Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Quixote1818

(31,158 posts)
29. Yes it does because the bond is because of the killing. They passed the starting line
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 12:28 AM
Jun 2012

the instance he got in front of the judge the very first time. It's all interconnected now even if it seems abstract. As the saying goes, anything you say that can be used against you WILL be used against you. If you say anything at all that will bolster their case against you even if it's lying about the bond, they are going to use it to show you lied in court. Even if you just misspoke or honestly didn't remember something right. If they CAN use your statement - if it's going to help their case - they WILL use it.

Also, the police are free to lie to you during an interrogation, and if you tell them something because you thought their lies were the truth - and your statements incriminate you - they will use it because they legally can.

In this case his actions speak to his honesty so they will use it to show he can't be trusted. There is no way the judge is going to knock them down for bringing it up. They will probably bring it up in the opening and closing statements.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If I was defense lawyer, there's no way that I put him on the stand. longship Jun 2012 #1
He is in a tough spot Cosmocat Jun 2012 #8
If that idiot has to rely on his mouth... Frank Cannon Jun 2012 #27
Maybe a plea deal to aggravated manslaughter? rocktivity Jun 2012 #20
Gee, ya think? Boabab Jun 2012 #2
At the moment he can't run anywhere canuckledragger Jun 2012 #6
is that article a little slanted? magical thyme Jun 2012 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author crim son Jun 2012 #9
Do You Have A Link DallasNE Jun 2012 #12
abcnews -- I saw it last night somewhere. here is a link to local affiliate magical thyme Jun 2012 #13
Thank You DallasNE Jun 2012 #15
WTF? "what happened the night the 19-year-old" BumRushDaShow Jun 2012 #4
AP imo has had a credibility problem for many years. LiberalFighter Jun 2012 #5
This analysis is based on an assumption that the case will be presented to a jury slackmaster Jun 2012 #7
But this situation will hurt Zimmerman if he goes for immunity under SYG csziggy Jun 2012 #24
Indeed. Pissing off the judge is always a bad move. slackmaster Jun 2012 #30
There Is Still Much That We Don't Know DallasNE Jun 2012 #10
Interesting Quixote1818 Jun 2012 #17
Maybe there is some sort of trust account handled by O'Mara in trust for Zimmerman??? JDPriestly Jun 2012 #19
One Account I Saw DallasNE Jun 2012 #21
Careful. NRAhadists will come around to defend their poster child. onehandle Jun 2012 #11
From my understanding naaman fletcher Jun 2012 #14
Could Not The Prosecutor Bring It Up In His Opening Statement DallasNE Jun 2012 #16
Anything Zimmerman said in the courtroom or said to police is fair game. nt Quixote1818 Jun 2012 #18
eh.. naaman fletcher Jun 2012 #23
Yes it does because the bond is because of the killing. They passed the starting line Quixote1818 Jun 2012 #29
Zimmerman also lied about Smilo Jun 2012 #22
Prosecutors said Zimmerman did not surrender a second passport, but the judge dismissed that concern rocktivity Jun 2012 #25
Having less-than-zero credibility didn't do Casey Anthony any harm rocktivity Jun 2012 #26
Sorry I duped your post Omaha Steve Jun 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Zimmerman credibility cou...»Reply #29