Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
17. Your post indicates the only considerations you believe should be relevant for policies
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 12:21 AM
Feb 2016

dealing with violent criminals are potential deterrence and community safety. That is insufficient.

I and most others, regardless of whether they support capital punishment, believe that criminals should also face penalties as actual punishment for their individual deeds outside of any deterrence factors or community protection.

It's totally irrelevant if they later find God, write children's books, cure cancer, or anything else, some crimes should guarantee permanent and automatic punishments. The deliberate murder of an innocent during the commission of an armed felony could certainly warrant such a severe penalty.

I care little if Gustavo Garcia died of natural causes in a tiny prison cell or by a needle administered by the State, so long as his guilt was certain, justice was served.

However, if you want to abolish capital punishment, also effectively arguing against life without parole as a potential penalty is a strategy doomed to fail in the USA, particularly where one of the most convincing arguments against the death penalty is the existence of LWOP and that sufficiently protects the community, deters similar crimes, and actually punishes the offender.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

wow. thomservo Feb 2016 #1
The human brain doesn't fully develop until age 25 Major Nikon Feb 2016 #2
I don't think ... thomservo Feb 2016 #3
Too bad that didn't save the lives christx30 Feb 2016 #5
Sympathy for the offender has nothing to do with it Major Nikon Feb 2016 #6
I'm more in the christx30 Feb 2016 #8
I'm not sure if by "anything" you mean things like being stoned to death by relatives of the victim Major Nikon Feb 2016 #10
So what do you think should be done with someone like this? christx30 Feb 2016 #11
Very simple Major Nikon Feb 2016 #12
So he writes a book. christx30 Feb 2016 #15
I'm not talking about him Major Nikon Feb 2016 #16
Your post indicates the only considerations you believe should be relevant for policies branford Feb 2016 #17
If it does, that certainly wasn't my intent Major Nikon Feb 2016 #18
You reference revenge rather than justice. LanternWaste Feb 2016 #21
If your brain isn't fully formed and functioning by the time you are old enough to kill or procreate The Green Manalishi Feb 2016 #7
How wonderfully progressive of you Major Nikon Feb 2016 #9
+10000 trillion Feb 2016 #19
Are you saying an 18 year doesnt know that killing somebody is wrong? Travis_0004 Feb 2016 #13
No Major Nikon Feb 2016 #14
Fuck him Reter Feb 2016 #4
Meanwhile today in that state many people were sent to prison for murder and never even had death trillion Feb 2016 #20
And nothing of value was lost. GOLGO 13 Feb 2016 #22
Nothing of value was lost? trillion Feb 2016 #24
How 19th century farleftlib Feb 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Texas executes man in mur...»Reply #17