Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Poll: Clinton still up big in South Carolina [View all]ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)56. Methinks thou dost protest too much
Did you even click on the link to Texas? Or did you fear it just might rock your smug little condescending world as it relates (or not) to POC?
It just might. Why don't you click on the link and see? Go ahead, click, or are you BAWK BAWK BAWK BAWK BAWK BAWK?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you have a better explanation why SBS went on Fox News Sunday last weekend?
ProgressiveEconomist
Feb 2016
#4
See this GDP thead from last weekend with DUers possible explanations
ProgressiveEconomist
Feb 2016
#19
Actually, instead of reading that link, I'm going to phone bank for him today...
Ned_Devine
Feb 2016
#21
He would go on Faux to bash Obama and has done so many times. Any other time, Faux News
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2016
#37
I'm not ATTEMPTING to spin anything. I remember when that picture first came out.
stillwaiting
Feb 2016
#41
THANK YOU for using logic rather than slogans and undifferentiated hostility
ProgressiveEconomist
Feb 2016
#10
Please exlpain why an objective person might find my OP "ridiculous"
ProgressiveEconomist
Feb 2016
#23
"You think think the right wing wants him anywhere near the white house?" Of course
ProgressiveEconomist
Feb 2016
#46