help-clinton.html

And finally Bernie Sanders past and present

http://maplight.org/us-congress/legislator/450-bernie-sanders

https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00000528

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Congressional Black Caucus backs Hillary Clinton [View all] riversedge Feb 2016 OP

is the cbc the same as the pac? 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #1

I'd bet on purposely misleading. jalan48 Feb 2016 #2

PAC only, no member input. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #4

Yeah, no member input. Funny, though, they're going out on the trail for her, pnwmom Feb 2016 #9

Who cares what the voters and members think? nt Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #12

I can quote stuff too. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #13

No. The CBC�s PAC is led by 20 members. KeepItReal Feb 2016 #7

Rep. Keith Ellison, CBC member tweeted 7:47 am today the CBC PAC endorsed appalachiablue Feb 2016 #15

NO and YES generalchaos Feb 2016 #25

No. Purposely misleading. elleng Feb 2016 #34

Deceptive headline. CBC didn't endorse. Their PAC endorsed, without member input. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #3

Every member of the CBC, save four, have already publicly endorsed her frazzled Feb 2016 #8

So why the need for the deceptive headline then? AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #10

It's not deceptive. You're just confused. frazzled Feb 2016 #11

Politics is politics. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #14

Yes, Ellison is one of the 4 who didn't endorse frazzled Feb 2016 #16

A good number of the leadership of the Teamster's Union probably endorse Hillary. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #17

Not telling the truth is always a good one apparently. cui bono Feb 2016 #21

Oh, now that is alert worthy. frazzled Feb 2016 #23

I apologize for the comparison. I will edit it. But I didn't call you a Teabagger, I likened cui bono Feb 2016 #29

Everything I have posted is factual frazzled Feb 2016 #33

That's a totally different claim. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #45

There are a total of 46 members of the CBC frazzled Feb 2016 #49

I know that there are 46 members. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #50

And yet you just said it publicly. cui bono Feb 2016 #48

No one is agitated by something that didn't happen. cui bono Feb 2016 #20

They're agitated because they don't think black people can think for themselves with or without Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2016 #24

Absolutely agree frazzled Feb 2016 #28

BOOM! MrWendel Feb 2016 #57

His fanatics are attacking me because they're upset with black voters being grown ups. Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2016 #64

Members WERE asked, so you are wrong about that. And Dan Merica touts a Sanders avatar - riversedge Feb 2016 #22

Tell it to Rep. Ellison. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #27

So Keith Ellison is lying? n/t cui bono Feb 2016 #31

Sure is, and DUers who think it's 'swell' are off the mark. elleng Feb 2016 #35

Actually, it's "Congressional Black Caucus Super PAC" backs Hillary Clinton. Google is your friend. Gene Debs Feb 2016 #5

Right. Thanks. elleng Feb 2016 #36

No, it's not...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #67

Read all about the endorsement here! Gene Debs Feb 2016 #6

More proof that HRC is more about appearance than substance Android3.14 Feb 2016 #18

No, actually they did not. cui bono Feb 2016 #19

Only the Super Pac.like the primary in general... pacs and corps for Hillary... people for Bernie boomer55 Feb 2016 #26

bad headline Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #30

I notice that some folks are twisting themselves like pretzels to diminish this endorsement. Beacool Feb 2016 #32

That's essentially what they said at the announcment. Kurovski Feb 2016 #39

Democrats support Democrats. Sanders is not one in many people's eyes. Beacool Feb 2016 #42

His platform is remarkably progressive, and left of Hillary's positions, historically. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #56

I have to say, I find this comment of your's offensive..................................... turbinetree Feb 2016 #43

It's simple. Beacool Feb 2016 #46

Really.................................. turbinetree Feb 2016 #53

Breaking: Sanders questions Obama leadership (Politicio) Timishini Feb 2016 #37

Off topic. Bernin Feb 2016 #41

Please start your own topic. riversedge Feb 2016 #59

He was pretty offensive in his interview this morning - not surprising, though, considering... George II Feb 2016 #62

With all the respect I can muster: Fuck you, Congresspeople! Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #38

Why the insult, because they won't support a man who wasn't a Democrat until 5 minutes ago??? Beacool Feb 2016 #44

Will the Revolution be kicking them out of office? brooklynite Feb 2016 #47

Just more establishment Bernin Feb 2016 #40

Perhaps this might help. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #54

It's a bunch of lobbyists!!! fbc Feb 2016 #51

From John Lewis, the preeminent voice on civil rights... kstewart33 Feb 2016 #52

Someone alerted.. poor thing couldn't handle.. Cha Feb 2016 #55

This is... MrWendel Feb 2016 #58

Eyes rolling. riversedge Feb 2016 #60

Nice OP, rivers! Cha Feb 2016 #61

Wow... SidDithers Feb 2016 #66

This is a major endorsement Gothmog Feb 2016 #63

DU rec for all kinds of reasons...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #65