Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hoosierlib

(710 posts)
14. Drip...drip...drip...
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 04:15 AM
Feb 2016

Not properly storing classified material (whether labeled properly or not) on a secure system is a blatant violation of US law and protocol...criminal referral coming for HRC and her Huma...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So... kryptoniandawn Feb 2016 #1
it gets sticky Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #4
What if Hillary sent classified info to Huma or Sullivan Yupster Feb 2016 #13
well there are published guides Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #16
So the question is did they follow those guides Yupster Feb 2016 #20
does not matter where it originates or Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #21
Did she send or just received the retro e-mails? alfredo Feb 2016 #26
not sure but if recieved it is called spillage Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #29
But if it wasn't classified when sent, and she deleted it, then what? alfredo Feb 2016 #30
nothing if indeed it was not classified Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #35
She did wipe her hard drive. Of course she was criticised for that. alfredo Feb 2016 #40
she tried to wipe the server, but the FBI Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #42
the classified designation is based on the content.. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #24
Things have been classified even after it hit the New York Times. alfredo Feb 2016 #44
i wouldn't imagine so. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #45
Reported first on foreign press, then the NYT. This was during the GWB regime. alfredo Feb 2016 #46
do unsecured emails pose a concern to you? restorefreedom Feb 2016 #47
Yes they do. But why should she secure e-mails that weren't classified. alfredo Feb 2016 #48
she is well,aware of what is sensitive info restorefreedom Feb 2016 #62
After working in Intel, I realized that Catch 22 was a documentary. alfredo Feb 2016 #66
i am going to go out on a limb here and say you were probably not restorefreedom Feb 2016 #67
NO, they don't bother me at all. napi21 Feb 2016 #52
well, if its crap, the fbi investigation will yield squat. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #63
Any time the government discovers an unclassified document that contains classified information, Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #27
Sometimes things are classified to spare an entity from embarrassment. alfredo Feb 2016 #32
not speaking to motivation, only process. Too many are making mystery of a clear process. Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #34
Why aren't they going after past Sec of State's that had their own personal e-mail accounts? alfredo Feb 2016 #39
I guess... because, republicons. Kip Humphrey Feb 2016 #41
They would never play politics with national security would they? alfredo Feb 2016 #43
Some of them were classified (confidential) on origination. At least a few Yo_Mama Feb 2016 #65
Retroactively classified. Not new. More smear crap from Grassley leftofcool Feb 2016 #2
it may have been classified at the time Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #5
Whose fault was that? alfredo Feb 2016 #49
whoever wrote the email Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #57
The emails included information that was classified at the time they were sent. eomer Feb 2016 #19
Apparently she instructed an aide to strip the classified tag from a document at least once dorkzilla Feb 2016 #53
Grassley has no say over what is classified and what isn't. It's an executive branch decision and 24601 Feb 2016 #59
here's my take: ericson00 Feb 2016 #3
She's not hiding anything. erlewyne Feb 2016 #6
.... 840high Feb 2016 #9
Bo-ring bluestateguy Feb 2016 #7
You think Republicans will find it boring? 840high Feb 2016 #10
Seems Sanders fans do not find it boring either riversedge Feb 2016 #33
Nice evasion to my question. 840high Feb 2016 #36
Move ALONG!!! Theres nothing to see here. Again. 7962 Feb 2016 #8
Hillary supporters can poo poo it all they want. Bernin Feb 2016 #11
Well, it's done them so much good so far. 6000eliot Feb 2016 #12
Oh, Clinton will be impeached the day she takes office. joshcryer Feb 2016 #15
Articles of impeachment will be filed as soon after Clinton taking the oath if she gets that far. Ikonoklast Feb 2016 #28
Drip...drip...drip... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #14
Even if this stuff was retroactively classified, the GOP will insist that as SOS Vinca Feb 2016 #17
Shows incredibly poor judgment, at best. Concealing potentially damaging information. Ikonoklast Feb 2016 #31
Yes! +1 Duval Feb 2016 #60
As Bernie said madokie Feb 2016 #18
Scary part? This "witch hunt" is being conducted by Obama's Justice Department and Akicita Feb 2016 #22
I've heard Repubs want to call in lovuian Feb 2016 #23
If the FBI recommends charges and Lynch refuses to indict, the Akicita Feb 2016 #25
Rest assured if that 840high Feb 2016 #38
Agreed. Let's hope it doesn't come to that. President Obama's legacy would Akicita Feb 2016 #50
The FBI reports to the Attorney General - Lynch. Yo_Mama Feb 2016 #64
Cute double standard Depaysement Feb 2016 #37
Part of her job was to protect sensitive information. Especially since she was using an unsecured Akicita Feb 2016 #51
That's NOT her "job" Depaysement Feb 2016 #55
It is the job of every single person who handles classified information to see that that information Akicita Feb 2016 #56
unfortunately it is Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #58
I blame Hillary for using poor judgment azmom Feb 2016 #54
Saturday night data dump Angel Martin Feb 2016 #61
the judge mandated the date karynnj Feb 2016 #68
And still no smoking gun. DCBob Feb 2016 #69
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #70
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Over 1,000 Clinton Docume...»Reply #14