Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

may3rd

(593 posts)

19. What do you need to disrupt nuclear facilities of your enemy? ? ? A thumb drive !

Reply to dipsydoodle (Original post)

Sun Jun 3, 2012, 07:33 AM

Jun 2012

Iran, US: Cyber missiles mean war without bloodshed

....
“You’re seeing an evolution of warfare that’s really intriguing,” said Phil Lieberman, a security consultant and chief executive of Lieberman Software in Los Angeles. “Warfare where no one is dying.”
...
http://www.yalibnan.com/2012/06/02/iran-us-cyber-missiles-mean-war-without-bloodshed/

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Iran threatens to target U.S. bases if attacked [View all] dipsydoodle Jun 2012 OP

They'll fuck up our navy too. MrSlayer Jun 2012 #1

"decimated military"? What? boppers Jun 2012 #13

They're beginning to sound like the North Koreans Zorro Jun 2012 #2

The North Koreans usually threaten to strike first. pennylane100 Jun 2012 #7

"We'll shoot at you if you attack us!" htuttle Jun 2012 #3

+1 That is exactly my line of thinking left on green only Jun 2012 #11

Mobile launchers are notoriously difficult to find and destroy. Flatulo Jun 2012 #12

If it were that easy for either Israel or the US to attack Iran it would have happened by now. teddy51 Jun 2012 #4

Oh, it's easy, just pointless. boppers Jun 2012 #14

It's probably very easy to do, but it's what happens after that will be the problem. nt teddy51 Jun 2012 #15

Perhaps a Persian spring will moot the point may3rd Jun 2012 #20

Neah neah-neah neah neah booga booga booga. . . DinahMoeHum Jun 2012 #5

Why do we keep hearing about Iran, it's annoying Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2012 #6

Because Iran is next on the neocons' hit list, after Iraq. Lasher Jun 2012 #17

the old axis of evil Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2012 #21

All the poking is having the desired effect. woo me with science Jun 2012 #8

Obama is way to smart to attack Iran unless provoked. pennylane100 Jun 2012 #9

Another valid reason to oppose a Romney Presidency. WHEN CRABS ROAR Jun 2012 #10

I'd say they're nuts, but that's how too much of the media plays it bhikkhu Jun 2012 #16

What Would bush do...again? solarman350 Jun 2012 #18

What do you need to disrupt nuclear facilities of your enemy? ? ? A thumb drive ! may3rd Jun 2012 #19